Lifescience Global

IJCHNV1N1A04

Image

IJCHNV1N1A04

What I say isn’t always what I do: Investigating differences in children’s reported and actual snack food preferences - Pages28-38

Sandra C. Jones1, Lisa Kervin2, Samantha Reis1 and Parri Gregory1

1Centre for Health Initiatives, Building 233 (ITAMS), Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia; 2Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia

http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2012.01.01.04

Files

  • Additional Information

    Abstract: The current study sought to explore discrepancies between children’s stated snack food motivations and actual food choices, using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as a measure of implicit attitudes towards ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ foods. Participants were children aged 6-12 years (n=118), from two primary schools on the South Coast of NSW, Australia – a public school in a semi-rural suburb south of a sea-side city and a public school in a largely residential northern suburb of the same city. The children completed a questionnaire about motivations for snack choices, participated in an activity, completed two further questionnaires, selected snack foods from an in-class store, and participated in two rounds of an IAT ‘game’ pairing pictures of snack foods with positive and negative words. As hypothesized, the majority of children reported ‘healthiness’ as their primary motivator for snack food choice, but when faced with an actual purchase decision predominantly chose unhealthy snacks. It appears that children may have internalized the ‘moral’ values attributed to healthy and unhealthy foods and that this process influences both their explicit and implicit attitudes. However, their actual food choices are likely to be influenced by other factors, and thus more complex to understand and influence.

    Keywords: Children, snack food, implicit association test, motivation, preferences, experiment, Australia, food choices, healthy food, purchase decision.

    OUR STRENGTHS

    ♦  Worldwide readership
    ♦  High quality content
    ♦  Maximum visibility
    ♦  Efficient publishing
    ♦  Optional Open Access

    Publish your Research

    Survey

    As an author what type of publishing model you prefer?

    780
    Open Access
    493
    Optional Open Access
    338
    Subscription based
    5 Votes left