Niklas Luhmann and the Risks of Moral Communication: Polemogeny and Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2818-3401.2026.04.03Keywords:
Autopoiesis, communication, constructivism, morality, Niklas LuhmannAbstract
Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory offers a radical rethinking of morality and society, conceptualizing the latter not as a collection of human beings grounded on a moral consensus, but rather as a collection of operationally closed systems of communications. Within this framework, morality is identified as a specific, highly volatile form of communication characterized by the binary code of respect and disrespect, or esteem and disesteem. This medium does not integrate modern society in the way classical thinkers within the sociological tradition such as Émile Durkheim imagined. Rather, in a world defined by the evolution of functional differentiation, morality assumes a provocative "alarm function" that frequently generates more conflict than it resolves, a condition Luhmann identifies as inherently "polemogenous". As a remedy to the contemporary overproduction of moral discourse and moral panics, I propose that a Luhmannian approach must emphasize pluralism and the autonomy of systems.
References
Beck, U. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. tr. Ritter, M. Sage Publications, 1992.
Bombaerts, G. Relational positionism: a constructive interpretation of morality in Luhmann's social systems theory. Kybernetes 2023,52.13: 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0429
Butos, W. and McQuade, T. J. Hayekian Systems. Research into the Structure of Social Interaction. Routledge, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003336150
Brier, S. Applying Luhmann's system theory as part of a transdisciplinary frame for communication science. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 2007,14.2-3: 29-65.
Butler, J. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.
Ehrat, J. Power of Scandal. Semiotic and Pragmatic in Mass Media. University of Toronto Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442686755
Hakobyan, A. Communicating scientific knowledge as News on Social Media: analyses in frames of Luhmann’s System Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2024,37.3: 309-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-023-09659-7
Higuchi, A. Double symmetry in Niklas Luhmann's moral communication. Kybernetes 2022,51.5: 1868-1878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0826
Luhmann, N. Trust and Power. tr. Morgner, C. and King, M. Polity Press, 2017.
Luhmann, N. A Systems Theory of Religion. tr. Brenner, D. A. and Hermann, A. Stanford University Press, 2013.
Luhmann, N. Theory of Society. Vol. II. Barrett, R. Stanford University Press, 2012.
Luhmann, N. Theory of Society. Vol. I. Barrett, R. Stanford University Press, 2012.
Luhmann, N. Are There Still Indispensable Norms in Our Society? Soziale Systeme 2008,14.1: 18-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2008-0103
Luhmann, N. The sociology of the moral and ethics. International Sociology 1996,11.1: 27-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026858096011001003
Luhmann, N. Social Systems. tr. Bednarz Jr, J. and Baecker, D. Stanford University Press, 1995.
Luhmann, N. Risk. A Sociological Theory. tr. Barrett, R. Walter dr Gruyter, 1993.
Luhmann, N. The code of the moral. Cardozo L. Rev. 1992,14: 995-1009.
Luhmann, N. Paradigm lost: on the ethical reflection of morality: speech on the occasion of the award of the Hegel prize 1988. Thesis Eleven 1991,29.1: 82-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369102900107
Luhmann, N. Ecological Communication. tr. Bednarz Jr., J. Polity Press, 1989.
Luhmann, N. The morality of risk and the risk of morality. International Review of Sociology 1987,1.3: 87-101.
Luhmann, N. Differentiation of society. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 1977,2.1: 29-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3340510
Messerschmidt, M. 2025. Embodiment and Subversion: Objections to Judith Butler’s Nietzsche. Nietzsche Studien 55: 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2025-0043
Neckel, S., and Wolf, J. The fascination of amorality: Luhmann's theory of morality and its resonances among German intellectuals. Theory, Culture & Society 1994,11.2: 69-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327694011002004
Paterson, J. Trans-science, Trans-law and Proceduralization. Social & Legal Studies 2003,12.4: 525-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663903012004005
Räwel, J. An allergy of society: on the question of how a societal “lockdown” becomes possible. Kybernetes 2022,51.5: 1814-1832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0797
Rodrigues da Cunha Palmieri, E. Social media, echo chambers and contingency: a system theoretical approach about communication in the digital space. Kybernetes 2024,53.8: 2593-2604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1650
Roth, S. Truth tables, true distinctions. Paradoxes of the source code of science. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2024,37.3: 261-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-023-09640-4
Sapan, I. E. Risk as a structural element of modern society through the concepts of N. Luhmann and U. Beck: socio-philosophical analysis. The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab 2022,5.4: 75-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32326/2618-9267-2022-5-4-75-93
Schecter, D. From Complex Classlessness to Complex Denaturalization: On Marx, Luhmann, and Critical Theory. in: ed. Ricci, G. R. The Persistence of Critical Theory. Routledge, 2017, 63-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133782-4
Šubrt, J. Individualism, holism and the central dilemma of sociological theory. Emerald Publishing, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787690370
Taekke, J. Algorithmic differentiation of society–a Luhmann perspective on the societal Impact of digital media. Journal of Sociocybernetics 2022,18.1: 2-23.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.202216225
Valentinov, V. The Rawlsian critique of utilitarianism: A Luhmannian interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 2017,142.1: 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2786-y
Valentinov, V., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. Emergence: a systems theory’s challenge to ethics. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2016,29.6: 597-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9380-9
Van den Bogaert, A. Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective. Religions 2025,16.1: 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010080
Weingart, P. The Lure of the Mass Media and Its Repercussions on Science. in: eds. Rödder, S., Franzen, M. and Weingart, P. The Sciences’ Media Connection –Public Communication and its Repercussions. Springer, 2011, 17-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_2
Werber, N. A Test of Conscience Without Indispensable Norms: Niklas Luhmann’s War on Terror. Soziale Systeme 2008,14.1: 83-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2008-0107
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
