Comparative Meat Production Performance Evaluation of Buffalo with Cattle at Different Ages

Authors

  • Biplob Kumer Roy Animal Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh
  • Khan Shahidul Haque Animal Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh
  • Nazmul Huda Animal Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2017.06.03.1%20

Keywords:

Species, Age, Meat production, Nutrient utilization, Growth performance

Abstract

An inquisitive on-station feeding trial was carried out to identify the dexterous species and age for beef production with same plane of nutrition. A 2×3 (2 species × 3 ages) factorial experiment was settled for a period of 105 days with eighteen native buffalo and 18 BCB-1 (BLRI Cattle Breed-1) bulls of three age groups (18 months, 24 months and 30 months) and distributed them randomly in six treatment groups having an equal number (6) of animals in each. Intake of nutrients i.e.: DM, CP of buffalo bulls was significantly (p<0.001) higher than BCB-1 bulls in all the cases. The buffalo bulls had significantly higher digestibility of DM (68.0%, p<0.001), OM (67.9%, p<0.001), CP (66.3%, p<0.05), ADF (59.8%, p<0.001) or NDF (59.6%, p<0.001) than cattle (63.0%, 62.7%, 63.6%, 52.4% & 49.6%, respectively). But, the digestibility of DM, OM, CP, ADF or NDF was not affected significantly (p>0.05) by the age of the bulls with any cases. Buffalo bulls gained body weight more rapidly (p<0.001); 1.11 & 0.88 kg/day, respectively and showed a better FCR (p>0.05; 6.72 & 6.86, respectively) than cattle with low feed cost of per kg gain (US$ 1.62 & US$ 1.69, respectively). ADG (p<0.01), FCR (p<0.05) and estimated feed cost (p<0.05) affected significantly and increased linearly by the age of bulls, where 18 months bulls of buffalo and BCB-1 performed best. In an aggregation, it revealed that, buffalo performed better than BCB-1 cattle and 18 months age of both species was more responsive for profitable meat production.

References

FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of Food and Agriculture 2009.

Seventh Five Year Plan, (FY2016 – FY2020). Accelerating Growth, Empowering Citizens. General Economics Division (GED), Planning Commission, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

BBS. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics and Information Division, Ministry of Planning 2014.

Huque QME, Borghese A. Status and Perspectives of Buffalo in Bangladesh. Buffalo Bulletin 2013; 32(Special Issue 2): 1179-1183.

Saadullah M. Buffalo production and constraints in Bangladesh. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2012; 22(3 Suppl.): 221-224.

Kandeepan G, Biswas S, Rajkumar RS. Buffalo as a potential food animal. Int J Live Prod 2009; 1(1): 1-5.

Jabbar MA, Rehman A, Fiaz M, Gilani AH, Pasha TN, Marghazani IB. Comparative Performance of Calves of Buffalo and Different Breeds of Cattle on Feed Lot Fattening. Pakistan J Zool Suppl Ser 2009; 9: 401-407.

Azary AM, Manafiazar G, Razagzadeh S, Amini-jabalkandi J. Comparing fattening performance of Azeri buffalo, native and crossbred (native* Holstein) male calves in west Azerbaijan – Iran. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6(Suppl. 2): 1252-1255. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1252

Islam MR, Miah G, Huque KS, Akhter S, Rahman MM, Islam MZ. Comparative performances of cattle and buffalo calves on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth fed on maize silage and concentrate mixture. Bangladesh J Lives Res 2005; 12(1 &2): 21-32.

Ferdous S, Masum AKM, Khan MAS, Islam MA. Comparative study of the performance of buffalo calves and cow calves by feeding Urea Molasses Block with straw based diet. J Bangladesh Agril Univ 2010; 8(1): 87-90. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v8i1.6404

Lapitan RM, Barrio AND, Katsube O, Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, Fujihara T, Cruz LC, Kanai Y. Comparison of feed intake, digestibility and fattening performance of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Animal Science Journal 2004; 75: 549-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00226.x

Ferrara B, Infascelli F. Invited lecture: Buffalo meat production: consumption, quality, carcass, sub-products. Proc. IV World Buffalo Congress, Sao Paulo, Brasil 1994; 1: 122-136.

Gonzalez OJG. Buffalo bulls for meat production. Ph.D thesis, faculty of veterinary medicine, University of Naples Federico II 2011.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, Centennial Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC 2005.

Van Soest PJ, Roberson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York 1980.

Kennedy PM, Boniface AN, Liang ZJ, Muller D, Murray RM. Intake and digestion in swamp buffaloes and cattle. 1. The comparative response to urea supplements in animals fed tropical grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 1992; 119: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600014179

Ichinohe T, Orden EA, Barrio AND, Lapitan RM, Fujihara T, Cruz LC, Kanai Y. Comparison of voluntary feed intake, rumen passage and degradation kinetics between crossbred Brahmam cattle (Bos indicus) and swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) fed a fattening diet based on corn silage. Animal Science Journal 2004; 75: 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00224.x

Vega RA, Del Barrio AN, Sangel PP, Katsube O, Lapitan RM, Fujihara T. Feed intake, ruminative chewing and nutrient digestibility of feedlot crossbred water buffalo and tropical grade Brahman. Proc. 7th World Buffalo Congress, Philippines, 20-23 October 2004; 2: 375-38.

Puppo S, Bartocci S, Terramoccia S, Grandoni F, Amici A. Rumen microbial counts and in vivo digestibility in buffaloes and cattle given different diets. Animal Science 2002; 75: 323-329.

Udeybir A, Mandal B, Yadav PS. Comparative dry matter intake and nutrient utilization efficiency in growing cattle and buffaloes - an analysis of observed results. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 2000; 17: 56-63.

Huque KS, Sultana N, Rahman Z. Age effects on performance of feed utilization and growth; and carcass characteristics of native bulls of Bangladesh. Annual Research Report, APRD, BLRI, Savar, Dhaka 2005.

Roy BK, Huque KS, Sarker NR, Hossain SMJ, Rana MS, Munsi MN. Study on growth and meat quality of native and Brahman crossbred bulls at different ages. Annual Research Review Workshop-2013. BLRI, Savar, Dhaka-1341 2013.

Roy BK, Sarker NR, Alam MK, Hossain SMJ, Huque KS. Study on feeding plane of nutrition, intake and growth performance of different age groups of RCC bulls. Annual Research Review Workshop-2012. BLRI, Savar, Dhaka-1341 2012.

Bures D, Barton L. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different age. Czech Journal of Animal Science 2012; 57(1): 34-43.

Chashnidel Y, Ansari Pirsarai A, Yousef-Elahi M. Comparison of daily weight gain and fattening characteristics between buffalo and Holstein male calves with different diets. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2007; 6(2): 1199-1201. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1199

Yunus AW, Khan AG, Alam Z, Sultan JI, Riaz M. Effects of substituting cottonseed meal with sunflower meal in rations for growing buffalo calves. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 2004; 17: 659-662. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.659

Ahmad M, Javed K, Rehman A. Environmental factors affecting some growth traits in Nili Ravi buffalo calves. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Montpellier, France. Session 2002; 7: 1-4.

Keshab B, Mohini M, Barman K, Mohini M. Nutrient utilization for growth and cost of feeding in buffalo calves as influence by rumensin supplementation. Buffalo J 2005; 18: 71-81.

Nair PV, Verma AK, Dass RS, Mehra UR. Growth and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves fed ammoniated wheat straw supplemented with sodium sulphate. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 2004; 17: 325-329. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.325

Seth RK. Improvement of buffalo for milk, meat and drought: a review. Indian J Anim Sci 2005; 75: 327-334.

Thevamanoharan K, Vandepitte W, Mohiuddin G, Chantalakhana C, Bunyavejchewin P. Genetic, phenotypic and residual correlations among various growth traits and between growth traits and body measurements of Swamp buffaloes. Buffalo Bull 2000; 19: 55-60.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-06

How to Cite

Roy, B. K., Haque, K. S., & Huda, N. (2017). Comparative Meat Production Performance Evaluation of Buffalo with Cattle at Different Ages. Journal of Buffalo Science, 6(3), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2017.06.03.1

Issue

Section

Articles