How Significant is Partnership Formation in Area-Based Projects to Increase Parental Attendance at Maternal and Child Health Services?

Margaret Kelaher; David Dunt; Andrea Nolan; Bridie Raban; Rae Walker

doi:10.6000/1929-4247.2013.02.02.5

Authors

Margaret Kelaher Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
David Dunt Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Andrea Nolan Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Bridie Raban Early Childhood Consortium, Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Rae Walker School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2013.02.02.5

Keywords:

Partnership, health services, Maternal and Child health, program evaluation, community

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we assess the importance of area-based partnerships in an initiative to improve access to Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services (known as Best Start) in socially disadvantaged communities in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: The study assessed changes in MCH attendance rates, parental attitudes and local partnership formation before and after the introduction of Best Start projects. Partners involved in Best Start projects were surveyed regarding the extent of local partnership formation (before 54; after 84). Data was collected for MCH attendance using routine records for Best Start with MCH projects (before 1,739; after 1437) and the rest of the State (before 45,497; after 45,953). Two cross-sectional surveys of parents of 3-year old children were used to assess changes in parent’s knowledge about, and confidence in using relevant services as well as parental confidence more generally (before 1666; after 1838).

Results: Best Start was significantly associated with improving:

levels of partnership formation (5 of 7 relevant factors)
attendance at the 3.5 year MCH visit in Best Start Sites with MCH projects between 2001/02-2004/05.
parent’s access to information (partnership effect);
confidence about attending the 3.5 year MCH visits (partnership effect); and
overall parental confidence (project effect only).

Conclusion: Best Start improves participation in the MCH attendance. This is related most directly to improving parent’s access to information and overall parental confidence either through local partnership or direct project effects.

References

Belsky J, Melhuish E, Barnes J, Leyland AH, Romaniuk H. Effects of Sure Start local programmes on children and families: early findings from a quasi-experimental, cross sectional study. BMJ 2006; 332; 1476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38853.451748.2F

Love JM, Kisker EE, Ros, C, Raikes H, Constantine J, Boller K, et al. The effectiveness of early head start for 3-year-old children and their parents: lessons for policy and programs. Dev Psychol 2005; 41: 885-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.885

World Health Organisation. Health21- Health for All in the 21st Century. Geneva: World Health Organisation 1998.

Kelaher M, Dunt D, Nolan A, Feldman P, Raban B. The effects of an area-based intervention on breast feeding. Health Policy 2009; 90: 89-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.08.004

Kelaher M, Dunt D, Nolan A, Feldman P, Raban B. The effects of an area-based intervention on the uptake of maternal and child health assessments in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-53

Melhuish E, Belsky J, Leyland AH, Barnes J, National Evaluation of Sure Start Research Team. Effects of fully-established Sure Start Local Programmes on 3-year-old children and their families living in England: a quasi-experimental observational study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1641-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61687-6

Warr D, Tacticos T, Kelaher M, Klein H. Money, stress, jobs: Residents’ perceptions of health-impairing factors in ‘poor’ neighbourhoods. Health Place 2007; 13: 743-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.12.001

Berkeley D, Springett J. From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 2877-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.023

Berkeley D, Springett J. From rhetoric to reality: barriers faced by Health For All initiatives. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 179-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.057

Gray J. Blair's project in retrospect. International Affairs 2004; 80: 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00364.x

Milbourne L, Macrae S, Maguire M. Collaborative solutions or new policy problems: exploring multi-agency partnerships in education and health work. J Educ Pol 2003; 18: 19-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/268093032000042182

Painter C, Clarence E. UK local action zones and changing urban governance. Urban Studi 2001; 38: 1215-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120060990

Lasker RD, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health 2003; 80: 14-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jtg014

Olds DL, Sadler L, Kitzman H. Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48: 355-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01702.x

Lasker RD, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health 2003; 80: 400-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jtg014

El Ansari W, Weiss ES. Quality of research on community partnerships: developing the evidence base. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 175-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh051

Office for Children. 3.5 year & 4-5 year reviews. Melbourne: Office for Children 2007.

Dunt D, Raban B, Kelaher M, Nolan A, Semple C, Feldman P. Best Start Final Evaluation Report. Melbourne: Department of Human Services 2006. [cited 2013 Feb 2] Available from http://www.beststart.vic.gov.au/library_pubs. htm#eval

Victorian Department of Human Services. Best Start Guidelines 2005 v1. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Human Services 2007. [cited 2013 Feb 2] Availailble from http://www.beststart.vic.gov.au/library_pubs.htm

Kendrick D, Elkan R, Hewitt M, Dewey M, Blair M, Robinson J, et al. Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82: 443-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.82.6.443

Olds DL, Kitzman H. Can home visitation improve the health of women and children at environmental risk? Pediatrics 1990; 86: 108-16.

Centre for Community Child Health. A review of the Early Childhood literature. Canberra: Department of Family and Community Services 2000.

Barnett WS, Belfield CR. Early childhood development and social mobility. Future Child 2006; 16: 73-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/foc.2006.0011

Caldwell B, Bradley R. Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: Arkansas: University of Arkansas 1984.

Glascoe F. Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS). Nashville, TN: Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press 1997.

Janus M, Brinkman S, Duku E, Hertzman C, Santos R, Sayers M, et al. The Early Development Instrument: A Population-based measure for communities. A handbook on development, properties, and use. Hamilton, ON: Offord Centre for Child Studies 2007.

VicHealth The partnership analysis tool. Melbourne: VicHealth 2003

Victorian Auditor-general. Giving Victorian children the best start in life. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer 2007.

Jacobson VJC, Szilagyi P. Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; CD003941.

Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: How "out of control" can a randomised community trial be? BMJ 2004; 328: 1561-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561

Mattessich PW, Murray-Close M, Monsey BR. Collaboration: What makes it work. 2nd ed. Saint Paul: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation 2001.

Kanter RM. Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review 1994: July-August; 96-108.

Gray B. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco: Jossey Bass 1989.

Dickinson H. The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future. Health Soc Care Community 2006; 14: 375-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00650.x

Asthana S, Richardson S, Halliday J. Partnership working in public policy provision: A framework for evaluation. Social Policy Administration 2002; 36: 780-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00317

Hardy B, Hudson B, Waddington E. What makes a good partnerhip? A partnership assessment tool. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health 2000.

Centre for Community Child Health Child health screening and surveillance: A critical review of the evidence. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council 2002.