Behavioural Features of Various Social Groups on the Internet

Authors

  • Galina I. Gerasimova Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation
  • Nadezhda Yu. Gavrilova Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation
  • Pavel S. Medvedev Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.3

Keywords:

Internet, information technology, social communication, formation.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to find an effective model for teaching children using modern educational technologies.

Background: The relevance of the study is that the formation of communication in social networks is determined by the ability to search for strategies for social contacts. In this regard, a significant part of people uses a ready-made communicative model created on a technological basis in social networks. The issue of understanding the general structure of communication in the formation of the social structure of a person in adolescents remains debatable.

Method: The article notes that the operation of social networks is governed by purely technical methods and technologies, which can be considered as prerequisites for the translation of such technologies into the space of social interactions.

Results: The authors show that the possibility of a regulatory impact on adolescent behaviour fully meets the principles of organising network communities with an orientation on each person's individual characteristics.

Conclusion: The use of Internet technologies allows for the growth and timely development of communication technologies for the formation of a balanced personality in a globalised world.

References

Choi HJ, Smith RA. Members, isolates, and liaisons: Meta-analysis of adolescents’ network positions and their smoking behavior. Substance Use and Misuse 2013; 48(8): 612-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.800111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.800111

Balázs MA, Pikó B. Serdülokori alkoholfogyasztást befolyásoló tényezok: a szociális háló és a barátok szerepe. Mentalhigiene Es Pszichoszomatika 2013: 14(1): 25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/Mental.14.2013.1.2

Montgomery SC, Donnelly M, Bhatnagar P, Carlin A, Kee F, Hunter RF. Peer social network processes and adolescent health behaviors: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine 2020; 130: article number 105900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105900

Bryan B. Paternal incarceration and adolescent social network disadvantage. Demography 2017; 54(4): 1477-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0589-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0589-8

Cochran M, Bø I. The social networks, family involvement, and pro- and antisocial behavior of adolescent males in Norway. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1988; 18(4): 377-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139256

Gentina E, Bonsu SK. Peer network position and shopping behavior among adolescents. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2013; 20(1): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.10.009

Browning CR, Soller B, Jackson AL. Neighborhoods and adolescent health-risk behavior: An ecological network approach. Social Science and Medicine 2015; 125: 163-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.028

Prochnow T, Delgado H, Patterson MS, Meyer MRU. Social network analysis in child and adolescent physical activity research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2020; 17(2): 250-60. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2019-0350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2019-0350

Jacobs W, Goodson P, Barry AE, McLeroy KR. The role of gender in adolescents’ social networks and alcohol, tobacco, and drug use: A systematic review. Journal of School Health 2016; 86(5): 322-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12381

Shin H. Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, prosocial behavior, and social status: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2017; 46(11): 2305-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8

Jacobs W, Goodson P, Barry AE, McLeroy KR, McKyer ELJ, Valente TW. Adolescent social networks and alcohol use: Variability by gender and type. Substance Use and Misuse 2017; 52(4): 477-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1245333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1245333

Jeon KC, Goodson P. US adolescents’ friendship networks and health risk behaviors: A systematic review of studies using social network analysis and Add Health data. PeerJ 2015; 2015(6): article number 26157622. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1052

Li X, Kawachi I, Buxton OM, Haneuse S, Onnela J-P. Social network analysis of group position, popularity, and sleep behaviors among U.S. adolescents. Social Science and Medicine 2019; 232: 417-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.026

Van Den Bos W, Crone EA, Meuwese R, Güroǧlu B. Social network cohesion in school classes promotes prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(4): Article number e0194656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194656

Mason MJ, Valente TW, Coatsworth JD, Mennis J, Lawrence F, Zelenak P. Place-based social network quality and correlates of substance use among urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescence 2010; 33(3): 419-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.006

Arias Ramos N, Calvo Sánchez MD, Fernández-Villa T, Ovalle Perandones MA, Fernández García D, Marqués-Sánchez P. Social exclusion of the adolescent with overweight: study of sociocentric social networks in the classroom. Pediatric Obesity 2018; 13(10): 614-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12396

Mennis J, Mason MJ. People, places, and adolescent substance use: Integrating activity space and social network data for analysing health behavior. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2011; 101(2): 272-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.534712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.534712

Wölfer R, Cortina KS, Baumert J. Embeddedness and empathy: How the social network shapes adolescents’ social understanding. Journal of Adolescence 2012; 35(5): 1295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015

Seo D-C, Huang Y. Systematic review of social network analysis in adolescent cigarette smoking behavior. Journal of School Health 2012; 82(1): 21-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x

Steijn WMP. A developmental perspective regarding the behaviour of adolescents, young adults, and adults on social network sites. Cyberpsychology 2014; 8(2): article number 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-2-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-2-5

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14

How to Cite

Gerasimova, G. I., Gavrilova, N. Y., & Medvedev, P. S. (2020). Behavioural Features of Various Social Groups on the Internet. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.3

Issue

Section

Thematic Issue - Special Education Paradigm in Contemporary Vital Environment at Educational Institutions