On the Formation of Critical Thinking of Students of a Higher Educational Institution

Authors

  • Maral D. Yessekeshova Department of the Professional Education, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Kulyan Zh. Ibrayeva Department of the Professional Education, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Gulnar K. Kaltayeva Department of the Professional Education, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Nazymgul Albytova Department of Social Pedagogy and Self-Knowledge, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zhanar S. Bekbayeva Department of the Professional Education, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.15

Keywords:

Educational process, methods of cognition, teaching methods, research methods, work with text.e

Abstract

Objective: The paper examined for the first time the features of the formation of systemic critical thinking of students of a higher educational institution, using systemic methods specially developed for this.

Background: Unfortunately, there is practically no specific technology or even a method that specifically solves the problem of forming critical thinking. Nevertheless, each person who did not even receive the skills of critical thinking in the learning process possesses this type of thinking to some extent.

Method: The method of systemic structuring and studying information about the objects in question solves important tasks of developing ways of thinking that are very relevant for future specialists. Implementing the methods of systemic cognition of the studied objects and the surrounding reality ensured the development of the systematic knowledge, skills, and systemic and other relevant ways of thinking and a systematic approach in cognitive and other activities.

Results: The peculiarity of what has been said is that students in the process of implementing this method learn and develop simultaneously the proposed types of activities (actions) and the corresponding ways of thinking, including critical ones, determined by them. The particularly important result of the implementation of a systematic approach and systematic methods developed on its basis is the formation of systematic-critical thinking.

Conclusion: The concept of systematic-critical thinking has been developed. Using a systematic approach as a scientific method allowed to significantly transform not only theory and practice but also existing traditional technologies of the formation of critical thinking.

References

Duron R, Limbach B, Waugh W. Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2006; 17(2): 160-166.

Levine SJ. The online discussion board. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2007; 113: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.248

Barak M, Dori YJ. Enhancing higher order thinking skills among inservice science teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2009; 20(5): 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9141-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9141-z

Jacob SM, Sam HK. Perspectives on crtical thinking through online discussion forums in engineering mathematics. In: K. Elleithy, T. Sobh, M. Iskander, V. Kapila, M.A. Karim, A. Mahmood (Eds.), Technological developments in networking, education and automation. Netherlands: Springer, 2010; pp. 121-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_21

Lunenburg FC. Critical Thinking and Constructivism Techniques for Improving Student Achievement. National Forum Teacher Education Journal 2011; 21(3): 1-9.

Brookfield SD. Teaching for critical thinking, tools and techniques to help students question their questions. San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint, Jossey-Bass 2012.

Choy SC, Pou SO. Reflective thinking and teaching practices: a precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? International Journal of Instruction 2012; 5(1): 167-182.

Seibu MJ. Analyzing critical thinking skills using online discussion forums and CCTST. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012; 31: 805-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.145

Fedotovskaya EI. The methodology for the development of critical thinking as an important factor in the formation of foreign-language communicative competence in specialized universities. Moscow: Russian Academy of Education, 2005.

Denisinkova MV. The formation of intellectual skills of a future geography teacher based on the technology of critical thinking development. Bryansk: Bryansk State University named after academician I.G. Petrovsky 2010.

Kuzmin VP. Epistemological problems of systemic knowledge. Moscow: Znaniye, 1983.

Galiev TT, Abdyrov AM, Yesekeshova MD, Sagalieva JK. A systematic approach to advanced learning. Astana: Publishing house of KazATU named after Saken Seyfullin 2016.

Bezanilla MJ, Fernández-Nogueira D, Poblete M, Galindo-Domínguez H. Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2019; 33: 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Kulamikhina IV, Birova J, Alipichev AY, Vasbieva DG, Kalugina OA. Developing communication and critical thinking through creative writing in English and French language: analysis of classroom management strategies. Komunikacie 2018; 20(1): 115-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2018.1A.115-130

Seventika SY, Sukestiyarno YL, Scolastika M. Critical thinking analysis based on Facione (2015) – Angelo (1995) logical mathematics material of vocational high school (VHS). IOP Conference Series:

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2018; 983: 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012067

Facione PA. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts 2013. Retrieved from: Insight Assessment. https://www.nyack.edu/files/CT_What_Why_2013.pdf.

Litvinova IS. The activities of the teacher of the humanities in the development of critical thinking of high school students. Tula: Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy, 2005.

Eferova AR. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of critical thinking of students in the educational process of a technical university. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14

How to Cite

Yessekeshova, M. D., Ibrayeva, K. Z., Kaltayeva, G. K., Albytova, N., & Bekbayeva, Z. S. (2020). On the Formation of Critical Thinking of Students of a Higher Educational Institution. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.15

Issue

Section

Thematic Issue - Special Education Paradigm in Contemporary Vital Environment at Educational Institutions