Soluble Microbial Products Removal Profile and Morphological Assessment of Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane

Authors

  • Nadir Dizge Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Gulfem Soydemir Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Secil Bayar Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Ahmet Karagunduz Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Bulent Keskinler Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2013.02.02.6

Keywords:

Submerged membrane bioreactor, ultrafiltration, membrane fouling, soluble microbial products (SMP)

Abstract

Performance of ultrafiltration membranes were investigated with submerged membrane in terms of removal of soluble microbial products (SMP) (as proteins and carbohydrates) and fouling mechanisms. Cellulose (UC) and polyethersulphone (UP) membranes with different molecular weight cut off (MWCO) (5, 10, 30 kDa for UC and 5, 10, 20 kDa for UP) were tested in the bioreactor. The quality of permeate was compared in terms of SMP and COD. There was no significant difference in the total SMP removal effectives for both the UC and UP membranes with different MWCO characteristics. However, UP membranes were relatively more effective in removing soluble carbohydrates, while UC membranes were more effective in removing soluble proteins. The submerged membrane bioreactor achieved organic removal efficiencies ranging from 98.1±0.2% to 99.2±0.3% based on the soluble COD levels. Analysis of the membrane performance data by resistances-in-series model indicated that cake fouling was the dominant membrane fouling mechanisms. Increasing the MWCO was resulted in higher membrane flux but lower SMP removal. Morphological examination of the membranes by SEM and AFM showed significant accumulation of organisms on the membrane surface.

References

Massé A, Spérandio M, Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res 2006; 40: 2405-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015

Rosenberger S, Kraume M. Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002; 151: 195-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00998-0

Nagaoka H, Ueda S, Miya A. Influence of extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 1996; 34: 165-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00800-1

Chang IS, Lee CH. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane coupled activated sludge system–effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 1998; 120: 221-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00220-3

Nagaoka H, Yamanishi S, Miya A. Modeling of biofouling by extracellular polymers in a membrane separation activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 1998; 38: 497-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00550-2

Lee W, Kang S, Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 2003; 216: 217-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00073-5

Zhang B, Yamamoto K. Seasonal change of microbial population and activities in a building wastewater reuse system using a membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 1996; 34: 295-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(96)00658-0

Huang X, Liu R, Qian Y. Behaviour of soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 2000; 36: 401-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00206-5

Tansel B, Sager J, Garland J, Xu S, Levine L, Bisbee P. Biofouling affinity of membrane surfaces under quiescent conditions. Desalination 2008; 227: 264-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.030

Tansel B, Sager J, Garland J, Xu S, Levine L, Bisbee P. Deposition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and microtopographical changes on membrane surfaces during intermittent filtration conditions. J Membr Sci 2006; 285: 225-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.031

Tiana JY, Lianga H, Nana J, Yang YL, You SJ, Li GB. Submerged membrane bioreactor (sMBR) for the treatment of contaminated raw water. Chem Eng J 2009; 148: 296-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.032

Choi JH, Ng HY. Effect of membrane type and material on performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Chemosphere 2008; 71: 853-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.029

Yang W, Cicek N, IIg J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: Worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci 2006; 270: 201-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.010

Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kim S, Cho J, Ngo HH. Effect of pretreatment on the fouling of membranes: application in biologically treated sewage effluent. J Membr Sci 2004; 234: 111-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.01.015

Haberkamp J, Ruhi AS, Ernst M, Jekel M. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration. Water Res 2007; 41: 3794-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.029

Wang XD, Wang L, Liu Y, Duan W. Ozonation pretreatment for ultrafiltration of the secondary effluent. J Membr Sci 2007; 287: 187-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.016

Basar CA, Karagunduz A, Cakici A, Keskinler B. Removal of surfactants by powered activated carbon and microfiltration. Water Res 2004; 38: 2117-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.001

Keskinler B, Yildiz E, Erhan E, Dogru M, Bayhan YK, Akay G. Crossflow microfiltration of low concentration–nonliving yeast suspensions. J Membr Sci 2004; 233: 59-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.12.014

Danis U, Keskinler B. Chromate removal from wastewater using micellar enhanced crossflow filtration: Effect of transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity. Desalination 2009; 249: 1356-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.06.023

Dizge N, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Karagunduz A, Keskinler B. Effect of sludge retention time on membrane bio-fouling using different type and pore size of membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Sci Tech 2013; 67(3): 604-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.607

Dizge N, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Karagunduz A, Keskinler B. Effects of cationic polyelectrolyte on filterability and fouling reduction of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR). J Membr Sci 2011; 377: 175-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.048

APHA–AWWA–WEF, Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. APHA, AWWA, and WEF, Washington, DC 1998.

Li T, Bai R, Liu J. Distribution and composition of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane–aerated biofilm. J Biotech 2008; 135: 52-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.02.011

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265-75.

Dubois MJ, Gills KA, Hamilton JK, Reber PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956; 28: 350-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017

Wang P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Mai S. Fouling behaviours of two membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 2011; 382: 60-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.044

Kaya Y, Ersan G, Vergili I, Gönder ZB, Yilmaz G, Dizge N, Aydiner C. The treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater using in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times. J Membr Sci 2013; 442: 72-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.059

Wei CH, Huang X, Aim RB, Yamamoto K, Amy G. Critical flux and chemical cleaning-in-place during the longterm operation of a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res 2011; 45: 863-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.021

Wang P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Mai S. Fouling behaviours of two membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 2011; 382: 60-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.044

Zhang G, Ji S, Gao X, Liu Z. Adsorptive fouling of extracellular polymeric substances with polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2008; 309: 28-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.012

Zhu LP, Zhang XX, Xu L, Du CH, Zhu BK, Xu YY. Impoved protein-adsorption resistance of polyethersulfone membranes via surface segregation of ultrahigh molecular weight poly(styrene-alt-maleic anhydride). Col Surf B: Biointerf 2007; 57: 189-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.01.021

Downloads

Published

2013-05-31

How to Cite

Dizge, N., Soydemir, G., Bayar, S., Karagunduz, A., & Keskinler, B. (2013). Soluble Microbial Products Removal Profile and Morphological Assessment of Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane . Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 2(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2013.02.02.6

Issue

Section

Articles