Purification of Olive Mill Wastewater Using Microfiltration Membrane Technology

Authors

  • Konstantinos B. Petrotos Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Thessaly, School of Agricultural Technology, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Perifereiaki Larissis - Trikalon, 41110, Larissa, Greece
  • Themistocles Lellis Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Thessaly, School of Agricultural Technology, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Perifereiaki Larissis - Trikalon, 41110, Larissa, Greece
  • Maria I. Kokkora Technological Research Center of Thessalia, TEI of Thessaly, 41110, Larissa, Greece
  • Paschalis E. Gkoutsidis Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Thessaly, School of Agricultural Technology, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Perifereiaki Larissis - Trikalon, 41110, Larissa, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2014.03.01.5

Keywords:

Permeate flux, polyphenols, membrane cleaning, OMWW storage, microfiltration

Abstract

Olive mill wastewater (OMWW), a by-product of the olive oil extraction process, is a severe polluting waste, but also a source of antioxidants; polyphenols, especially hydroxytyrosol. This study aimed at investigating the potential of microfiltration (MF) for separating the polyphenols from OMWW. OMWW treatment consisted of a preliminary centrifugation step, followed by MF for the separation of fats and polyphenols.Two types of ceramic MF membranes were used. MF flux ranged between 78 and 95 kg m-2 h-1, indicating the applicability of the described process on commercial scale. Better results were obtained with MF membrane of 50 nm pore size, due to its higher porosity compared to the membrane of 200 nm pore size. The optimum operative conditions were transmembrane pressure of 3.5 bar, flow rate of 10 m s-1, and temperature of approximately 55 °C. A 3-month storage of OMWW prior to treatment resulted in a 20% decrease in permeate flux, indicating that direct processing of the OMWW is necessary. Membrane pollution was not a problem for MF operation and did not affect membrane permeability significantly. Restoring the permeability of water to baseline levels after each use, confirmed the successful cleaning regime applied. The microfiltrate was an excellent antioxidant, which contained useful polyphenols, including hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid and catechin.

References

Zirehpour A, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A. Unique membrane process integration for olive oil mill wastewater purification. Sep Purif Technol 2012; 96: 124-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.028

Zaglis DP, Arvaniti EC, Papadakis VG, Paraskeva CA. Sustainability analysis and benchmarking of olive mill wastewater treatment methods. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2013; 88: 742-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4036

El-Abbassi Α, Hafidi A, Khayet M, García-Payo MC. Integrated direct contact membrane distillation for olive mill wastewater treatment. Desalination 2013; 323: 31-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.014

Fki I, Allouche N, Sayadi S. The use of polyphenolic extract, purified hydrotyrosol and 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid from olive mill wastewater for the stabilization of refined oils: a potential alternative to synthetic antioxidants. Food Chem 2005; 93: 197-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.014

LafkaT-I, Lazou AE, Sinanoglou VJ, Lazos ES. Phenolic and antioxidant potential of olive mill wastes. Food Chem 2011; 125: 92-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.041

De Marco E, Savarese M, Paduano A, Sacchi R. Characterization and fractionation of phenolic compounds extracted from olive oil mill wastewaters. Food Chem 2007; 104: 858-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.005

Garcia-Castello E, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Conidi C, Drioli E. Recovery and concentration of polyphenols from olive mill wastewaters by integrated membrane system. Water Res 2010; 44: 3883-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.005

Russo C. A new membrane process for the selective fractionation and total recovery of polyphenols, water and organic substances from vegetation waters (VW). J Membr Sci 2007; 288: 239-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.020

Turano E, Curcio S, De Paola MG, Calabr V, Iorio G. An integrated centrifugation-ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater. J Membr Sci 2002; 209: 519-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00369-1

Paraskeva CA, Papadakis VG, Tsarouchi E, Kanellopoulou DG, Koutsoukos PG. Membrane processing for olive mill wastewater fractionation. Desalination 2007; 213: 218-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.087

Gkoutsidis PE, Petrotos KB, Kokkora MI, Tziortziou AD, Christodouloulis K, Goulas P. Olive mill waste water (OMWW) treatment by diafiltration. Desalin Water Treat 2011; 30: 237-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2077

Kokkora MI, Petrotos KB, Gkoutsidis PE, Mpoulmpos C. Application of membrane technology to slaughterhouse blood to produce edible powdered protein mixture. J Memb Separ Tech 2012; 1: 35-7.

Petrotos KB. The study of the tomato juice concentration by direct osmosis membrane technology. PhD Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Engineering, Dept. of Chemical Engineering 1999.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-11

How to Cite

Petrotos, K. B., Lellis, T., Kokkora, M. I., & Gkoutsidis, P. E. (2014). Purification of Olive Mill Wastewater Using Microfiltration Membrane Technology. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 3(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2014.03.01.5

Issue

Section

Articles