Control of Membrane Surface Roughness and Pattern Wave Length by Changing the Nonsolvent (Water) Influx Rate

Authors

  • K.C. Khulbe Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada
  • C.Y. Feng Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada
  • T. Matsuura Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada
  • W.J. Lau Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
  • E. Halakoo Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
  • R. Jamshidi Gohari Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
  • A.F. Ismail Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.01.3

Keywords:

Surface roughness, pattern wave length, hydrophobicity/-philicity, AFM, nonsolvent influx rate, membrane.

Abstract

The control of surface roughness of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PS) and cellulose (CE) membranes was attempted by changing the rate of nonsolvent influx in the phase inversion process. PVDF and CE were chosen to represent membranes of high hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity, respectively, while PES and PS were chosen to represent membranes of intermediate hydrophobicity/-philicity. The concentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) in the aqueous coagulation medium was increased from 0 to 1.9 mol/L to decrease the rate of nonsolvent (water) influx in the solvent/nonsolvent exchange process. As well, the effect of polymer concentration and solvent on the surface roughness was investigated with respect to PVDF and PES. It was observed that the membrane surface roughness increased and decreased, respectively, for the hydrophobic PVDF and hydrophilic CE membrane as the rate of nonsolvent influx was decreased. For the PES and PS membranes of intermediate hydrophilic/-philicity, no significant roughness change was observed. The surface roughness tended to increase as the solution viscosity decreased. It was also observed that the pattern wave length of the hydrophobic membrane did not change significantly while that of the hydrophilic membrane increased significantly as the solvent influx rate was reduced. This trend is predictable by considering the shrinking or swelling of the cast polymer solution during the solvent/nonsolvent exchange process.

 

References

Bowen WR, Doneva TA. Atomic force microscopy characterization on ultrafiltration membranes: correspondence between surface pore dimensions and molecular weight cut-off. Surf Interface Anal 2000; 29(8): 544-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9918(200008)29:8<544::AID-SIA901>3.0.CO;2-4

Khulbe KC, Feng CY, Matsuura T. Synthetic polymeric membranes: characterization by atomic force microscopy; Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg 2008.

Yao Y, Guo S, Zhang Y. Surface properties of reverse osmosis membrane. J Appl Polym Sci 2007; 105: 1261-1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.25656

Hirose M, Ito H, Kamiyama Y. Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. J Membr Sci 1996; 121: 209-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0

Stamatialis DF, Dias CR, Norberta de Pinho M. Atomic force microscopy of dense and asymmetric cellulose-based membranes. J Membr Sci 1999; 160: 235-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00089-7

Kwak SY, Ihm DW. Use of atomic force microscopy and solid-state NMR spectroscopy to characterize structure-property-performance correlation in high-flux reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. J Membr Sci 1999; 158: 143-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00039-3

Madaeni SS. The effect of surface characteristics on RO membrane performance. Desalination 2001; 139: 371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00334-4

Vrijenhoek EM, Hong S, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2001; 188: 115-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3

Jamshidi Gohari R, Lau WJ, Matsuura T, Ismail AF. Effect of surface pattern formation on membrane fouling and its control in phase inversion process. J Membr Sci 2013; 446: 326-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.056

Riedl K, Girard B, Lencki RW. Influence of membrane structure on fouling layer morphology during apple juice clarification. J Membr Sci 1998; 139: 155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00239-1

Yan L, Li YS, Xiang CB, Xianda S. Effect of nano-sized TiO2 particle addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. J Membr Sci 2006; 276: 162-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.044

Li YS, Yan L, Xiang CB, Hong LJ. Treatment of oily wastewater by organic-inorganic composite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. Desalination 2006; 196: 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.11.021

Okada T, Matsuura T. Pattern formation on the surface of cellulose membranes prepared by phase inversion technique. Ind Eng Chem Res 1988; 27: 1335-1338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie00079a040

Johnson DC, Nicholson MD, Haigh FC. Dimethyl sulfoxide/paraformaldehyde: a nondegrading solvent for cellulose. Appl Polym Symp 1976; 28: 931-943.

Farnand BA. A Study of Reverse Osmosis Separation Involving Nonaqueous Solutions, PhD Thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa 1983; p. 184.

Uragami T, Sugitani Y, Sugihara M. Studies on syntheses and permeabilities of special polymer membranes: 33. Permeation behaviour of aqueous alcohol solution through cellulose membranes. Polym 1982; 23: 192-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(82)90299-3

Downloads

Published

2015-03-13

How to Cite

Khulbe, K., Feng, C., Matsuura, T., Lau, W., Halakoo, E., Gohari, R. J., & Ismail, A. (2015). Control of Membrane Surface Roughness and Pattern Wave Length by Changing the Nonsolvent (Water) Influx Rate. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 4(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.01.3

Issue

Section

Articles