Scrutinizing the Nanostructural and Nanomechanical Features of Regenerated Cellulose Ultrafiltration Membranes

Authors

  • Luciano Paulino Silva Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Nanobiotechnology Room, Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology Group, Brasilia, 70770-917, DF, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.01.4

Keywords:

Ultrafiltration membranes, Atomic force microscopy, Quantitative nanomechanical mapping, Raman spectroscopy, Nanostructural properties, Nanomechanical properties, Molecular weight cut-off.

Abstract

Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been widely used for many separation processes in which high performance is required. Commercial regenerated cellulose UF membranes with variable molecular weight cut-offs were characterized by high performance atomic force microscopy (AFM) using the novel quantitative nanomechanical mapping mode and the versatility of its signal channels towards nanoscale features elucidation of the materials surface. In addition, Raman spectroscopy was applied in order to investigate some possible chemical behavior changes associated with the UF membranes’ cut-offs. Overall, the results showed that the proposed AFM method was reliable to gain qualitative and quantitative data at unprecedented nanoscale resolution and such information can be used to distinguish UF membranes according to their specific molecular weight cut-offs and properties even on situations in which the molecular behavior were not influenced by the UF membrane’ cut-off. This approach can be useful on quality control procedures of researchers and manufacturers producing or modifying these polymeric materials.

References

Singh N, Chen Z, Tomer N, Wickramasinghe SR, Soice N, Husson SM. Modification of regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membranes by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. J Memb Sci 2008; 311: 225-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.12.036

Phillips AT, Signs MW. Desalting, concentration, and buffer exchange by dialysis and ultrafiltration. In: Current Protocols in Protein Science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471140864.ps0404s38

Cornelissen ER, van den Boomgaard Th, Strathmann H. Physicochemical aspects of polymer selection for ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes. Colloid Surfaces A 1998; 138: 283-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(96)03862-9

Kallioinen M, Pekkarinen M, Mänttäri M, Nuortila-Jokinen J, Nyström M. Comparison of the performance of two different regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membranes at high filtration pressure. J Memb Sci 2007; 294: 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.016

Barbosa EF, Silva LP. Nanoscale characterization of synthetic polymeric porous membranes: Scrutinizing their stiffness, roughness, and chemical composition. J Memb Sci 2012; 407-408: 128-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.025

Young TJ, Monclus MA, Burnett TL, Broughton WR, Ogin SL, Smith PA. The use of the PeakForce™ quantitative nanomechanical mapping AFM-based method for high-resolution Young’s modulus measurement of polymers. Meas Sci Technol 2011; 22: 125703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/22/12/125703

Silva LP, Rech, EL. Unravelling the biodiversity of nanoscale signatures of spider silk fibres. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 3014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4014

Silva LP, Rech, EL. Scrutinizing the datasets obtained from nanoscale features of spider silk fibres. Scientific Data 2014; 140040.

Hamad WY, Eichhorn S. Deformation micromechanics of regenerated cellulose fibers using Raman spectroscopy. J Eng Mater Technol 1997; 119: 309-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2812262

Downloads

Published

2015-03-13

How to Cite

Silva, L. P. (2015). Scrutinizing the Nanostructural and Nanomechanical Features of Regenerated Cellulose Ultrafiltration Membranes. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.01.4

Issue

Section

Articles