Corporate Social Responsibility and Horizontal Differentiation in Imperfect Competitive Markets with Global Warming Effects

Authors

  • Gustavo Barboza Clarion University of Pennsylvania
  • Sandra Trejos Clarion University of Pennsylvania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2013.02.2

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Global Warming, Externalities, Horizontal Differentiation Strategies

Abstract

Abstract: This study develops a model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) behavior that is compatible with both the mutual goals of profit maximization and the reduction of global warming effects. The theory developed in this paper indicates that, under perfect competitive and unregulated markets, firms must take an innovative entrepreneurship approach to reduce global warming externalities, and, consequently, respond to the demands of stakeholders to behave in a CSR fashion. In this setting, managers and firms find incentives to pursue strategies leading to horizontal differentiation when a segment of the market has strong revealed consumption preferences for environmentally friendly products, and when consumers derive a consumption disutility from products creating global warming effects. To achieve these goals, firms using a safe technology also incur certification/labeling costs in order to gain market power. That is, this study demonstrates that, in unregulated competitive markets, efforts to clearly identify sources of global warming effects require innovative entrepreneurship thinking above and beyond government regulatory efforts. Thus, firms behaving in a CSR fashion may achieve monopolistic power, and therefore positive profits. In sum, our model demonstrates that CSR is compatible with the triple bottom line of economic, social and environmental performance.

Author Biographies

Gustavo Barboza, Clarion University of Pennsylvania

Professor of Administrative Science and Professor of Economics

Sandra Trejos, Clarion University of Pennsylvania

Professor of Administrative Science and Professor of Economics

References

Fulton, Murray and K. Giannakas. “Inserting GM products into the food chain: The market and welfare effects of different labeling and regulatory regimes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86.1, (2004): 42-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00561.x
Giannakas, Konstantinos and A. Yiannaka. “Market and Welfare Effects of Second-Generation, Consumer-Oriented GM products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90.1, (2008): 152-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01053.x
Lence, Sergio and D. Hayes. “Ethics, Welfare and Markets: An Economic Analysis” Southern Economic Journal 76.4, (2010): 1107-1130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.1107
Mackey, Alison, T. Mackey and J. Barney. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies” Academy of Management Review 32.3, (2007): 817-835.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275676
McWilliams, Abagail and D. Siegel. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective” Academy of Management Review 26.1, (2001): 117-127.
Waddock, Sandra, C. Budwell and S. Graves. “Responsibility: The new business imperative.” Academy of Management Executive 16.2, (2002): 132-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.7173581

Downloads

Published

2013-01-08

How to Cite

Barboza, G., & Trejos, S. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Horizontal Differentiation in Imperfect Competitive Markets with Global Warming Effects. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2013.02.2

Issue

Section

Articles