Effect of Non-Rubber Constituents on Guayule and Hevea Rubber Intrinsic Properties

Authors

  • Shirin M.A. Monadjemi Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
  • Colleen M. McMahan United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Laboratory, Albany, CA 94710, USA
  • Katrina Cornish Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2016.05.03.1

Keywords:

Guayule, Hevea, natural rubber, protein, resin

Abstract

To meet the increasing demand for natural rubber (NR), currently sourced from the tropical rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis, and address price volatility and steadily increasing labor costs, alternate rubber-producing species are in commercial development. One of these, guayule (Parthenium argentatum), has emerged on the market as a commercial source of high quality rubber. Non-rubber constituents play an important role in the physical properties of NR products. The intrinsic composition of the two NR materials differs and these differences may be a principal cause of the performance differences between them.

We have compared the effect of non-rubber constituents, such as protein, lipids, resin and rubber particle membranes. Firstly, a film casting method was developed to obtain rubber films with a uniform thickness. Secondly, the glass transition temperature of different rubbers was determined by dynamic mechanical analysis, and tensile properties were tested for uncompounded materials. Guayule natural rubber (GNR), from which most of the membranes were removed while in latex form (MRGNR) was found to have higher intrinsic strength than GNR or gel-free NR (FNR). An acetone extraction was performed to quantify the resin and free lipids in the rubber samples.

References

Amnuaypornsri S, Sakdapipanich J, Tanaka Y. Green strength of natural rubber: the origin of the stress-strain behavior of natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 2009; 111: 2127-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.29226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29226

Ikeda Y, Preeyanuch J, Ohashi T, et al. Strain-induced crystallization behaviour of natural rubbers from guayule and rubber dandelion revealed by simultaneous time-resolved

WAXD/tensile measurements: indispensable function for sustainable resources. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 95601-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6RA22455E DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA22455E

Tanaka Y, Kawahara S, Tangpakdee J. Structural characterization of natural rubber. Kaut Gummi Kunstst 1997; 50: 6-11.

Chemistry and Physics of Rubber-like Substance, MacLaren and Sons: London, U.K., 1963.

Amnuaypornsri S, Tarachiwin L, Sakdapipanich JT. Character of long-chain branching in highly purified natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 2009; 115: 3645-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.31419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31419

Thuong NT, Yamamoto O, Nghia PT, Cornish K, Kawahara S. Effect of naturally occurring crosslinking junctions on green strength of natural rubber. Polym Adv Technol 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pat.3887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3887

Trabelsi S, Albouy P-A, Rault J. Stress-induced crystallization properties of natural and synthetic CIS-polyisoprene. Rubber Chem Technol 2004; 77: 303-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5254/1.3547825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547825

Shimomura Y, White JL, Spuriell JE. A comparative study of stress-induced crystallization of guayule, hevea, and synthetic polyisoprenes. J Appl Polym Sci 1982; 27: 3553-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1982.070270929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1982.070270929

Cornish K, Wood DF, Windle JJ. Rubber particles from four different species, examined by transmission electron microscopy and electron-paramagnetic-resonance spin labeling, are found to consist of a homogeneous rubber core enclosed by a contiguous, monolayer biomembrane. Planta 1999; 210: 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250050657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050657

Pichayakorn W, Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC. Preparation of deproteinized natural rubber latex and properties of films formed by itself and several adhesive polymer blends. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012; 51: 13393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie301985y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301985y

Protein (crude) in animal feed combustion method (Dumas method), Method 990.03. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, JAOAC, 1968; 51: 766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/51.4.766

Sommers LE, Nelson DW. Determination of Total Phosphorus in Soils: A Rapid Perchloric Acid Digestion Procedure. In Soil Science Society of America Proceedings: Madison, WI, USA, 1972; 36: 902. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1972.03615995003600060020x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1972.03615995003600060020x

Hossner, L.R. Dissolution for total elemental analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA. 1996; 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c3

Lotti C, Moreno RMB, Gonçalves P de S, Bhattacharya S, Mattoso LHC. Extension rheology of raw natural rubber from new clones of Hevea brasiliensis. Polym Eng Sci 2012; 52: 139-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.22056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.22056

Sakdapipanich JT. Structural characterization of natural rubber based on recent evidence from selective enzymatic treatments. J Biosci Bioeng 2007; 103: 287-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.103.287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.103.287

Karino T, Ikeda Y, Yasuda Y, Kohjiya S, Shibayama M. Nonuniformity in natural rubber as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering, small-angle X-ray scattering, and atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 693-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm060983d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060983d

Nawamawat K, Sakdapipanich JT, Ho CC. Effect of deproteinized methods on the proteins and properties of natural rubber latex during storage. Macromol Symp 2010; 288: 95-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/masy.201050212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201050212

Oh J, Yoo YH, Yoo I-S, Huh YI, Chaki TK, Nah C. Effect of plasticizer and curing system on freezing resistance of rubbers. J Appl Polym Sci 2014; 131: 39795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.39795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39795

Banker GS. Film coating theory and practice. J Pharm Sci 1966; 55: 81-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600550118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600550118

Rezende CA, Bragança FC, Doi TR, Lee LT, Galembeck F, Boué F. Natural rubber-clay nanocomposites: Mechanical and structural properties. Polymer 2010 ; 51: 3644-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.026

Che J, Burger C, Toki S, et al. Crystal and crystallites structure of natural rubber and peroxide-vulcanized natural rubber by a two-dimensional wide-angle X-ray diffraction simulation method. II. Strain-induced crystallization versus temperature-induced crystallization. Macromolecules 2013; 46: 9712-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma401812s DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401812s

Nimpaiboon A, Amnuaypornsri S, Sakdapipanich J. Influence of gel content on the physical properties of unfilled and carbon black filled natural rubber vulcanizates. Polym Test 2013; 32: 1135-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.003

Cornish K. Rubber Science 2012; 25: 139.

McMahan C, Kostyal D, Lhamo D, Cornish K. Protein influences Guayule and Hevea natural rubber sol and gel. J Appl Polym Sci 2015; 132: 42051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.42051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42051

Kawahara S, Kakubo T, Nishiyama N, Tanaka Y, Isono Y, Sakdapipanich J. Crystallization behaviour and strength of natural rubber: skim rubber, deproteinized natural rubber and pale crepe. J Appl Polym Sci 2000; 78: 1510-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1510::AID-APP70>3.0.CO;2-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1510::AID-APP70>3.0.CO;2-4

Thomas S, Chan CH, Pothen LA, Rarjisha KR, Maria HJ. Natural rubber materials: blends and IPNs. RSC Polymer Chemistry Series. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849737647

Siler DJ, Cornish K. Hypoallergenicity of guayule rubber particle proteins compared to Hevea latex proteins. Ind Crops Prod 1994; 2: 307-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0926-6690(94)90122-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6690(94)90122-8

Dos Santos KAM, Suarez PAZ, Rubim JC. Photo-degradation of synthetic and natural polyisoprenes at specific UV radiations. Polym Degrad Stabil 2005; 90: 34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.038

Liao SQ, She XD, Li SD, et al. J Polym Mater 2010; 27: 69.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-08

How to Cite

M.A. Monadjemi, S., M. McMahan, C., & Cornish, K. (2016). Effect of Non-Rubber Constituents on Guayule and Hevea Rubber Intrinsic Properties. Journal of Research Updates in Polymer Science, 5(3), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2016.05.03.1

Issue

Section

Articles