Gasification of High and Low Density Crop Residues

Amit Kumar Singh Parihar; Vinayak B. Kulkarni; G. Sridhar

doi:10.6000/1929-6002.2013.02.04.8

Authors

Amit Kumar Singh Parihar Siemens Technology and Services Pvt. Ltd., Corporate Research and Technologies, Bangalore, India
Vinayak B. Kulkarni Siemens Technology and Services Pvt. Ltd., Corporate Research and Technologies, Bangalore, India
G. Sridhar Siemens Technology and Services Pvt. Ltd., Corporate Research and Technologies, Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2013.02.04.8

Keywords:

Biomass Gasification, Crop Residue, Cotton Stalk, Coconut Shells

Abstract

Crop residue constitutes a large fraction of biomass particularly in agricultural based economies like India. The most abundantly generated crop residues are paddy husk, paddy straw, coconut shell, cotton stalk and sugar cane trash. It is estimated that the potential of power generation using crop residue is close to 14 GWe in a country like India. Even though the potential is large, the main drawback with crop residue is that it is sparsely distributed and being of low density causes collection and transportation problem. This drawback could be converted into an advantage by adopting distributed power generation technologies. The distributed power generation would fare well in the power range of few hundred kilowatts and the most appropriate technology would be the biomass gasification technology. Among the biomass gasification technologies, the downdraft technology is ideally suited for power generation. The downdraft technology is proven with solid or woody biomass, whereas there are limitations in terms of acceptance of all types of crop residues. In this paper, performance study of two vastly differing crop residues, namely coconut shell and cotton stalk has been discussed; both the feedstocks have been tested in “post-harvested” condition with minimum amount of pre-processing. The performance with cotton stalk was found to be comparable at part load; however at higher load the gas composition deteriorated due to poor material movement within the reactor. This had implication in terms of maximum power generated. There was loss of power to an extent of 12%. The operational issues with post-harvested cotton stalk has been brought out which are based on detailed measurements.

References

Mukunda HS. Understanding clean energy and fuels from biomass, Wiley India Pvt Ltd, 2011.

Briquetting of Crop Residues with special reference to Cotton Stalk – Market potential in India. In: Book of papers presented in the International Workshop on Utilization of Cotton Plant Residues for Value Added Products, organized by CIRCOT Mumbai, ICAC and CFC, at Nagpur during November 9-11; pp. 62-76.

Pareek D, Narnaware S, Joshi A, Verma V. Gasification of crop residue briquettes in an open core down draft gasifier, J Agric Eng 2011; 48(2): 2011.

Dasappa S, Sridhar HV, Sridhar G, Paul PJ. Science and technology aspects of bio-residue gasification. Biomass Conver Biorefin 2011; 1(3): 121-31.

Mukunda HS, Paul PJ, Dasappa S, Shrinivasa U, Sharan H, Buehler R, et al. Results of an Indo-Swiss programme for qualification and testing of a 300 kW IISc-Dasag gasifier. Energy for Sustainable Development; The Journal of the International Energy Initiative 1994; 1(4).

Parihar AKS, Joshi C, Sridhar G. The performance of cyclones in producer gas cleaning: experimental and modeling studies Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy Journal of Power and Energy 2012; 226(6).

Qualifying, testing and performance evaluation of biomass gasifiers and gasifier-engine systems, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Govt. of India.

http://www.dieselnet.com/ standards/eu/offroad.html#s3

Sridhar G, Yarasu RB. Facts about Producer Gas Engine, Paths to Sustainable Energy, Jatin Nathwani and Artie Ng (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-401-6, InTech 2010; Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/facts-about-producer-gas-engine