A Comparative Study on the Performance of Fiber-Based Biosorbents in the Purification of Biodiesel Derived from Camelina sativa

Authors

  • Jie Yang Department of Plant and Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University,
  • Quan Sophia He Department of Plant and Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University,
  • Haibo Niu Department of Plant and Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University,
  • Kenneth Corscadden Department of Plant and Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University,
  • Claude Caldwell Department of Plant and Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2016.05.04.2

Keywords:

Drying washing, purification of biodiesel, adsorbent, wood waste, Camelina sativa.

Abstract

Biodiesel has received great interest as a promising substitute for petrodiesel. Biodiesel purification which follows the transesterification process is typically carried out using a wet washing process that generates large amounts of wastewater. Consequently, alternative methods are emerging as sustainable options for biodiesel purification. One of such methods is a dry washing process. In this paper, the performance of three dry washing media (commercially available BD-Zorb, sawdust and wood shavings) were evaluated as potentially suitable options for the purification of biodiesel derived from Camelina sativa. The results indicate that for the crude camelina biodiesel with an initial soap content of 9007 ppm, BD-Zorb exhibited the best purification performance. The soap removal capacity of BD-Zorb, sawdust, and wood shavings was 51.1 mL/g, 24.4 mL/g, and 9.4 mL/g respectively. The primary mechanism of soap removal using sawdust and wood shavings media was physical filtration and adsorption. While for adsorbent BD-Zorb, soap removal mechanism included adsorption and ion exchange due to the existence of a small amount of resins. The ion exchange led to a high acid number (1 mg KOH/g) of the purified biodiesel, and failed to meet the ASTM D6751 specifications (<0.5 mg KOH/g).

References


[1]Bankovic-Ilic IB, Stamenkovic OS, Veljkovic VB. Biodiesel production from non-edible plant oils. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012; 16: 3621-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.002
[2]Omidvarborna H, Kumar A, Kim D-S. Characterization of particulate matter emitted from transit buses fueled with B20 in idle modes. J Environ Chem Eng 2014; 2: 2335-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.09.020
[3]Leung DYC, Wu X, Leung MKH. A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy 2010; 87: 1083-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006
[4]Škrbi? B, Predojevi? Z, ?uriši?-Mladenovi? N. Esterification of sludge palm oil as a pretreatment step for biodiesel production. Waste Manag Res 2015; 0734242X15587546.
[5]Sani YM, Daud WMAW, Abdul Aziz AR. Solid acid-catalyzed biodiesel production from microalgal oil—The dual advantage. J Environ Chem Eng 2013; 1: 113-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.04.006
[6]Stojkovi? IJ, Stamenkovi? OS, Povrenovi? DS, Veljkovi? VB. Purification technologies for crude biodiesel obtained by alkali-catalyzed transesterification. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014; 32: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.005
[7]Atadashi IM, Aroua MK, Aziz AA. Biodiesel separation and purification: A review. Renew Energy 2011; 36: 437-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.019
[8]Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Badruddin IA, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Mekhilef S. A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012; 16: 2070-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.003
[9]Wan-Ghazali WNM, Mamat R, Masjuki HH, Najafi G. Effects of biodiesel from different feedstocks on engine performance and emissions: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 51: 585-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.031
[10]Berrios M, Skelton RL. Comparison of purification methods for biodiesel. Chem Eng J 2008; 144: 459-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.07.019
[11]Atadashi IM, Aroua MK, Aziz ARA, Sulaiman NMN. Refining technologies for the purification of crude biodiesel. Appl Energy 2011; 88: 4239-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.029
[12]Atadashi IM. Purification of crude biodiesel using dry washing and membrane technologies. Alex Eng J 2015; 54: 1265-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.08.005
[13]Wall JA, Van Gerpen JH, Thompson JC. Soap and glycerin removal from biodiesel using waterless processes. Trans ASABE 2011; 54: 535-41. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36456
[14]Faccini CS, Cunha ME da, Moraes MSA, et al. Dry washing in biodiesel purification: a comparative study of adsorbents. J Braz Chem Soc 2011; 22: 558-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532011000300021
[15]Fadhil AB, Dheyab MM, Abdul-Qader A-QY. Purification of biodiesel using activated carbons produced from spent tea waste. J Assoc Arab Univ Basic Appl Sci 2012; 11: 45-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaubas.2011.12.001
[16]Leinonen H, Lehto J. Purification of metal finishing waste waters with zeolites and activated carbons. Waste Manag Res 2001; 19: 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0101900106
[17]Squissato AL, Fernandes DM, Sousa RMF, et al. Eucalyptus pulp as an adsorbent for biodiesel purification. Cellulose 2015; 22: 1263-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0557-7
[18]Manique MC, Faccini CS, Onorevoli B, Benvenutti EV, Caramão EB. Rice husk ash as an adsorbent for purifying biodiesel from waste frying oil. Fuel 2012; 92: 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.024
[19]Gomes MCS, Arroyo PA, Pereira NC. Influence of acidified water addition on the biodiesel and glycerol separation through membrane technology. J Membr Sci 2013; 431: 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.036
[20]Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M. A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 2016; 91: 156-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008
[21]Tapia-Orozco N, Ibarra-Cabrera R, Tecante A, Gimeno M, Parra R, Garcia-Arrazola R. Removal strategies for endocrine disrupting chemicals using cellulose-based materials as adsorbents: A review. J Environ Chem Eng 2016; 4: 3122-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.025
[22]Heinze T, Liebert T. Unconventional methods in cellulose functionalization. Prog Polym Sci 2001; 26: 1689-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00022-3
[23]Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Repo E, Lou S, Sillanpää M. Calcium hydroxyapatite microfibrillated cellulose composite as a potential adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 2016; 283: 445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.035
[24]Hokkanen S, Repo E, Suopajärvi T, Liimatainen H, Niinimaa J, Sillanpää M. Adsorption of Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by amino modified nanostructured microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 2014; 21: 1471-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0240-4
[25]Hokkanen S, Repo E, Bhatnagar A, Tang WZ, Sillanpää M. Adsorption of hydrogen sulphide from aqueous solutions using modified nano/micro fibrillated cellulose. Environ Technol 2014; 35: 2334-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.903300
[26]Gui MM, Lee KT, Bhatia S. Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock. Energy 2008; 33: 1646-53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.06.002
[27]Demirbas A. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 2011; 88: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.016
[28]Krohn BJ, Fripp M. A life cycle assessment of biodiesel derived from the “niche filling” energy crop camelina in the USA. Appl Energy 2012; 92: 92-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.025
[29]Urbaniak SD, Caldwell CD, Zheljazkov VD, Lada R, Luan L. effect of cultivar and applied nitrogen on the performance of Camelina sativa L. in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Can J Plant Sci 2008; 88: 111-9. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS07115
[30]Gugel RK, Falk KC. Agronomic and seed quality evaluation of Camelina sativa in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 2006; 86: 1047-58. https://doi.org/10.4141/P04-081
[31]Jiang Y, Caldwell CD, Falk KC. Camelina seed quality in response to applied nitrogen, genotype and environment. Can J Plant Sci 2014; 94: 971-80. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-396
[32]Kirkhus B, Lundon AR, Haugen J-E, Vogt G, Borge GIA, Henriksen BIF. Effects of Environmental Factors on Edible Oil Quality of Organically Grown Camelina sativa. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61: 3179-85. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf304532u
[33]Iskandarov U, Kim HJ, Cahoon EB. Camelina: An Emerging Oilseed Platform for Advanced Biofuels and Bio-Based Materials. In: McCann MC, Buckeridge MS, Carpita NC, editors. Plants and BioEnergy. Springer New York 2014; pp. 131-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9329-7_8
[34]Veljkovi? VB, Avramovi? JM, Stamenkovi? OS. Biodiesel production by ultrasound-assisted transesterification: State of the art and the perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012; 16: 1193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.022
[35]Yang J, Corscadden K, He QS, Caldwell C. The optimization of alkali-catalyzed biodiesel production from Camelina sativaoil using a response surface methodology. J Bioprocess Biotech 2015; 5. Available from: http://www.omicsonline.org/ open-access/the-optimization-of-alkalicatalyzed-biodiesel-production-from-camelina-sativa-oil-using-a-response-surface-methodology-2155-9821-1000235.php?aid=55251
[36]Yang J, Astatkie T, He QS. A comparative study on the effect of unsaturation degree of camelina and canola oils on the optimization of bio-diesel production. Energy Rep 2016; 2: 211-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.08.003
[37]Gerpen JV. Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Process Technol 2005; 86: 1097-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.005
[38]Yang J, Caldwell C, Corscadden K, He QS, Li J. An evaluation of biodiesel production from Camelina sativa grown in Nova Scotia. Ind Crops Prod 2016; 81: 162-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.073
[39]Khalil HPSA, Alwani MS, Omar AKM. Chemical compostion, anatomy, lignin distribution, and cell wall structure of Malaysian plant waste fibers. BioResources 2007; 1: 220-32.
[40]Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S. Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Use in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. J Polym Environ 2007; 15: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3
[41]Shin S, Jang J, Yoon S-H, Mochida I. A study on the effect of heat treatment on functional groups of pitch based activated carbon fiber using FTIR. Carbon 1997; 35: 1739-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00132-2
[42]Terzyk AP. The influence of activated carbon surface chemical composition on the adsorption of acetaminophen (paracetamol) in vitro: Part II. TG, FTIR, and XPS analysis of carbons and the temperature dependence of adsorption kinetics at the neutral pH. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 2001; 177: 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00594-X

Downloads

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Yang, J., He, Q. S., Niu, H., Corscadden, K., & Caldwell, C. (2017). A Comparative Study on the Performance of Fiber-Based Biosorbents in the Purification of Biodiesel Derived from Camelina sativa. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 5(4), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2016.05.04.2

Issue

Section

Articles