Valorisation of Phosphorus-Saturated Constructed Wetlands for the Production of Sugarcane

Authors

  • Dina Mateus GEOBIOTEC – Geobiociências, Geoengenharias e Geotecnologias, Universidade de Aveiro
  • Mafalda Vaz nstituto Politécnico de Tomar, Unidade Departamental de Engenharias, Campus da Quinta do Contador, Estrada da Serra, 2300-313 Tomar
  • Henrique Pinho CERENA – Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente, Universidade de Lisboa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2017.06.01.1

Keywords:

Bioethanol, expanded clay, phosphorous removal, sustainability, wastewater treatment.

Abstract

Constructed wetlands (CW) are a clean and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional wastewater treatment methods, namely in the removal of the nutrients responsible for the eutrophication of receiving water bodies, as is the case of phosphorus compounds. The materials used as CW filling can directly contribute to the removal of phosphorus compounds from wastewater, but with the operating time they tend to become saturated and treatment efficiency decreases. In order to evaluate the viability of producing an energy crop in phosphorus-saturated CW, sugarcane growth was monitored in two pilot-scale CW filled with two different expanded clay aggregates used for 10 years in wastewater treatment. This paper presents the results obtained during the first year of plant development in the plant-cane cycle. Morphologic aspects of sugarcane growth, such as height and average diameter of stems, average leaf area and number of new sprouts, have been monitored. The results obtained are comparable with those cited in the literature for traditional cultivation. Dry biomass productivity of 26.6 ton per hectare per year can be achieved. Estimated sucrose productivity can reach 13.5 ton per hectare per year, and related bioethanol production potential can be between 2.4 and 7.6 cubic meters per hectare per year, depending on the CW filter media used. It is concluded that the cultivation of sugarcane in CW allows to extend the life of these systems by reusing fillers, and simultaneously is an alternative to produce bioethanol raw-material without the use of scarce resources such as arable land, fresh water and plant nutrients.

References


[1]Cardona CA, Sánchez ÓJ. Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol 2007; 98: 2415-57.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.002
[2]Fischer G, Teixeira E, Hizsnyik ET, van Velthuize H. Land use dynamics and sugarcane production. In: Zuurbier P, van de Vooren J, editors. Sugarcane ethanol production: Contributions to climate change mitigation and the environment. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers 2008; pp. 29-62.
[3]Waclawovsky AJ, Sato PM, Lembke CG, Moore PH, Souza GM. Sugarcane for bioenergy production: An assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Plant Biotechnol J 2010; 8: 263-76.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00491.x
[4]Hess TM, Sumberg J, Biggs T, et al. A sweet deal? Sugarcane, water and agricultural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Environ Change 2016; 39: 181-94.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.003
[5]Souza GM, Victoria RL, Verdade LM, et al. Bioenergy numbers. In: Souza GM, Victoria RL, Joly CA, Verdade LM, editors. Bioenergy & sustainability: Bridging the gaps. Paris: Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment 2015; pp. 28-57.
[6]Inman-Bamber NG, Smith DM. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Res 2005; 92: 185-202.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023
[7]Costa ARFC, Rolim MM, Bonfim-Silva EM, Neto DES, Pedrosa ERM, Silva ÊFF. Accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in sugarcane cultivated under different types of water management and doses of nitrogen. Aust J Crop Sci 2016; 10: 362-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.03.p7205
[8]Albuquerque AW, Sá LA, Rodrigues WAR, Moura AB, Filho MSO. Growth and yield of sugarcane as a function of phosphorus doses and forms of application. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 2016; 20: 29-35.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n1p29-35
[9]Kadlec RH, Wallace SD. Treatment Wetlands, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press 2009.
[10]Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, et al. A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Design and operation. Bioresour Technol 2015; 175: 594-601.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068
[11]Vohla C, Kõiv M, Bavor HJ, Chazarenc F, Mander Ü. Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands – A review. Ecol Eng 2011; 37: 70-89.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.08.003
[12]Mateus DMR, Vaz MMN, Pinho HJO. Fragmented limestone wastes as a constructed wetland substrate for phosphorus removal. Ecol Eng 2012; 41: 65-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.01.014
[13]Haynes RJ. Use of industrial wastes as media in constructed wetlands and filter beds – Prospects for removal of phosphate and metals from wastewater streams. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2015; 45: 1041-103.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.924183
[14]Albuquerque A, Oliveira J, Semitela S, Amaral L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for different media. J Environ Sci 2010; 22: 820-25.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60183-2
[15]Mateus DMR, Pinho HJO. Phosphorus removal by expanded clay – Six years of pilot-scale constructed wetlands experience. Water Environ Res 2010; 82:128-37.http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143009X447894
[16]Mateus DMR, Vaz MMN, Capela I, Pinho HJO. Sugarcane as constructed wetland vegetation: Preliminary studies. Ecol Eng 2014; 62: 175-78.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.031
[17]Mateus DMR, Vaz MMN, Capela I, Pinho HJO. The potential growth of sugarcane in constructed wetlands designed for tertiary treatment of wastewater. Water 2016; 8(93): 1-14.http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w8030093
[18]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome: Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Communication Division, FAO; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420012514
[19]Kottec M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 2006; 15: 259–63.http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
[20]Silva TGF, Moura MSB, Zolnier S, Carmo JFA, Souza LSB. Biometria da parte aérea da cana soca irrigada no Submédio do Vale do São Francisco (Biometrics of the sugar cane shoot during irrigated ratoon cycle in the Submedio of the Vale do São Francisco). Rev Ciênc Agron 2012; 43: 500-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300012
[21]Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Wood AW, Keating BA. Effect of nitrogen on the time-course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Field Crops Res 1996; 47: 143-53.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00022-6
[22]Lavarack BP. Estimates of ethanol production from sugar cane feedstocks. In: Hogarth DM, editor. Proceedings of the Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists; 2003: Townsville, Queensland: Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 2003; p. 69. Available from: https://www.assct.com.au/media/pdfs/2003_pa_m25.pdf
[23]Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri, Eds. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation 2012.
[24]Santos VR, Filho GM, Albuquerque AW, Costa JPV, Santos CC, Santos ACI. Crescimento e produtividade agrícola de cana-de-açúcar em diferentes fontes de fósforo (Growth and yield of sugarcane under different phosphorus sources). Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 2009; 13: 389-96.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662009000400004
[25]Caione G, Lange A, Benett C, Fernandes F. Fontes de fósforo para adubação de cana-de-açúcar forrageira no cerrado (Phosphorus sources for sugarcane forage cultivarsfertilization in the Brazilien Savannah). PesquiAgropecu Trop 2011; 41: 66-73.http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/pat.v41i1.8497
[26]Robertson MJ, Wood AW, Muchow, RC. Growth of sugarcane under high input conditions in tropical Australia. I. Radiation use, biomass accumulation and partioning. Field Crops Res 1996; 48: 11-25.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00041-X
[27]Farias C, Neto J, Fernandes P, Gheiy H. Índice de área foliar em cana-de-açúcar sob diferentes níveis de irrigação e zinco na Paraíba (Leaf are a index of sugarcane under different levels of irrigation and zinc in Paraíba State). Revista Caatinga 2007; 20 (4): 45-55. Available from: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/sistema/article/view/45/235
[28]Agostinho F, Ortega E. Integrated food, energy and environmental services production as an alternative for small rural properties in Brazil. Energy 2012; 37: 103-14.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.003
[29]Maqsood M, Iqbal M, Tayyab M. Comparative productivity performance of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) sown in different planting patterns at farmer`s field. Pak J Agric Sci 2005; 42(3-4): 25-8. Available from: http://www.pakjas.com. pk/papers/428.pdf
[30]Hartmink AE. Sugarcane for bioethanol: Soil and environmental issues. In: Advances in agronomy, Volume 99. Sparks DL, editor. London: Academic Press 2008; pp. 125-82.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00403-3
[31]Schaffel SB, La Rovere EL. The quest for eco-social efficiency in biofuels production in Brazil. J Clean Prod 2010; 18: 1663-70.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.031
[32]He M, Hu Q, Zhu Q, Pan K, Li Q. The feasibility of using constructed wetlands plants to produce bioethanol. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2015; 34: 276-81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.11953
[33]Tanner CC. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems – A comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecol Eng 1996; 7: 59-83.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(95)00066-6
[34]Zheng Y, Wang XC, Ge Y, Dzakpasu M, Zhao Y, Xiong J. Effects of annual harvesting on plants growth and nutrients removal in surface-flow constructed wetlands in northwestern China. Ecol Eng 2015; 83: 268-75.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.035

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Mateus, D., Vaz, M., & Pinho, H. (2017). Valorisation of Phosphorus-Saturated Constructed Wetlands for the Production of Sugarcane. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2017.06.01.1

Issue

Section

Articles