Production and Characterization of Energy Materials with Adsorbent Properties by Hydrothermal Processing of Corn Stover with Subcritical H2O

Authors

  • N.T. Machado Graduate Program of Natural Resources Engineering-UFPA,
  • D.A.R. de Castro Graduate Program of Natural Resources Engineering-UFPA,
  • L.S. Queiroz Laboratory of Catalysis and Oleochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry-UFPA,
  • M.C. Santos Graduate Program of Natural Resources Engineering-UFPA,
  • C.E.F. da Costa Laboratory of Catalysis and Oleochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry-UFPA,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5030.2016.05.03.2

Keywords:

HTC, Subcritical H2O, Corn Stover, Energy Materials, Morphology, Adsorption.

Abstract

This work aims to investigate the effect of temperature on the process performance of hydrothermal processing (HTC) of corn Stover with subcritical H2O and on the morphology of solid products. The experiments were carried out at 200, 225 and 250 ºC, reaction time of 240 minutes, heating rate of 2.0 ºC/min, and biomass to water ratio of 1:10, using a pilot scale stirred tank reactor (STR) of 5 gallon, operating in batch mode. The process performance analyzed by computing the yields of solid and liquid reaction products (RLP). The aqueous phase (H2O + RLP) was physicochemical analyzed for pH and total carboxylic acids, expressed as total acetic acid content. The chemical compositions of carboxylic acids, furfural, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) in the aqueous phase determined by GC-MS and HPLC. The results showed solid yields ranging from 57.39 to 35.82% (wt.), and liquid reaction products (RLP) yields ranging from 39.53 to 54.59% (wt.). The solid phase products were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The chemically activated (2.0 M NaOH) solid phase energy material obtained by HTC at 250 °C, applied as adsorbent to investigate the capacity and/or efficiency to adsorb acetic acid from 1.0 to 4.0 g/L model solutions at 25 °C. The solid phase yield decreases along with the temperature, showing an inflection region between 200 and 225 °C, whereas a drastic change takes place, while that of liquid phase increases, showing also a drastic change between 200 and 225 °C. The total acetic acid content of aqueous phase varied from 4064 to 5387 mg/L, while the pH from 3.77 to 3.91. The GC analysis identified the presence of volatile carboxylic acids, particularly acetic acid, in concentrations between 4020 and 5040 mg/L. HPLC identified the presence of furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural, whose concentrations decrease exponentially and linearly along with the temperature between 686.7 and 0.0, and 443.9 and 0.0 mg/L, respectively, being both compounds not detectable at 250 °C. The elemental/ultimate analysis of solid products shows that carbon content increases, while the oxygen and hydrogen contents decrease, along with the temperature. The H/C and O/C ratios decrease linearly as process temperature increases, and the high heating value (HHV) of solid reaction products, an energy densified material, changes sharply between 200 and 225 °C, showing an increase with temperature. The SEM, EDX, and XDR indicates a change on the morphology and mineralogical phases present in solid reaction products with temperature, particularly at 250 °C. The activated solid phase has proven to be very selective to adsorb acetic acid, showing that recovery of acetic acid from hydrothermal carbonization/liquefaction aqueous solutions is feasible by using a multistage-stage adsorption process in series.

References


[1] Hettenhaus JR, Wooley R, Wiselogel A. Biomass commercialization prospects in the next 2 to 5 years: Biomass colloquies 2000 [Online]. NREL/ACO-9–29–039– 01. Posted 2000 Oct 10. Available http://www.afdc.doe.gov/ pdfs/4809.pdf
[2] Dipardo J. Outlook for biomass ethanol production and demand. Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency 2000. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/pdf/ biomass.pdf.
[3] Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC. Biomass as a feedstock for a bioenergy and bio-products industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM 2006/66, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2005.
[4] Chundawat SPS, Venkatesh B, Dale BE. Effect of particle size based separation of milled corn stover on AFEX pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007; 96: 219-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.21132
[5] Kim S, Dale BE. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy 2004; 26: 361-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.002
[6] Gallager P, Dikeman M, Fritz J, Wailes E, Gauther W, Shapouri H. Biomass from crop residues: cost and supply estimates. Agricultural Economic Report 819, USDA, Washington, DC: 2003.
[7] USDA, FAS Grain: World Markets and Trade. http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/grain.pdf
[8] Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Tagore S, Turhollow AF. Technoeconomic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant-Part 1: Cost of feedstock supply logistics. Biomass Bioenergy 2010; 34: 75-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.001
[9] Varga E, Klinke HB, Reczey K, Thomsen AB. High solid simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of wet oxidized corn Stover to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004; 88: 567-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.20222
[10] Narayanaswamy N, Faik A, Goetz DJ, Gu TY. Supercritical carbon dioxide pretreatment of corn stover and switchgrass for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102: 6995-7000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.052
[11] Jin MJ, Balan V, Gunawan C, Dale BE. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) performance of Clostridium phytofermentans on AFEX-treated corn Stover for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108: 1290-1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23059
[12] Wan C, Li Y. Microbial pretreatment of corn stover with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101: 6398- 6403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.070
[13] Qureshi N, Saha BC, Hector RE, Dien B, Hughes S, Liu S, et al. Production of butanol (a biofuel) from agricultural residues: Part II-use of corn stover and switchgrass hydrolysates. Biomass Bioenergy 2010; 34: 566-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.12.023
[14] Kaliyan N, Morey RV. Natural binders and solid bridge type bindingmechanisms in briquettes and pellets made from corn stover andswitchgrass. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101: 1082- 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.064
[15] Theerarattananoon K, Xu F, Wilson J, Ballard R, Mckinney L, Staggenborg S, et al. Physical properties of pellets made from sorghum stalk, corn stover, wheat straw, and big bluestem. Ind Crops Prod 2011; 33: 325-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.11.014
[16] Zhang GC, Zhang Q, Sun K, Liu XT, Zheng WJ, et al. Sorption of simazine to corn straw biochars prepared at different pyrolytic temperatures. Enviorn Pollut 2011; 159: 2594-2601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.012
[17] Mullen CA, Boateng AA, Goldberg N, Lima IM, Hicks KB. Bio-oil and bio-char production from corn cobs and stover by fast pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2010; 34: 67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.09.012
[18] Fuertes AB, Arbestain MC, Sevilla M, Macia-Agullo JA, Fiol S, Lopez R, Smernik RJ, Aitkenhead WP, Arce F, Macias F. Chemical and structural properties of carbonaceous products obtained by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation of corn stover. Aust J Soil Res 2010; 48: 618-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR10010
[19] Kumar S, Kothari U, Kong L, Lee, YY, Gupta RB. Hydrothermal pretreatment of switchgrass and corn stover for production of ethanol and carbon microspheres. Biomass Bioenergy 2011; 35: 956-968. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.023
[20] Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR. Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 1986-1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.013
[21] Öhgren K, Bura R, Saddler J, Zacchi G. Effect of hemicellulose and lignin removal on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2007; 98: 2503-2510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.003
[22] Lloyd TA, Wyman, CE. Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Bioresour Technol 2005; 96: 1967-1977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.011
[23] Kim TH, Lee YY. Pretreatment and fractionation of corn stover by ammonia recycle percolation process. Bioresour Technol 2005; 96: 2007-2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.015
[24] Kim TH, Lee YY. Pretreatment of corn stover by soaking in aqueous ammonia at moderate temperatures. Appl Biochem and Biotechnol 2007; 137(1): 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-9041-7
[25] Reza MT, Yan W, Uddin MH, Lynam JG, Hoekman SK, Coronella CJ, Vásquez VR. Reaction kinetics of hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine. Bioresour Technol 2013; 139: 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.028
[26] He C, Giannis A, Wang JY. Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior. Appl Energy 2013; 11: 257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084
[27] Parshetti GK, Liu Z, Jain A, Srinivasan MP, Balasubramanian R. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for energy production with coal. Fuel 2013; 111: 201-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.052
[28] Escala M, Zumbühl T, Koller Ch, Junge R, Krebs R. Hydrothermal carbonization as an energy-efficient alternative to established drying technologies for sewage sludge: A feasibility study on a laboratory scale. Energy Fuels 2013; 27(1): 454-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef3015266
[29] Zhao P, Shen Y, Ge S, Yoshikawa K. Energy recycling from sewage sludge by producing solid biofuel with hydrothermal carbonization. Energy Convers Manag 2014; 78: 815-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.026
[30] Peterson AA, Vogel F, Lachance RP, Froling M, Antal JMJ, Tester JW. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energ Environ Sci 2008; 1: 32-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b810100k
[31] Brunner G. Hydrothermal and Supercritical Water Processes. 1st edition. Elsevier, 2014.
[32] Möller M, Nilges P, Harnisch F, Schröder U. Subcritical water as reaction environment. Fundamentals of hydrothermal biomass transformation. ChemSusChem. 2011; 4: 566-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000341
[33] Öztürk ?, Irmak S, Hesenov A, Erbatur O. Hydrolysis of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) stems by catalytical thermal treatment in subcritical water. Biomass Bioenergy 2010; 34: 1578-1585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.005
[34] Becker R, Dorgerloh U, Paulke E, Mumme J, Nehls I. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: Major Organic Components of the Aqueous Phase. Chem Eng Technol 2014; 37(3): 511-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300401
[35] Becker R, Dorgerloch U, Helmis M, Mumme J, Diakité M, Nehls I. Hydrothermally carbonized plant material: patterns of volatile organic compounds detected by gas chromatography. Bioresour Technol 2013; 130: 621-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.102
[36] Reza MT, Becker W, Sachsenheimer K, Mumme J. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC): near infrared spectroscopy and partial least-squares regression for determination of selective components in HTC solid and liquid products derived from maize silage. Bioresour Technol 2014; 161: 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.008
[37] Ju YH, Huynh LH, Kasim NS, Guo TJ, Wang JH, Fazary AE. Analysis of soluble and insoluble fractions of alkali and subcritical water treated sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 2011; 83: 591-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.022
[38] Phaiboonsilpa N, Yamauchi K, Lu X, Saka S. Two-step hydrolysis of Japanese cedar as treated by semi-flow hotcompressed water. J Wood Sci 2010; 56(4): 331-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1099-0
[39] Reza MT, Wirth B, Lüder U, Werner M. Behavior of selected hydrolyzed and dehydrated products during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresour Technol 2014; 169: 352- 361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.010
[40] Stemann J, Putschew A, Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization: process water characterization and effects of water recirculation. Bioresour Technol 2013; 143: 139-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.098
[41] Uddin MH, Reza MT, Lynam JG, Coronella CJ. Effects of water recycling in hydrothermal carbonization of Loblolly pine. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2013; 33(4): 1309-1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.11899
[42] Wirth B, Mumme J. Anaerobic digestion of wastewater from hydrothermal carbonization of corn silage. Appl Bioenergy 2014; 1(1): 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/apbi-2013-0001
[43] Schneider D, Escala M, Supawittayayothin K, Tippayawong N. Characterization of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo. Int J Energy Environ 2011; 2(4): 647-652.
[44] Funke A, Reebs F, Kruse A. Experimental comparison of hydrothermal and vapothermal carbonization. Fuel Process Technol 2013; 115: 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.04.020
[45] Falco C, Bacille N, Titirici MM. Morphological and structural differences between glucose, cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass derived hydrothermal carbons. Green Chem 2011; 13: 3273-3281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15742f
[46] Liu Z, Balasubramanian R. Upgrading of waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and low temperature pyrolysis (LTP): A comparative evaluation. Appl Energy 2014; 114: 857-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.027
[47] Minowa T, Fang Z, Ogi T, Vàrhegyi G. Decomposition of cellulose and glucose in hot-compressed water under catalyst-free conditions. JChem Eng Jpn 1998; 31(1): 131- 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1252/jcej.31.131
[48] Yu Y, Wu H. Significant differences in the hydrolysis behavior of amorphous and crystalline portions within microcrystalline cellulose in hot-compressed water. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 3902-3909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie901925g
[49] Yu Y, Lou X, Wu H. Some recent advances in hydrolysis of biomass in hot-compressed water andits comparisons with other hydrolysis methods. Energy Fuels 2008; 22: 46-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef700292p
[50] Zhang B, Huang HJ, Ramaswamy S. Reaction kinetics of the hydrothermal treatment of lignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008; 147: 119-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8070-6
[51] Oliveira I, Blöhse D, Ramke HG. Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues. Bioresour Technol 2013; 142: 138- 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.125
[52] Mota SAP, Mâncio AA, Lhamas DEL, Abreu DH, Silva MS, Santos WG, Castro DAR, Oliveira RM, Araújo ME, Borges LEP, Machado NT. Production of green diesel by thermal catalytic cracking of crude palm oil (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) in a pilot plant. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2014; 110: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.06.011
[53] Almeida HS, Corrêa OA, Eid JG, Ribeiro HJ, Castro DAR, Pereira MS, Pereira LM, Mâncio AA, Santos MC, Souza JAS, Borges LEP, Mendonça NM, Machado NT. Production of Biofuels by Thermal Catalytic Cracking of Scum from Grease Traps in Pilot Scale. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis Journal 2016; 118: 20-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.12.019
[54] Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2004; 27: 339-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.007
[55] Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004; 86(1): 88-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.20043
[56] Varga E, Szengyel Z, Réczey K. Chemical pretreatment of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestability. Appl Biochem and Biotechnol 2002; 98(1): 73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:98-100:1-9:73
[57] Ang?n D, ?ensöz S. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and surface properties of biochar of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Int J Phytoremediation 2014; 16: 684- 693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.856842
[58] Liu Z, Zhang FS, Wu J. Characterization and Application of Chars Produced from Pinewood Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Treatment. Fuel 2010; 89 (2): 510-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.042
[59] Xiao LP, Shi ZJ, Xu F, Sun RC. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2012; 118: 619-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060
[60] Hoskinson RL, Karlen DL, Birrell SJ, Radtke CW, Wilhelm WW. Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 2007; 31: 126-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.006
[61] Mumme J, Eckervogt L, Pielert J, Diakité M, Rupp F, Kern J. Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested maize silage. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102: 9255-9260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.099
[62] Reza MT, Uddin MH, Lynam JG, Hoekman SK, Coronella C. Hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine: reaction chemistry and water balance. Biomass Conv Bioref 2014; 4(4): 311-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13399-014-0115-9
[63] Funke A, Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Bior 2010; 4(2): 160- 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198
[64] Islam MA, Tan I, Benhouria A, Asif M, Hameed BH. Methylene Blue adsorption on factory-rejected activated carbon prepared by conjunction of hydrothermal carbonization and sodium hydroxide activation process. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2015; 52: 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.010
[65] Islam MA, Tan I, Benhouria A, Asif M, Hameed BH. Mesoporous and adsorptive properties of palm date seed activated carbon prepared via sequential hydrothermal carbonization and sodium hydroxide activation. Chem Eng J 2015; 270: 187-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.058
[66] Liang JL, Liu YH, Zhang J. Effect of solution pH on the carbon microsphere synthesized by hydrothermal carbonization. Procedia Environ Sci 2011; 11: 1322-1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.198

Downloads

Published

2016-10-17

How to Cite

Machado, N., Castro, D. de, Queiroz, L., Santos, M., & Costa, C. da. (2016). Production and Characterization of Energy Materials with Adsorbent Properties by Hydrothermal Processing of Corn Stover with Subcritical H2O. Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 5(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5030.2016.05.03.2

Issue

Section

Special Issue: Conversion of Biomass into Biofuels with Supercritical Fluids