The LiiNK Project®: Comparisons of Recess, Physical Activity, and Positive Emotional States in Grades K-2 Children

Authors

  • Laura E. Clark Department of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University
  • Deborah J. Rhea Department of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2017.06.02.1

Keywords:

Sedentary Behavior, Play, Positivity, Pedometers, Early Childhood

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the physical activity patterns and emotional states differences among elementary school students at two private schools with differently structured school days. Students at one school received the LiiNK Project® pilot intervention, which included an additional two 15-minute recess breaks (unstructured outdoor play) throughout the school day and a 15-minute character development lesson three to four times weekly. Students at the comparison school received only one 30-minute recess daily and no additional character development curriculum. Grades K-2 children from two schools (N=262) wore pedometers for one school week and were observed for emotional expressions during recess. A univariate ANOVA revealed that intervention school students took significantly more steps on average than comparison school students, F(1, 260)=0.784, p<0.0001. Significant interactions were found for average number of steps between school and grade, F(2, 250)=4.298, p<0.05, school and gender, F(1, 250)=4.660, p<0.05, and grade and gender, F(2, 250)=6.919, p<0.001. Another univariate ANOVA revealed that during recess, intervention school students displayed significantly higher percentages of positive emotions than comparison school children, F(1, 52)=15.332, p<0.0001 and significantly lower percentages of not-positive emotions than comparison school students, F(1, 52)=13.900, p<0.0001. Overall, K-2 students who received multiple recesses and a character curriculum called Positive Action were significantly more active during the school day and displayed higher percentages of positive emotions on the playground than comparison school students.

References

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School health policies and practices study: 2014 Overview. Atlanta, GA: U.S. HHS 2015.
[2] Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8(98): 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-98
[3] Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, Layden J, Carnes BA, Broday J, et al. A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(11): 1138-45.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr043743
[4] Ahn S, Fedewa A. A meta-analysis of the relationship between children’s physical activity and mental health. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36: 385-97.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq107
[5] Gray P. What have we done to childhood? Free to learn: Why unleashing the instinct to play will make our children happier, more self-reliant, and better students for life (1-12). New York: Basic Books 2013.
[6] Stegelin DA, Fite K, Wisneski D. The critical place of play in education. A Collaboration Between the US Play Coalition and the Association of Childhood Education International 2015.
[7] Ramstetter C, Murray R. Time to play: Recognizing the benefits of recess. American Educ 2017; 17-23.
[8] Milteer RM, Ginsburg KR. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bond: Focus on children in poverty. Pediatr 2011; 129(1): e204-13.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2953
[9] ASCD. Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child; A collaborative approach to learning and health. 2014 [cited 15 March 2017]: Available from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/ siteASCD/publications/wholechild/wscc-a-collaborative-approach.pdf
[10] Durlak JA, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Weissbert RP, Schellinger KB. The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev 2011; 82(1): 405-32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
[11] Garner PW, Mahatmya D, Brown EL, Vesely CK. Promoting desirable outcomes among culturally and ethnically diverse children in social emotional learning programs: A multilevel heuristic model. Educ Psychol Rev 2014; 26: 165-89.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9253-7
[12] Rhea, DJ. Recess: The forgotten classroom. Instructional Leader J 2016; 29(1): 1-4.
[13] CDC. Data table of stature-for-age charts. 2001 [cited 2015 Jan 1]: Available from http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ html_charts/statage.htm
[14] CDC. Data Table of Weight-for-age Charts. 2001 [cited 2015 Jan 1]: Available from http://www.cdc.gov/weightcharts/ html_charts/statage.htm
[15] Durbin CE. Validity of young children’s self-reports of their emotion in response to structured laboratory tasks. Emotion 2010; 10: 519-35.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019008
[16] Klinker CD, Schipperijn J, Christian H, Kerr J, Ersboll AK, Troelsen J. Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children’s school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014; 11: 8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-8
[17] Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Physical activity facts healthy schools 2014. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/physicalactivity/facts.htm
[18] Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Childhood Obesity: The Challenge. 2013 [cited 20 March 2017]: Available from http://www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/program- areas/childhood-obesity/the-challenge.html
[19] Katzmarzyk PT, Denstel KD, Beals K, Bolling C, Wright C, Crouter SE, et al. Results from the United States of America’s 2016 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. J Phys Act Health 2016; 13: S307-13.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0321
[20] LeBlanc AG, Katzmarzyk PT, Barreira TV, Broyles ST, Chaput J, Church TS, et al. Correlates of total sedentary time and screen time in 9-11 year-old children around the world; The international study of childhood obesity, lifestyle, and the environment. Lifestyle and the Environment. PLOS ONE 2015; 10(6): 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129622
[21] Rhea DJ, Rivchun AP. The LiiNK Project: Year 2 effects of multiple recesses and character curriculum on classroom behaviors and listening skills in K-2 children. Int J Play [in press].
[22] Izard CE. Facial expressions and the regulation of emotions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 58(3): 487-98.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.487
[23] Van der Niet AG, Smith J, Scherder EJ, Oosteriaan J, Harman E, Visscher C. Associations between daily physical activity and executive functioning in primary school-aged children. J Sci Med Sport 2015; 18(6); 673-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.006

Downloads

Published

2017-05-24

Issue

Section

General Articles