The Health Status of Dentists Exposed to Mercury from Silver Amalgam Tooth Restorations

Authors

  • Thomas G. Duplinsky Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, USA
  • Domenic V. Cicchetti Child Study Center and Departments of Biometry and Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2012.01.01.01

Keywords:

Pharmacy Utilization, Mortality Studies, Mercury Exposure., Dentists' Health Status

Abstract

The authors employed pharmacy utilization data to evaluate the health status of a representative sample of 600 dentists, matched to control subjects, for gender, age, geographical area, and insurance plan structure. Dentists demonstrated significantly more prescription utilization of specific illness medications than did Controls, for the following disease categories: Neuropsychological, Neurological, Respiratory, and Cardiovascular. The greater majority of pediatric and general practice dentists still use mercury amalgam restorations. This places them at greater risk than the general population for those disorders, as well as threatening the future health of America’s children and adults who continue to receive silver amalgam restorations.

References

Enwonwu CO. Potential health hazard of use of mercury in dentistry: Critical review of the literature. Environ Res 1987; 4: 257-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(87)80027-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(87)80027-0

Pleva J. Dental mercury – A public health hazard. Rev Environ Health 1994; 10: 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.1994.10.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.1994.10.1.1

Aaronson AM, Lind B, Nylander M, Nordberg M. Dental amalgam and mercury. Biol Met 1989; 2: 25-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01116197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01116197

Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Hursch JB, Nylander M. The prediction of intake of mercury vapor from amalgams. In: Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Sager PR, editors. Biological monitoring of toxic metals. New York, NY: Plenum, 1998; pp. 247-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0961-1_9

Patterson JE, Weissberg B, Dennison PJ. Mercury in human breath from dental amalgam. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1985; 34: 459-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01609761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609761

Svare CW, Peterson LC, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Frank CW, Gay DD, et al. Effect of dental amalgam on mercury levels in expired air. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 1668-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600090601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600090601

Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985; 6: 1072-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640081001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640081001

Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Dental amalgam mercury daily dose estimated from intra-oral vapor measurements: A predictor of mercury accumulation in human tissues. J Trace Elements Exp Med 1990; 3: 111-23.

Friberg L, editor. Environmental health criteria 118, Inorganic mercury. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO 1991.

Chang JB, Siew C, Gruninger SE. Factors affecting blood mercury concentration in practicing dentists. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 66-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710011101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710011101

Martin MD, Naleway C, Chou HN. Factors contributing to mercury exposure in dentists. J Amer Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1502-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0079

Naleway C, Sakaguchi R, Mitchell E, Muller T, Ayer WA, Hefferren JJ. Urinary mercury levels in US dentists, 1975-1983: Review of health assessment programs. J Amer Dent Assoc 1985; 111: 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0069

Bureau of Economic Research and Statistics: Mortality of dentists. J Amer Dent Assoc 1975; 90: 195-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0043

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 1978. Occupational mortality, 1970-1972, decennial supplement. London, UI: OPCS.

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 1986. Occupational mortality, 1979-1980. 1982-1983, decennial supplement. London OPCS.

Leigh JP, Estimates of the probability of job related death in 347 occupations. J Occup Med 1987; 29: 510-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888487014003002

Orner G. Mortality study of dentists, final report prepared for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Philadelphia: Temple University Health Science Center, School of Dentistry. 1976 DHEW, PHS, CDC, DHEW contract HSM -99-72-72.

Berry TG, Summit JB, Chung AK, Osborne JW. Amalgam at the new millennium. J Amer Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1547-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0101

McComb D. Occupational exposure to mercury in dentistry and dentist mortality. J Can Dent Assoc 1997; 63: 372-76.

Dodes JE. The Amalgam controversy, an evidence-based analysis. J Amer Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 348-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0178

Uzzell BP, Oler J. Chronic low-level mercury exposure and neuropsychological functioning. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1986; 8: 581-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01688638608405177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638608405177

Shapiro IM, Cornblath DR, Sumner AJ, et al. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological function in mercury-exposed dentists. Lancet 1982; I: 1147-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92226-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92226-7

Balarajan R. Inequities in health within the health sector. Br Med J 1989; 29: 822-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6703.822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6703.822

Langworth S, Sallsten G, Barregard L, Cynkier L, Lind ML, Soderman E. Exposure to mercury vapor and impact on health in the dental profession in Sweden. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1397-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760071001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760071001

Mandel ID. Occupational risks in dentistry: Comforts and concerns. J Amer Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 41-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0215

Orner G. The quality of life of the dentist. Int Dent J 1978; 28: 320-26.

Zwemer JD, Williams J. Dentists’ health status and risks. J Amer Coll Dent 1987; 54: 7-12.

Echeverria D, Aposhian HV, Woods JS, et al. Neurobehavioral effects from exposure to dental amalgam Hg: New distinctions between recent exposure and Hg body burden. FASEB J 1998; 12: 971-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.12.11.971

Gordis L, Epidemiology. New York: WB. Saunders Company, 1996; pp. 35-46.

Toothaker LE. Multiple comparisons for researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1991.

Kimura D. Right temporal lobe damage. Arch Neurol 1963; 8: 264-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1963.00460030048004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1963.00460030048004

Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R (revised) version manual-I. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine 1977.

Meyer-Baron M, Schaeper M, Seeber A. A meta-analysis for neurobehavioral results due to occupational mercury exposure. Arch Toxicol 2002; 76: 127-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-002-0327-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-002-0327-9

Liang YX, Sun RK, Sun Y, Chen ZQ, Li LH. Psychological effects of low exposure to mercury vapor: Application of a valuation system. Environ Res 1993; 60: 320-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1993.1040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1993.1040

Meyer-Baron M, Schaeper M, van Thriel C, Seeber A. Neurobehavioral test results and exposure to inorganic mercury: In search of dose-response relations. Arch Toxicol 2004; 78: 207-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-003-0531-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-003-0531-2

Jones L, Bunnell J, Stillman J. A 30-year follow-up of residual effects on New Zealand School dental nurses, from occupation mercury exposure. Human Exper Toxicol 2007; 26: 367-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327107076824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327107076824

Bellinger DC, Daniel D, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, McKinley S. Dental amalgam restorations and children’s neuropsychological function. The New England children’s amalgam trial. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 115: 440-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9497

DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 1784-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.15.1784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.15.1784

Lauterbach M, Martins IP, Castro-Caldas A, et al. Neurological outcomes in children with and without amalgam-related mercury exposure: Seven years of longitudinal observations in a randomized trial. J Amer Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 138-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0128

O’Carroll RE, Masterton G, Dougall N, Ebmeier P, Goodwin GM. The neuropsychiatric sequelae of mercury poisoning: The Mad Hatter’s disease revisited. Br J Psychiat 1995; 16: 95-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.1.95

Yates F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the X2 test. J Royal Stat Soc Suppl 1934; I: 217-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2983604

Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428

Cicchetti DV, Showalter D, Rourke BP, Fuerst D. A computer program for analyzing ordinal trends with dichotomous outcomes: Application to neuropsychological research. Clin Neuropsychol 1992; 6: 458-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854049208401871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049208401871

Fisher RA. The design of experiments. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd; 1935.

Clarkson TW. Mercury. J Amer Coll Toxicol 1989; 8: 1291-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10915818909009120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818909009120

CRA Newsletter (Dec., 2001). Vol. 25, Issue 12. Available from www.cranews.org: a publication of CR Foundation www.cliniciansreport.org

Engle JH, Ferracane JL, Wichmann J, Okabe T. Quantitation of total mercury vapor released during dental procedures. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 176-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90078-Q DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90078-Q

Ely BM, The future of dental amalgam: A review of the literature. Part 2: Mercury vapor released during dental procedures. Br Dent J 1997; 192: 293-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809370

Pohl L, Bergman M. The dentist’s exposure to elemental mercury vapor during clinical work with amalgam. Acta Odontol Scandinavica 1995; 53: 44-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005944

Cicchetti DV, Kaufman AS, Sparrow SS. The relationship between prenatal and postnatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioral deficits: A critical appraisal Psychol Schools 2004; 41: 589-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20000

Kaufman AS. Do low levels of lead produce IQ loss in children? A careful examination of the literature. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 303-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00084-6

Pocock SJ, Smith M, Baghurst P. Environmental lead and children’s intelligence: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1189-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6963.1189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6963.1189

Schwartz J. Low level lead exposure and children’s IQ: A meta-analysis and search for a threshold. Environ Res 1994; 65: 42-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1994.1020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1994.1020

Kristensen P, Bjerkedal T. Explaining the relation between birth order and intelligence. Science 2007; 316: 1717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1141493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141493

Sulloway FJ. Birth order and intelligence. Science 2007; 317: 1711-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144749

Downloads

Published

2012-10-02

How to Cite

Duplinsky, T. G. ., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2012). The Health Status of Dentists Exposed to Mercury from Silver Amalgam Tooth Restorations. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2012.01.01.01

Issue

Section

General Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)