Examining the Linkage of Academic Performance and Attention by Uddin's Numeral Finding and Typo Revealing Tests: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study in Undergraduate Students of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Md. Assadik Alam Department of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka
  • Md. Sahab Uddin Department of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka
  • G.M. Sala Uddin Department of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka
  • Farzana Yasmin Swapna Department of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka
  • Md. Shah Amran Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Dhaka, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2018.06.04.1

Keywords:

Attention, Cognitive functions, Academic performance, Academic life, Numeral finding test, Typo revealing test.

Abstract

Background: Attention is the state of applying the concentration to something and it's strongly linked to academic performance. The drive of this study was to analyze the academic performance and attention of undergraduate students.

Methods: The study was implemented on 139 undergraduate students of Bangladesh selected from 9 universities from April to August 2018. In this study to investigate the attention of the students, the Uddin's Numeral Finding (NF) and Typo Revealing (TR) tests were used.

Results: In the NF test male students with last semester cumulative grade point average (CGPA) of 3.47 (highest) exerted the maximum 40% attention but female students exerted only 33.3% attention and their last semester CGPA was 3. Students with age > 22 years exerted maximum, 70.55%, and 35.2% attention in NF and TR tests respectively with last semester CGPA of 3.56 (maximum). In the NF and TR tests, highest, 89.73%, and 50.33% attention respectively were reported by 1st-year students with last semester CGPA of only 3.70. High-socioeconomic status students with last semester CGPA of 3.43 (lowest) exerted maximum 75.30% attention in NF test. There were no significant associations between variables.

Conclusion: Attention is a very rudimentary function that often is a forerunner to cognitive functions. Individual differences in academic performance have been linked to differences in attention and intelligence.

References

[1] Anderson JR. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Worth Publishers, New York 2004.
[2] Denckla MB. Biological Correlates of Learning and Attention: What Is Relevant to Learning Disability and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics 1996; 17: 114-119.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-199604000-00011
[3] Uddin MS, Asaduzzaman M. Innovation and Validation of Neuropsychopharmacological Testing Methods for the Assessment of Memory, Attention and Cognition in Human Participants. Neuroscience and Medicine 2016; 7(3): 83-84.
https://doi.org/10.4236/nm.2016.73010
[4] Bachmann T. Attention as a Process of Selection, Perception as a Process of Representation, and Phenomenal Experience as the Resulting Process of Perception Being Modulated by a Dedicated Consciousness Mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology 2011; 2: 387.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00387
[5] CogniFit. Attention: One of Our Cognitive Domains. Available: https://www.cognifit.com/attention
[6] Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. China: Elsevier Saunders 2006.
[7] Wilson K, James HK. Attention During Lectures: Beyond Ten Minutes. Teaching of Psychology 2007; 34(2): 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830703400202
[8] Wang W. Factors Affecting Learners' Attention to Teacher Talk in Nine ESL Classrooms. Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language 2015; 19(1): 1-20.
[9] Archer L. Younger Academics’ Constructions of ‘Authenticity’,‘Success’ and Professional Identity. Studies in Higher Education 2008; 33(4): 385-403.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802211729
[10] Ward A, Stoker HW, Murray-Ward M. Achievement and ability tests-Definition of the domain. Educational Measurement 1996; 2: 2-5.
[11] Von Stumm S, Hell B, Chamorro-Premuzic T. The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2011; 6(6): 574-88.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611421204
[12] Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist 1990; 25(1): 3-17.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
[13] Shaw P, Greenstein D, Lerch J, Clasen L, Lenroot R, Gogtay NE, Evans A, Rapoport J, Giedd J. Intellectual Ability and Cortical Development in Children and Adolescents. Nature 2006; 440(7084): 676-9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04513
[14] Holmes A, Silvestri R. Rates of Mental Illness and Associated Academic Impacts in Ontario’s college students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 2016; 31(1): 27-46.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573515601396
[15] Johansen NB. New Research on Short-term Memory Book. New York: Nova Science Publishers 2008.
[16] Furnham A, Chamorro-Premuzic T, McDougall F. Personality, Cognitive Ability, and Beliefs about Intelligence as Predictors of Academic Performance. Learning and Individual Differences 2003; 14(1): 47-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.002
[17] Lent RW, Brown SD, Gore Jr PA. Discriminant and Predictive Validity of Academic Self-Concept, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Mathematics-Specific Self-Efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1997; 44(3): 307.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.3.307
[18] Janssen J. Academic Procrastination: Prevalence among High School and Undergraduate Students and Relationship to Academic Achievement. Available: https://scholarworks. gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=epse_diss
[19] Brockman MS, Russell ST. Academic Success. Building Partnership for Youth National 4H Council and the University Of Arizona. Available: http://calscf.calsnet.arizona.edu/fcs/ bpy/content.cfm?content=academic_success
[20] Mahmud MM. Communication aptitude and academic success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 134: 125-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.230
[21] Hijazi ST, Naqvi SM. Factors Affecting Students' Performance. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology 2006; 3(1): 1-10.
[22] Uddin MS, Mamun AA, Asaduzzaman M. Innovation of Neuropsychopharmacological Experimental Methods to Investigate Attention in Human Participants and It’s Validation by Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science 2016; 6(7): 280-293.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2016.67028
[23] Rivkin SG, Hanushek EA, Kain JF. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 2005; 73(2): 417-58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
[24] Uddin MS. Brain Chemistry and Sex Differences: Are Male and Female Brains Really Varied? Neurochemistry & Neuropharmacology 2018; 4(1): 1-3.
[25] Merritt P, Hirshman E, Wharton W, Stangl B, Devlin J, Lenz A. Evidence for gender differences in visual selective attention. Personality and Individual Differences 2007; 43(3): 597-609.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.016
[26] Haier RJ, Jung RE, Yeo RA, Head K, Alkire MT. Structural Brain Variation and General Intelligence. Neuroimage 2004; 23(1): 425-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.025
[27] Madden DJ. Aging and Visual Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007; 16(2): 70-74.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00478.x
[28] Bialystok E, Craik MIF. Lifespan Cognition: Mechanisms of Change. UK: Oxford University Press 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.001.0001
[29] Charles S, Carstensen LL. Social and Emotional Aging. Annual Review of Psychology 2010; 61: 383-409.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100448
[30] O’halloran AM, Finucane C, Savva GM, Robertson IH, Kenny RA. Sustained Attention and Frailty in the Older Adult Population. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2013; 69(2): 147-56.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt009
[31] Ruff HA, Lawson KR. Development of Sustained, Focused Attention in Young Children During Free Play. Developmental Psychology 1990; 26(1): 85-93.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.85
[32] David Cornish M, Dukette D. The essential 20: Twenty Components of an Excellent Health Care Team. United States: Dorrance Publishing 2009.
[33] Shah SM, Saleem S. Level of Attention of Secondary School Students and Its Relationship with their Academic Achievement. Journal of Arts and Humanities 2015; 4(5): 92-106.
[34] Nicholls JG. Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience, Task Choice, and Performance. Psychological Review 1984; 91(3): 328-346.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
[35] Breslau J. Poor Attention In Kindergarten Predicts Lower High School Test Scores. Medical Journal Pediatrics 2009; 44(3): 210-214.
[36] Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology 2002; 53(1): 371-99.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
[37] Engle PL, Black MM. The Effect of Poverty on Child Development and Educational Outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008; 1136(1): 243-56.
https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1425.023
[38] Hair NL, Hanson JL, Wolfe BL, Pollak SD. Association of Child Poverty, Brain Development, and Academic Achievement. JAMA Pediatrics 2015; 169(9): 822-829.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1475
[39] Duncan GJ, Magnuson K, Kalil A, Ziol-Guest K. The Importance of Early Childhood Poverty. Social Indicators Research 2012; 108(1): 87-98.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9867-9
[40] Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic Status & Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology 2002; 53: 371-399.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
[41] Schoon I, Jones E, Cheng H, Maughan B. Family Hardship, Family Instability, and Cognitive Development. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2012; 66: 716-722.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.121228
[42] Strenze T. Intelligence and Socioeconomic Success: A Meta-Analytic Review of Longitudinal Research. Intelligence 2007; 35: 401-426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

General Articles