Features of the Introduction in Schools of Nonverbal Communication Development Programme for Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Authors

  • Oksana V. Zashchirinskaia Department of Pedagogics and Pedagogical Psychology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.6

Keywords:

Students with intellectual disabilities, inclusive education, nonverbal communication methods, children with special educational needs.

Abstract

Objective: The present study was conducted to identify the features of nonverbal communication in children.

Background: Nonverbal communication is a significant aspect of interpersonal communication. American scientists have found a strong correlation between low ability to recognise facial expressions, interpretation of postures, and gestures with communication difficulties. Experimental data indicate a positive relationship between the social status of an individual and the ability to interpret nonverbal signals. The general dynamics of the development of a child with disabilities are subject to the same laws as ordinary children. But the peculiarities of children associated with a disturbance of the intellectual sphere lead to the limitation of possibilities to obtain information from the outside world, a change in the methods of communication, difficulties of social adaptation, and impoverishment of social experience.

Method: Students of the first-grades of educational institutions of St. Petersburg were the survey sample. Several public and special schools were randomly selected in order to form the most detailed picture of the development of nonverbal behaviour in children, as well as to obtain the most representative sample for our study. A total of 128 children took part in the study – students of the first-grade (average age – 7.4 years; 47 girls, 81 boys).

Results: A programme of psychological influence was developed to optimise the nonverbal communication of children with intellectual disabilities.

Conclusion: With psychological influence aimed at the development of nonverbal communication among primary schoolers with intellectual disabilities, more intact mental functions associated with the implementation of emotional and behavioural components were taken into account.

References

Wieland N, Green S, Ellingsen R, Baker BL. Parent-child problem solving in families of children with or without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2014; 58: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12009

van der Ende J, Verhulst FC, Tiemeier H. Agreement of informants on emotional and behavioral problems from childhood to adulthood. Psychological Assessment 2012; 24: 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025500

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2016; 15(2): 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Zashchirinskaia OV. Nonverbal communication of persons with mental retardation: theoretical outline of the problem from the standpoint of the cognitive-behavioral approach. Nauka. Thought: electronic periodical journal 2016; 6 (2): 80-87.

Maller AR. The problem of integrating children with severe developmental disorders. Special Education 2015; 1(11): 190-193.

Mulatova NA, Ryabenchenko NN. Inclusive education of children with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Experimental Education 2016; 4: 259-261.

Metsala JL, Galway TM, Ishaik G, Barton VE. Emotion knowledge, emotion regulation, and psychosocial adjustment in children with nonverbal learning disabilities. Child Neuropsychology 2017; 23: 609-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2016.1205012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2016.1205012

Bunning K, Smith C, Kennedy P, Grennham C. Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2013; 57(1): 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01513.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01513.x

Shamma A. Non Verbal Communication Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations 2018; 6: 24

Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2014; 11(1): 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543

Vitaskova K, Rihova A. Analysis of impaired nonverbal communication in people with autism spectrum disorder. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach 2013; 3(2): 87-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/SW.2013.28227

Konst MJ, Matson JL, Goldin RL, Williams LW. Socialisation and nonverbal communication in atypically developing infants and toddlers. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014; 35: 3416-3422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.024

Aderka IM, Appelbaum-Namdar E, Shafran N, Gilboa-Schechtman EA communication-based intervention for nonverbal children with autism: What changes? Who benefits? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2011; 79(4): 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024112

Floyd FJ, Olsen DL. Family-peer linkages for children with intellectual disability and children with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2017; 52: 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.08.001

Barton-Hulsey A, Sevcik RA, Romski M. Narrative language and reading comprehension in students with mild intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2017; 122(5): 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.5.392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.5.392

Shalev M, Hetzroni OE. Factors predicting school staff's responsivity toward students with intellectual and developmental disability and complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103677

Rodgers JD, Warhol A, Fox JD, McDonald CA, Thomeer ML, Lopata C, Sheffield T. Minimal risk of internalising problems in typically developing siblings of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2016; 25(8): 2554-2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0407-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0407-8

Derrick B, White P. Comparing two samples from an individual Likert question. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 2018; 18(3): 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-27

How to Cite

Zashchirinskaia, O. V. (2020). Features of the Introduction in Schools of Nonverbal Communication Development Programme for Children with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(4), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.6

Issue

Section

Monographic - Features of Non-Verbal Communication in Children with Intellectual Disabilities