Spiritual Culture Formation of Young Teachers in the System of Higher Education: The Way for Social Maturity Development

Authors

  • Zhannur Asetova Karaganda State University Named after E.A. Buketov, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Saltanat Abildina Karaganda State University Named after E.A. Buketov, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Albina Zh. Anesova Pavlodar State University Named after S. Toraighyrov, Pavlodar, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zaure Kystaubayeva Kazakh University of Technology and Business, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Anar Ryskeldina Karaganda State University Named after E.A. Buketov, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.7

Keywords:

Social relations assimilation, level of knowledge, spiritual culture, pedagogical environment.

Abstract

The formation of spiritual culture should be based on the principles that guide every teacher in the implementation of their pedagogical skills in direct learning. The purpose of our study is to substantiate that young teachers' social maturity is characterized not only by the level of knowledge, development of their orientations but also by the degree of personal spiritual culture. We have applied the method of diagnosing a level of young teacher's social maturity development as a moderator in the search for spiritual values, but also a participant in the formation of personal spiritual culture directly at the student himself. Diagnostic sections have shown that the index of general social maturity of young teachers who shape the spiritual culture of students, is growing much faster compared to the young teachers who didn't show the activity of this kind. From the experimental data, it follows that young teachers' activity in creating a pedagogical environment of their school is an effective factor in the intensification of their social maturity formation. Investigating the problem of the formation of social maturity of the individual, a certain system of personal orientations develops, which serves as the basis of spiritual culture, which the student can choose. The authors show that such an opportunity can only be implemented with the teacher's integrated participation as a carrier of moral values. The study's novelty is determined by the fact that each of the participants in the educational process seeks to realize the share and type of moral views for the fulfillment of their personal interests. The study's practical significance is determined by the fact that spiritual culture can be based not only on its private but also on its public perception.

References

Kim LE, Jörg V, Klassen RM. A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher effectiveness and burnout. Educational Psychology Review 2019; 31(1): 163-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2

Albrecht K. Social Intelligence. The New Science of Success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2006.

Rimm-Kaufman S, Hamre B. The role of psychological and developmental science in efforts to improve teacher quality. Teachers College Record 2010; 112(12): 2988-3023.

Maslou A. Motivation and personality. Saint Petersburg: Yevraziya 2001.

Alarcon G, Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA. Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work and Stress 2009; 23(3): 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903282600

Brown CG. A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout in teachers. Educational and Child Psychology 2012; 29: 47-63.

Radul VV. Personality’s social maturity. Kharkiv: Machulin 2017.

Lebedyk MP. Public evaluation of pedagogical university students based on personality’s social maturity. Poltava: PGPI 1987.

Liashenko RO. Category characteristics of personality self-determination. Innovative Solutions in Modern Science 2017; 2(11): 1-14.

Mulyar VI. Personality’s self-realization as a social process: (methodological, sociological aspect). Kyiv: T. Shevchenko KGU 1990.

Safin VF. Psychology of personality self-determination. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskiy Ped institute 1986.

Fromm E. Human for oneself. Moscow: Progress 1992.

Welder RK. On issue of the subconscious aggressiveness phenomenon. Social Sciences and Modernity 1993; 3: 183-190.

Leontiev AN. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat 1997.

Vygotsky LS. Selected psychological studies. Moscow: APN RSFSR Publishing 1956.

Vygotsky LS. Psychology of art. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks 1998.

Radul VV. Teacher's personality social maturity: factors of formation. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola 2008.

Buchanan J, Prescott A, Schuck S, Aubusson P, Burke P. Teacher retention and attrition: Views of early career teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2013; 38(3): 112-129. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n3.9

Ilyenkov EV. What is a personality? Moscow: Politizdat 1984.

Sartr ZhP. Being and nothing. Experience of phenomenological ontology. Moscow: Progress 2000.

Goldstein K. Human nature in the light of psychopathology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 2014.

Asmolov AG. Psychology of personality. Moscow: MGU Publishing 1990.

Platonov KK. A brief vocabulary of psychological concepts system. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola 1984.

Levin K. The relationship of local education systems with the nationwide. Moscow: Pedagogika 1974.

Frankl V. Human in search of meaning. Moscow: Progress 1990.

Freyd Z. Psychoanalysis. Religion. Culture. Moscow: Progress 1992.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-27

How to Cite

Asetova, Z., Abildina, S., Anesova, A. Z., Kystaubayeva, Z., & Ryskeldina, A. (2020). Spiritual Culture Formation of Young Teachers in the System of Higher Education: The Way for Social Maturity Development. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(4), 650–656. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.7

Issue

Section

General Articles