Methodological Guidelines for the Deontological Adaptation of Future Teachers in the Education Process

Authors

  • Kasenov Khanat Faculty of Social Sciences, Eurasian National University. L.N. Gumilyov, Nur-Sultan City, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Urazbayeva Gulsara Department of Social Pedagogy and Self-Knowledge, Eurasian National University. L.N. Gumilyov, NurSultan City, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Tusupbekova Madina Department of Pedagogical Sciences, Eurasian National University. L.N. Gumilyov, Nur-Sultan City, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zhusupova Roza Eurasian National University. L.N. Gumilyov, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Tugelbayeva Gulmira Military Institute of Land Forces, Head of Natural Sciences Departmen, Almaty City, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.23

Abstract

The methodological guidelines of deontological adaptation of future teachers in the education process are considered: the main vectors of adaptation processes to learning, the mechanisms of professional semantic generation, and adaptation algorithms.

This article presents the research of a pedagogical experience of teacher training on the subject of Deontology adaptation, a curricular unit which is part of the education degrees taught at Eurasian National University named after Gumilev (Kazakhstan).

The foundation of the curricular unit and its characteristics are presented, as well as the analysis of the students' evaluation of its teaching effects as perceived by them. The data analysis, based on some contents of a portfolio, shows a considerable positive perception of those effects.

The purpose of the research is to determine and substantiate the study's methodology and develop the organizational and methodological support for the deontological training of bachelor's education as the basis for the formation of their deontological competence and personal and professional development.

References

Voicu AV, Levi A. Necesitatea abordarii problematicii integrarii sociale a excelentului în sport din perspectiva unei pedagogii juridice de domeniu. Revista Ştiinţa sportului 2003.

Voiculescu E. Evaluarea şcolară şi deontologia profesiunii didactice. In Ionescu M, Chiş V, (coord.), Studii de pedagogie. Omagiu profesorului Dumitru Salade. Cluj-Napoca: Ed. Presa Universitară Clujeană 2000.

Gusdorf G. Professores, para quê? 2nd edition. Lisboa: Moraes Editores. Original version: 1963. Pourquoi des professeurs? Paris: Payot 1970.

Reboul O. O que é aprender? Coimbra: Livraria Almedina. Original version: 1980. Qu’est-ce qu’apprendre? Pour une philosophie de l’enseignement. Paris: PUF 1982.

Lago Bornstein JC. La ética en la formación de los profesores. In Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado 1989; 417-425.

Torres CA. e Colaboradores. Educação, poder e biografia pessoal. Diálogos com educadores críticos. Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora 2000.

Veiga MA. Um perfil ético para educadores. Braga: Palimage Editores 2005.

Severino AJ, Fazenda ICA, (Orgs). Formação docente: Rupturas e possibilidades. S. Paulo: Papirus Editora 2002.

Baptista I. Dar rosto ao futuro. A educação como compromisso ético. Porto: Profedições 2005.

Alarcão I. Professores Reflexivos em uma Escola Reflexiva. 2nd edition. S. Paulo: Cortez Editora 2003.

Santos JMF, dos. Valores e Deontologia Docente. Um estudo empírico. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 2008; 47(2): 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35362/rie4722368

Seiça A. A docência como praxis ética e deontológica: um estudo empírico. Lisboa: Instituto de Inovação Educacional/ Departamento de Educação Básica 2003.

Estrela MT, Marques J, Alves FC, Feio M. Formação etico‑deontologica de professores do ensino superior ‒ Subsídios para um debate. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação, 7, Set.-Dez., 2008; pp. 89-100.

Caetano AP, Silva M. de L. Ética profissional e formação de professores. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação 2009; 8: 49-60.

Marin S. Politici şi strategii de formare a resursei umane din educaţie. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică 2013.

Alarcão I. Professores Reflexivos em uma Escola Reflexiva. 2nd edition. S. Paulo:Cortez Editora 2003.

Aristotle. Ética a Nicómaco. Lisboa: Quetzal Editores 2004.

Slastenin VA. Formation of Socio-Active Personality of a Teacher, Sovetskaya Pedagogika, Moscow 1981.

Nikitina NN, Kislinskaya NV. Introduction to Pedagogical Activity: Theory and Practice, Academia, Moscow 2004.

Kandibovich LA, Dyachenko MI. Higher Education Psychology, Minsk 1981.

Braga F. Formação de Professores e Identidade Profissional. Coimbra: Quarteto Editora 2001.

Buckeridge J, Grünwald N. “Ethics and the Professional: A Template for International Benchmarking in Engineering Education”. Global Journal of Engineering Education 2003; 7(1): 51-57.

Heidegger M. Être et temps. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. Original version: 1949, Seinund Zeit, Neomarius Verlag : Tübingen. 1st edition: 1986; 1927.

Levinas E. Autrement que’être ou au-delà de l’essence. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1111-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1111-7

Levinas E. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’exteriorité. 2nd ed. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff 1965.

Theunissen M. The Other. Studies on the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Cambrige, Massachusetts/London, England: MIT Press 1984.

Nédoncelle M. Sensation séparatrice et dynamisme temporel des consciences. Paris: Bloud and Gay 1977.

Nédoncelle M. Intersubjectivité et ontologie. Le défi personnaliste. Paris: Beatrice-Nauwelaerts 1974.

Nédoncelle M. Personne humaine et nature. Étude logique et métaphysique. Paris: Aubier-Éditions Montaigne 1963.

Freire P. Pedagogia da Esperança. Um reencontro com a Pedagogia do Oprimido. S. Paulo: Paz e Terra 2003.

Downie RS. Professions and Professionalism. In Fenner, D. E. W., Ethics in Education. New York/ London: Garland Publishing 1999; pp. 3-22.

Caetano AP, Silva M. de L. Ética profissional e formação de professores. Sísifo. Revista de Ciências da Educação 2009; 8: 49-60.

Brăescu V-S. Elemente de deontologie a evaluării în contextul creşterii calităţii actului educaţional 2009.

Callejo J. El Grupo de Discusión: Introducción a una práctica de investigación. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v3i1.91

Cunha P. d’. Ética e Educação. Lisboa: Universidade Católica Editora 1996.

Dewhurst D. The Teacher’s Point of View. In Fenner, D. E. W., Ethics in Education. New York/ London: Garland Publishing 1999; pp. 23-39.

Downie RS. Professions and Professionalism. In Fenner, D. E. W., Ethics in Education. New York/ London: Garland Publishing 1999; pp. 3-22.

Monteiro AR. Deontologia das Profissões da Educação. Coimbra: Almedina 2005.

Van der Maren J-M. Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation. 2nd edition. Paris/ Brussels : De Boeck Université 1996.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-09

How to Cite

Khanat, K. ., Gulsara, U. ., Madina, T. ., Roza, Z. ., & Gulmira, T. . (2020). Methodological Guidelines for the Deontological Adaptation of Future Teachers in the Education Process. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(4), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.23

Issue

Section

General Articles