Artistic Memorial Facilities as a Phenomenon of Impact on Emotional Psychological Perception of People

Authors

  • Kanybekova Karlygash International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • Y. Roslykova International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • M. Kulbayeva International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • K. Koshkimbayev International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • A. Elantsev International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • R. Shaikynbekova International Kazakh Turkish University named after KH. A. Yassawi, Kazakhstan
  • L. Umbetyarova Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.03.12

Keywords:

Mausoleum, funerary construction, necropolis, architectural style, Kazakhstan, people, impact

Abstract

The interplay between architectural design and human psychology is significant, yet it remains largely unnoticed or even ignored both in and outside the design industry. Moreover, the relationship between design and psychology is not only consequential and is bidirectional. On the one hand, successful design has been shown to have clear psychological and physiological impacts; on the other, psychology, human experience, and the function of our neurological systems all play a significant role in what we perceive to be a successful design. This thesis endeavors to understand how that complex relationship evolved and how it works in today's world and shows how artistic memorial facilities can help emotionally to people.

The architectural style has evolved over time as the general public's preferences have changed and as new materials and building processes have been discovered. Some styles have been fads that have quickly come and gone, while others have stood the test of time and been around for centuries, even influencing some modern architecture today.

The socio-political, socio-cultural processes taking place in modern society require a serious rethinking of the spiritual, moral, cultural, and historical values underlying the artistic and aesthetic comprehension of the world by students.

The problem of the aesthetic education of the younger generation, the gradual revival of traditions and culture of peoples is acquiring special relevance at present.

At the same time, interest in studying the problems of introducing young people to culture, particularly works of art of architecture - architectural monuments, is of great importance. Of course, the issues of the beneficial influence of the architectural and spatial environment on the development of artistic creativity of children, instilling in schoolchildren a desire to join the national artistic culture with the help of the heritage of ancestors as a factor in the aesthetic education of schoolchildren, enrichment of their inner world are also relevant. The preceding determines the need for further research of art and pedagogical education and aesthetic education of schoolchildren based on a deep study of the heritage of their ancestors, and above all on the historical and architectural samples of cultural and art monuments.

This paper aims to show the development of artistic forms of memorial facilities in Kazakhstan and describe how it will emotionally help people. As well as depict its historical development and significance to the people. This research starts its analysis from ancient times until now with memorable periods in history.

References

Ekman, P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln. NE: University of Nebraska Press 1972; pp. 207-283.

Baitenov EM. Memorial architecture of Kazakhstan: evolution and problems of form-building. Almaty: Kazakh Head Architectural and Construction Academy, 2004.

Dezecache G, Conty L, Chadwick M, Philip L, Soussignan R, Sperber D, Grèzes J. Evidence for unintentional emotional contagion beyond dyads. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(6): e67371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067371

Bolger N, Amarel D. Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007; 92: 458-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458

Booker S, Waite BM. Humilitainment? Lessons from ‘The Apprentice’: A reality TV content analysis, presented at the

th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Los Angeles, CA 2005.

Glaudinov BA. Evolution of the architecture of Kazakhstan, Almaty: "Aleiron", 2016.

Cunningham WA, Dunfield KA, Stillman PE. Emotional states from affective dynamics. Emotion Review 2013; 5: 344-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913489749

Damasio A. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam 1994.

Edwards D. Emotion discourse. Cultural Psychology 1999; 5: 271-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001

Fischer A H, Van Kleef GA. Where have all the people gone? A plea for including social interaction in emotion research. Emotion Review 2010; 2: 208-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910361980

Fridlund AJ. Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press 1994.

Carrillo C, Flores MA. COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices, European Journal of Teacher Education 2020; 43(4): 466-487.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184

Gergen KT. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973; 26: 309-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034436

Hawk ST, Fischer AH, van Kleef GA. Face the noise: Embodied responses to nonverbal vocalizations of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012; 102: 796-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026234

Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001

Niven K, Totterdell P, Holman D. A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion 2009; 9: 498-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015962

Parrott WG, Smith RH. Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003; 64: 906-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.906

Rose AJ, Carlson W, Waller EM. Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology 2007; 43: 1019-1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019

Tamir M, Ford BQ, Gilliam M. Evidence for utilitarian motives in emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion 2013; 27: 483-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.715079

Zaki J, Williams WC. Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion 2013; 13: 803-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033839

Published

2021-06-01

How to Cite

Karlygash, K. ., Roslykova, Y. ., Kulbayeva, M. ., Koshkimbayev, K. ., Elantsev, A. ., Shaikynbekova, R. ., & Umbetyarova, . L. . (2021). Artistic Memorial Facilities as a Phenomenon of Impact on Emotional Psychological Perception of People. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 9(3), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.03.12

Issue

Section

General Articles