Forward Osmosis: Potential use in Desalination and Water Reuse

Authors

  • Ali Altaee School of Engineering University of the West of Scotland Paisley PA1 2BE, the UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2012.01.02.2

Abstract

There has been a recurring interest in using Forward Osmosis (FO) process in water treatment and desalination. Despite the promising results from pilot and bench scale experiments the technology is still not commercialized yet. This is due to the complicated nature of the process which usually involves multiple stages of treatment in addition to the FO membrane process. Unfortunately, most of the recent studies were focused on studying the FO process alone and didn’t provide enough data about the actual cost of the process as whole which includes the osmotic agent regeneration stage/s. This issue resulted in some uncertainties about the total cost of the water treatment by the process. Furthermore, more data are required to evaluate the impact of the osmotic agent losses on the overall cost and efficiency. In case if the draw solution is regenerated by membrane treatment, a suitable membrane should be selected to ensure an optimal salt rejection. For power generation by Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) process, there was an evident progress. However, the process is site specific; i.e. it is dependent of the availability of the draw and donor solution. This suggested that the process is applicable to certain areas but can’t be generalized.

References

Mohammad Al-Sahali, Hisham Ettouney. Developments in thermal desalination processes: Design, energy, and costing aspects, Desalination 2007; 214: 227-240.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.020

Ioannis C. Karagiannis, Petros G. Soldatos, Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment, Desalination 2008; 223: 448-456.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.071

Kah Peng Lee, Tom C. Arnot, Davide Mattia, A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—Development to date and future potential, Journal of Membrane Science 2011; 370: 1-22.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036

Toufic Mezher, Hassan Fath, Zeina Abbas, Arslan Khaled, Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies, Desalination 2011; 266: 263-273.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.035

Lauren F. Greenlee, Desmond F. Lawler, Benny D. Freeman, Benoit Marrot, Philippe Moulin, Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges, Water Research 2009; 43: 2317-2348.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010

Robert L. McGinnis, Menachem Elimelech, Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination, Desalination 2007; 207: 370-382.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.012

Jeffrey R. McCutcheon, Robert L. McGinnis, Menachem Elimelech, Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance, Journal of Membrane Science 2006; 278: 114-123.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.048

Kah Peng Lee, Tom C. Arnot, Davide Mattia, A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—Development to date and future potential, Journal of Membrane Science 2011; 370: 1-22.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036

Tzahi Y. Cath, Amy E. Childress, Menachem Elimelech, Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments, Journal of Membrane Science 2006; 281: 70-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048

Tai-Shung Chung, Sui Zhang, Kai Yu Wang, Jincai Su, Ming Ming Ling, Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow, Desalination 2012; 287: 78-81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.019

Jeffrey R. McCutcheon, Menachem Elimelech, Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis, Journal of Membrane Science 2006; 284: 237-247.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049

Andrea Achilli, Tzahi Y. Cath, Amy E. Childress, Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental

and theoretical investigation, Journal of Membrane Science2009;343: 42-52.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.006

Sidney Loeb, Energy production at the Dead Sea by pressure-retarded osmosis: challenge or chimera?, Desalination 1998; 120: 247-262.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00222-7

World Desalination Report, Vol 45, Issue 39, 26 October 2009.

Chuyang Y. Tang, Qianhong She, Winson C.L. Lay, Rong Wang, Anthony G. Fane, Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration, Journal of Membrane Science2010; 354: 123-133.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.059

Sidney Loeb, Leonid Titelman, Emmanuel Korngold, Joseph Freiman, Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane, Journal of Membrane Science 1997: 129: 243-249.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-7

M. A. Darwish, Hisham El-Dessouky, The heat recovery thermal vapour-compression desalting system: A comparison with other thermal desalination processes, Applied Thermal Engineering 1996; 16: 523-537.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1359-4311(95)00034-8

Ian Lomax, Experiences of Dow in the field of seawater reverse osmosis, Desalination 2008; 224: 111-118.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.085

Mark Wilf, Kenneth Klinko, Optimization of seawater RO systems design, Desalination 2001; 138: 299-306.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00278-8

Abdulsalam Al-Mayahi (Worcestor Park, GB); Adel Sharif (Guildford GB, GB). Solvent Removal Process. United States patent US 20110114558. 2011 May.

Mohamed Khayet, Membranes and theoretical modeling of membrane distillation: A review, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2011; 164: 56-88.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.09.005

Narmine H. Aly, Adel K. El-Figi, Thermal performance of seawater desalination systems, Desalination 2003; 158: 127-142.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00443-0

Jacques Andrianne, Félix Alardin, Thermal and membrane processe economics: Optimized selection for seawater desalination, Desalination 2003; 153: 305-311.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01128-1

Ahmed M. Helal, Once-through and brine recirculation MSF designs — a comparative study, Desalination 2005; 171: 33-60.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desa1.2004.02.104

Suresh Patel, Michael A. Finan, New antifoulants for deposit control in MSF and MED plants, Desalination 1999; 124: 63-74.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00089-2

Loeb S., Norman R. S. (1975). "Osmotic Power Plants". Science 2003; 189: 654–655. .http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4203.654

Loeb S, "Energy Production at the Dead Sea by Pressure-Retarded Osmosis: Challenge or Chimera?", Desalination 1998; 120: 247–262.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00222-7

Sangyoup Lee, Menachem Elimelech, Salt cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes, Water Research 2007; 415: 1134-1142.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.043

Bernard Vigneault, Peter G. C. Campbell, André Tessier and Richard De Vitre, Geochemical changes in sulfidic mine tailings stored under a shallow water cover, Water Research 2001; 35: 1066-1076.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00331-6

Mustafa, Syed, Shah, Khizar, Naeem, Abdul, Waseem, Muhammad, Ahmad, Tauqeer, Khan, Sadullah, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 2011; 217: 57-69.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

Altaee, A. (2012). Forward Osmosis: Potential use in Desalination and Water Reuse. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 1(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2012.01.02.2

Issue

Section

Articles