Evaluating the Performance of Fertilizer Draw Solutions by Using the Modified Cellulosic Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes

Authors

  • Doaa F. Ahmed Egyptian Desalination Research Center of Excellence (EDRC), Cairo, Egypt and Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt
  • Heba Isawi Desert Research Center, Water Resources and Desert Soils Division, Hydrogeochemistry Dept., Water Desalination Unit, Egyptian Desalination Research Center of Excellence (EDRC), Cairo, Egypt
  • A.A. Elbayaa Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt
  • Nagwa A. Badway Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt
  • Hosam Shawky Desert Research Center, Water Resources and Desert Soils Division, Hydrogeochemistry Dept., Water Desalination Unit, Egyptian Desalination Research Center of Excellence (EDRC), Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2020.09.01

Keywords:

Forward Osmosis Desalination, CTA/CA polymer blend, Fertilizer draws solution, brine wastewater desalination

Abstract

This paper deals with various fertilizer influences to draw solutions to the neat CTA/CA, MA/CTA/CA, and the Al2O3/MA/CTA/CA nanocomposite (NC) modified membrane. Also, the applicability of the neat CTA/CA, MA/CTA/CA, and The Al2O3/MA/CTA/CA nanocomposite (NC) modified membrane display high water flux when it used to desalinate brine water sample collected from the brine mid-stream from Mersa Matruh area, North-Western Coast of Egypt. The salinity of the collected sample is 12760 mg/L and PH (8.5) and used as FS, and 1M from different fertilizer draw solutes (DFDS) include KCl, NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4, and K2HPO4 used as DS. The results reveal that the flux was KCl and NH4Cl (17.8 L/m2.h) and followed by (NH4)2SO4 (17.1 L/m2.h) and K2HPO4 (16.6 L/m2.h) using the natural saline water as FS using Al2O3/MA/CTA/CA NC modified membrane. The reusability test of the synthesised Al2O3/MA/CTA/CA NC modified membrane showed good sustainability during the 1260 min continuous test. The FO application displayed a great potential to be interested in brine wastewater desalination and enhanced water source sustainability to use in agriculture fertigation.

References

Zou S, He Z. Enhancing wastewater reuse by forward osmosis with self-diluted commercial fertilizers as draw solutes. Water Research 2016; 99: 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.067

Ghaffour N, Missimer TM, Amy GL. Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability. Desalination 2013; 309: 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.015

Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. science 2011; 333(6043): 712-717. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200488

Zhao D, Wang P, Zhao Q, Chen N, Lu X. Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Desalination 2014; 348: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.009

Chung T-S, Zhang S, Wang KY, Su J, Ling MM. Forward osmosis processes: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination 2012; 287: 78-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.019

Su J, Zhang S, Ling MM, Chung T-S. Forward osmosis: an emerging technology for sustainable supply of clean water. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2012; 14(4): 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0486-1

Ong RC, Chung T-S. Fabrication and positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) characterisation of cellulose triacetate membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of membrane science 2012; 394: 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.046

Li G, Li X-M, He T, Jiang B, Gao C. Cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes: preparation and characterisation. Desalination and water treatment 2013; 51(13-15): 2656-2665. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.749246

Xu J, Li P, Jiao M, Shan B, Gao C. Effect of molecular configuration of additives on the membrane structure and water transport performance for forward osmosis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2016; 4(8): 4433-4441. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01039

Sairam M, Sereewatthanawut E, Li K, Bismarck A, Livingston A. Method for the preparation of cellulose acetate flat sheet composite membranes for forward osmosis—desalination using MgSO4 draw solution. Desalination 2011; 273(2-3): 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.050

Ding W, Li Y, Bao M, Zhang J, Zhang C, Lu J. Highly permeable and stable forward osmosis (FO) membrane based on the incorporation of Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles into both substrate and polyamide active layer. RSC Advances 2017; 7(64): 40311-40320. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA04046F

Ahmed DF, Isawi H, Badway NA, Elbayaa A, Shawky H. Highly porous cellulosic nanocomposite membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis desalination. Iranian Polymer Journal 2020; under review.

Hezma A, Rajeh A, Mannaa MA. An insight into the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the structural, thermal, mechanical properties and antimicrobial activity of Cs/PVA composite. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2019; 581: 123821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123821

Rajeh A, Ragab H, Abutalib M. Co-doped ZnO reinforced PEMA/PMMA composite: Structural, thermal, dielectric and electrical properties‏ for electrochemical applications. Journal of Molecular Structure 2020; 128447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128447

Hezma A, Elashmawi I, Abdelrazek E, Rajeh A, Kamal M. Enhancement of the thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane/polyvinyl chloride blend by loading single-walled carbon nanotubes. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 2017; 27(3): 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.06.001

Abutalib M, Rajeh A. Influence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the optical, magnetic and electrical properties of PMMA/PEO composites: Combined FT-IR/DFT for electrochemical applications. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 2020; 121348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2020.121348

Abutalib MM, Rajeh A. Influence of MWCNTs/Li-doped TiO2 nanoparticles on the structural, thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of poly (ethylene oxide)/poly (methylmethacrylate) composite. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 2020; 121309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2020.121309

Ragab H, Rajeh A. Structural, thermal, optical and conductive properties of PAM/PVA polymer composite doped with Ag nanoparticles for electrochemical application. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2020; 31(19): 16780-16792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04233-6

Abu Talib M, Rajeh A. Structural, thermal, optical and conductivity studies of Co/ZnO nanoparticles doped CMC polymer for solid-state battery applications. Polymer Testing 2020; 91: 106803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106803

Zirehpour A, Rahimpour A, Seyedpour F, Jahanshahi M. Developing new CTA/CA-based membrane containing hydrophilic nanoparticles to enhance the forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2015; 371: 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.026

Ong RC, Chung T-S, Helmer BJ, de Wit JS. Novel cellulose esters for forward osmosis membranes. Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2012; 51(49): 16135-16145. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302654h

Sahebi S, Sheikhi M, Ramavandi B, Ahmadi M, Zhao S, Adeleye AS, Shabani Z, Mohammadi T. Sustainable management of saline oily wastewater via forward osmosis using aquaporin membrane. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2020; 138: 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.013

Suwaileh W, Johnson D, Jones D, Hilal N. An integrated fertilizer driven forward osmosis-renewables powered membrane distillation system for brackish water desalination: A combined experimental and theoretical approach. Desalination 2019; 471: 114126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114126

Blandin G, Verliefde AR, Tang CY, Childress AE, Le-Clech P. Validation of assisted forward osmosis (AFO) process: Impact of hydraulic pressure. Journal of membrane science 2013; 447: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.002

Van Gestel T, Vandecasteele C, Buekenhoudt A, Dotremont C, Luyten J, Leysen R, Van der Bruggen B, Maes G. Salt retention in nanofiltration with multilayer ceramic TiO2 membranes. Journal of membrane science 2002; 209(2): 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00311-3

Coday BD, Heil DM, Xu P, Cath TY. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. Environmental science & technology 2013; 47(5): 2386-2393. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304519p

Corzo B, de la Torre T, Sans C, Ferrero E, Malfeito JJ. Evaluation of draw solutions and commercially available forward osmosis membrane modules for wastewater reclamation at pilot scale. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017; 326: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.108

Xie M, Price WE, Nghiem LD. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: role of solution pH and membrane orientation. Separation and Purification Technology 2012; 93: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.030

McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. Journal of membrane science 2008; 318(1-2): 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.021

Zhang X, Li Q, Wang J, Li J, Zhao C, Hou D. Effects of feed solution pH and draw solution concentration on the performance of phenolic compounds removal in forward osmosis process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2017; 5(3): 2508-2514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.030

Phuntsho S, Hong S, Elimelech M, Shon HK. Osmotic equilibrium in the forward osmosis process: Modelling, experiments and implications for process performance. Journal of membrane science 2014; 453: 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.009

Mi B, Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of membrane science 2008; 320(1-2): 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.036

Liden T, Carlton Jr DD, Miyazaki S, Otoyo T, Schug KA. Forward osmosis remediation of high salinity Permian Basin produced water from unconventional oil and gas development. Science of The Total Environment 2019; 653: 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.325

Majeed T, Sahebi S, Lotfi F, Kim JE, Phuntsho S, Tijing LD, Shon HK. Fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis for irrigation of tomatoes. Desalination and water treatment 2015; 53(10): 2746-2759. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.931524

Published

2022-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles