Econometric Models for Forecasting Innovative Development of the Country

Authors

  • Viktor P. Nevezhin Department of Data Analysis, Decision Making and Financial Technologies, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Anastasia V. Zhiglyaeva Department of World Economy and World Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Valery V. Smirnov KPMG Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Natalya K. Muravitskaya Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.66

Keywords:

Econometric model, explanatory factors, explained factor, Global Innovation Index, innovative development, regression, forecasting.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop models to predict the level of innovative development of countries, as well as to identify the most significant factors influencing innovative development.

The scientific novelty consists in applying a systematic, integrated approach to the selection of statistically significant factors that are drivers of innovative development, with the subsequent construction of econometric models and their testing. When developing models, both resources (“input parametersâ€) and results (“output parametersâ€) were taken into account, which also allows evaluating the effectiveness of innovative development and developing scenario forecasts taking into account the existing possibilities and limitations, optimizing innovative development strategies.

The main methods of research and approaches were used: statistical summary and grouping of information, trend analysis, regression and correlation analysis, testing of statistical hypotheses, factor analysis. The procedure for detecting multicollinearity was performed using the VIF test (Variance Inflation Factor, incremental regression method). In determining the set of explanatory variables (the choice of "short" or "long" regression), the following criteria were used: Akaike criterion and Bayesian Schwarz information criterion. To estimate the parameters of econometric models, the Least Squares Method was used with a preliminary check of the fulfillment of all conditions of the Gauss-Markov theorem. In addition, various tests for checking the constructed models and their parameters for significance, adequacy were applied: Durbin-Watson test, Sved-Eisenhart series method and Breush-Godfrey test, Helvig agreement test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Goldfeld-Quandt test and Spearman's rank correlation test. To determine the influence of explanatory factors on the explained factor, the average elasticity coefficients were calculated on the basis of linear regression as the best model based on the results of all tests.

Data and Empirical Analysis: The main components included in the calculation of the Global Innovation Index (GII) were selected for the study. Statistical data on them are published annually, which allows us to estimate the country's place in international innovation development. The study identified four multiple econometric models: one linear and three non-linear. The value of the Global Innovation Index was chosen as an explained factor, and the indicators for the main groups in accordance with the GII structure were chosen as explanatory factors.

To achieve this goal, the following work was carried out, as reflected in this article: 1) an econometric analysis was performed based on a sample of 30 countries based on the 2018 Global Innovation Index report; 2) multiple regression models were built - linear, polynomial, hyperbolic and power; 3) with the use of special tests, a check for heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation of random residues was implemented; 4) the parameters and the obtained regressions were estimated for statistical significance and adequacy.

According to the results of the study, the model that best approximates the initial data was chosen. Using this regression, one can form scenario forecasts of the country's innovative development, for example, by predicting the values of individual factors using various modern methods of macroeconomic planning and forecasting. The principle is the expediency of the most optimal combination of resources for innovative development in order to ensure the maximum effect on the "output".

References

Ando Tomohiro, Sueishi Naoya. (2019). On the Convergence Rate of the SCAD-Penalized Empirical Likelihood Estimator. Econometrics, 7(1), 15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7010015
Barnett W.A., Diewert W.E., Maasoumi E. (2016). Innovations in Measurement in Economics and Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, Volume 191, Issue 2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.015
Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva, 386 p.
Dougherty, ?. (2011). Introduction to Econometrics. (4th ed.) Oxford University Press, 573 p.
Drucker, P. (1993). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. Collins, 293 p.
Georg Licht, Konrad Zoz. (2000). Patents and R&D An Econometric Investigation Using Applications for German, European and US Patents by German Companies. The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, pp. 307-338.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_12
Kotsemir, ?. (2011). Long-term forecasting of S&T and innovation indicators. International Workshop “Science and Technology Foresight”, pp. 2-15.
Kozicina, A.N., Filimonenko, I.V. (2015). Strategic interconnection of innovation development and management of human potential of the region. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 1 (37), pp. 167-179. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2015.1.37.11
Mukhina, T.N, Minaichenkova, E.I., Filatov V.V. (2014). Scientific journal NRU ITMO, 3, pp. 346-358. (In Russ.).
Nevezhin, V.P. (2017). Prakticheskaya ekonometrika v kejsah: ucheb. posobie / V.P. Nevezhin, Yu.V. Nevezhin. ID «FORUM»: INFRA-M, 317 p. (In Russ.).
Novikov, A.G. (2017). Foreign experience of the innovation infrastructure of the region. Business strategies: analysis, forecast, management, 9 (41), pp. 31-43. (In Russ.).
Rejmer, V. (2013). Innovation system of Russia: management problems and prospects. International Agricultural Journal, 2, pp. 3-6. (In Russ.).
Rejting innovacionnogo razvitiya sub""ektov Rossijskoj Federacii. Vypusk 5 / G.I. Abdrahmanova, P.D. Bahtin, L.M. Gohberg i dr.; pod red. L.M. Gohberga; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki». HSE, 2017, 260 p. (In Russ.).
Shlyakhto, I.V. (2007). Assessment of innovative potential of the region. Management of social and economic systems, 1, pp. 5-16.
Yurynets, Z. (2016). Forecasting model and assessment of the innovative and scientific-technical policy of Ukraine in the sphere of innovative economy formation. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2), pp.16-23.
https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2).2016.02
Zhiglyaeva, A.V. (2018). Innovative potential of the Russian Federation: the role in ensuring economic security. Skif. Questions of student science, 4 (20), pp. 38-41. (In Russ.).
Zueva, O.A. (2016). Methodological approaches to the study of the essence and measurement of innovative potential. Scientific journal NRU ITMO, 3, pp. 20-31. (In Russ).

Downloads

Published

2019-10-02

How to Cite

Nevezhin, V. P., Zhiglyaeva, A. V., Smirnov, V. V., & Muravitskaya, N. K. (2019). Econometric Models for Forecasting Innovative Development of the Country. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 767–775. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.66

Issue

Section

Articles