The Impact of Gasfier Stoves Use on Socio-Economic and Environment in Tanzania: The Case of Arusha and Moshi Municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2013.02.04.3Keywords:
Gasfier stoves, economic and environmental benefits, Tanzania, Sub-Saharan AfricaAbstract
This study examined the socio-economic and environmental impact of the adoption of gasfier stoves by households in Arusha and Moshi towns in Tanzania. A total of 55 respondents were selected purposely from the gasfier stoves. For comparative purposes another 55 charcoal users were selected randomly for interview making a total sample of 110. There were also focus group consultations and key informant interviews. Structured and semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect data, which were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences.
The results show that the respondents who were using gasfier stoves had significant reduction (p=0.001) in the cost of energy for cooking compared to charcoal stove users by spending only T.shs 13,396 per month compared to T.shs 36,932 for charcoal users. The use of gasfier stoves also had a positive impact on the environment. Findings show that by using gasfier stoves 15.4 ha were saved from deforestation per annum and about 365.4.tonnes of carbon were saved for sequestration an act that reduces carbon emissions and global warming.
Nevertheless, despite the impressive performance of gasfier stoves for cooking, the rate of adoption has remained low. The main reason for this was reported to be the high price, poor quality of the pellets and unfriendly usability. The adoption of gasfier stoves could only be enhanced by addressing these constraining factors.
References
Bhattacharya SC, Salam AP. Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries. Biomass Bioenergy 2002; 22(4): 305-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00008-9
Sulaiman SA, Romli R. Combustion Performance of Various Cellulosic Biomasses in a gasfier Cooking stove. In: 4th International Meeting on Advances in Thermofluids (IMAT) 2011 Melaka. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/6549/. Accessed on 24th January 2013.
Ezzati M, Kammen DM. Quantifying the effects of exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion on acute respiratory infections in developing countries. Environm Health Persp 2001; 109(5): 481-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109481
Bhanap IJ, Deshmukh R. Development of an improved sawdust gasifier stove for industrial applications. J Renewable Sustainable Energy 2012; 4: 16 pages.
Haines AF, Smith KR Anderson D, Epstein PR, McMichael AJ, Roberts I, et al. Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change. Lancet 2007; 370(9594): 1264-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61257-4
Bailis R1, Ezzati M, Kammen DM. Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Biomass and Petroleum Energy Futures in Africa. Science 2005; 308(5718): 98-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1106881
Kammen DM, Kirubi C. Poverty, Energy, and Resource Use in Developing Countries. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Focus on Africa, Reducing the Impact of Poverty on Health and Human Development: Scientific Approaches 2008; 1136: 348-57.
Schulte-Bisping H, Bredemeier, M, Beese FO. Global availability of wood and energy supply from fuelwood and charcoal. Ambio 1999; 28(7): 592-94.
Monela GC, O'Kting'ati A, Kiwele PM. Socio-economic aspects of charcoal consumption and environmental consequences along the Dar es Salaam-Morogoro highway, Tanzania. Forest Ecology Management 1993; 58(3-4): 249-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90148-G
Hofstad O. Woodland Deforestation by Charcoal Supply to Dar es Salaam. J Environm Econom Manag 1997; 33(1): 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0975
Hosier RH, Kipondya W. Urban household energy use in Tanzania: Prices, substitutes and poverty. Urban Energy Environ Africa 1993; 21(5): 454-73.
Casillas CE, Kammen DM Biomass energy: Lessons from case studies in developing countries. Environment and Development. Policy Forum. Science 2010; 330(6008): 1181-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1197412
Barton JH, Osborbe GE Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28398 Accessed on 14th March 2013.
Kishore VVN, Bhandari PM, Gupta P. Biomass energy technologies for rural infrastructure and village power—opportunities and challenges in the context of global climate change concerns. Energy Policy 2004; 32 (6): 801-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00002-8
Mukunda HS, Dasappa S, Paul PJ, Rajan NKS, Mahesh Y, Kumar RD, Mukund D. Gasfier stoves – science, technology and field outreach. Curr Sci 2010; 98(5): 627-38.
Panwar N. Design and performance evaluation of energy-efficient biomass gasfier cooking stoves with multi fuels. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 2009; 14(7): 627-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9187-4
Varunkumar S, Rajan NKS, Mukunda HS. Experimental and computational studies on a gasfier stove. Energy Conver Manag 2012: 53(1): 135-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.08.022
Balat M and Ayar G. Biomass Energy in the World, Use of Biomass and Potential Trends. Energy Sources 2005; 27(10): 931-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00908310490449045
McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bio-Resour Technol 2002; 83(1): 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3
Hall DO, Rosillo-Calle F, de Groot P. Biomass energy: Lessons from case studies in developing countries. Energy Policy 1992; 20(1): 62-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(92)90148-U
Ravindranath NH, Balachandra P. Sustainable bio-energy for India: Technical, economic and policy analysis. Energy 2009; 34(8): 1003-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.12.012
Masinia A, Menichetti E. The impact of behavioural factors on the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Energy Policy 2012; 40: 28-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.062
Mwakaje AG. Dairy farming and biogas use in Rungwe district,South-west Tanzania: A study of opportunities and constraints. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2008: 2240-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.013
Kemp R, Volpi M. The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. J Cleaner Produc 2001; S14-S21.
Awerbuch S. Portfolio-Based Electricity Generation Planning: Policy Implications For Renewable Energy Security. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2006; 11(3): 693-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-4754-4
González P. Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy Environ 2005; 14(1): 20-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.426
Anderson ST, Newell RG. Information programs for technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource Energy Econom 2004; 26(1): 27-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.07.001
Montalvo C. Cleaner technology diffusion: case studies, modelling and policy. J Cleaner Produc 2008b; 16(1): (Suppl 1): S1-S6.
Montalvo C. General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: a survey 1990–2007. J Cleaner Produc 2008a; 16(1): (Suppl 1): S7-S13.
CASEC. Community Aid and Small Enterprises Consultancy (CASEC). Arusha district council. District energy guideline 2010. Unpublished.
URT. United Republic of Tanzania. National Population and Housing Census 2002: Mkuki Publishers, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Paul R. Environmental and social impact statement for the proposed upgrading of 1.73 km NMC – PPF road in Arusha municipality under the proposed Tanzania strategic cities project 2011. Draft report. M/s UWP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, P. O. Box 1857, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, 3200, South Africa in association with UWP Consulting (T) Ltd, P.O. Box 8151, Dar Es Salaam. Tel. +255 22 2780341; Fax +255 22 2780362; email info@uwp.co.tz
URT (2007). Moshi Town. (http://www.tanzaniavolunteers. com/staying-and-living/freetime/moshi-town/
URT. United Republic of Tanzania. Moshi Socio-Economic Profile 2012: Unpublished.
Van Asperen S.A. Research Project: Improvement of production and management processes of Metal-Ceramic Charcoal Stoves in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 2001.
Bengwayan MA. How To Calculate CO2 in Trees 2010 http://michaelbengwayan.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/how-to-calculate-co2-in-trees/. Accessed on 14th March 2013.
Giné X, Klonner S. Credit Constraints as a Barrier to Technology Adoption by the Poor: Lessons from South-Indian Small-Scale Fishery 2005, World Bank and Cornell University.
Jones DW. Some Simple Economics of Improved Cookstove Programs in Developing Countries. Resour Energy 1989; 10: 24764.
Ruiz-Mercado I, Masera O, Zamorac H, Smith KR. Adoption and sustained use of improved cooking stoves. Energy Policy 2011; 39 (12): 7557–7566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.028
Pachauri S, Jiang L. The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy 2008; 36(11): 4022-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
