Comprehensive Evaluation of Biomass Energy Technologies in China

Authors

  • Qing Yang State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Fei Han State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Xudong Wu State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Deyuan Wang State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Xianhua Wang State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Haiping Yang State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Shihong Zhang State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China
  • Hanping Chen State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2014.03.03.1

Keywords:

Biomass energy technologies, analytic hierarchy process, comprehensive evaluation, development, China.

Abstract

Based on a comprehensive review of the different biomass energy technologies in China, a hybrid evaluation model founding on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed to offer a comprehensive evaluation of a variety of biomass energy technologies in China. In this model, three evaluation criteria, including the applicability of technology, economic viability and environment-friendly, are defined and nine indicators, including resources supply, equipment and technology, energy efficiency, energy grade, production cost, economic benefit, ecological impact, environmental pollution and social benefit, are devised. Priorities are established in this study based on pairwise comparisons of the elements. In addition, the model has been validated by various utilization technologies reported in literatures. Results show that environmental pollution, social benefit, ecological impact and resources supply greatly impact on the application of biomass technologies, followed by economic benefit. Besides, it is demonstrated that integrated technologies of biomass energy, which is closely related with residential daily life and compatible with local ecological environment, possess evident superiority. Furthermore, the outcome can be supportive for guiding future development of biomass energy in China.

References

Wu CZ, Ma LL. Modern utilization technologies of biomass energy. Beijing: Chemical Industrial Publisher 2003.

Zhang Y, Zhou SP, Su F. Fuzzy mathematical method and its application. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House, 1992.

Chen GQ, Zhang B. Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: Inventory and input–output analysis. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 6180-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.004

Murphy JD, Power N. A technical, economic, and environmental analysis of energy production from newspaper in Ireland. Waste Manage 2007; 27: 177-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.003

Faaij APC. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy 2006; 34: 322-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.03.026

Berglund M, Börjesson P. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bio-energy 2006; 30: 254-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.011

Robinson A, Rhodes J, Keith D. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 5081-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es034367q

Caputo AC, Palumbo M, Pelagagge PM, Scacchia F. Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass Bio-energy 2005; 28: 35-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.04.009

Ju L, Chen B. Embodied energy and emergy evaluation of a typical biodiesel production chain in China. Ecol Model 2011; 222: 2385-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.021

Saft RJ. Life cycle assessment of a pyrolysis/gasification plant for hazardous paint waste. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2007; 12: 230-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-007-0332-6

Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification - A life cycle assessment approach. Chem Eng Process 2008; 47: 1267-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.04.003

Luterbacher JS, Froling M,Vogel F, Maréchal F, Tester JW. Hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: process design and life cycle asessment. Environ Sci Technol 2009; 43: 1578-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801532f

Puy N, Rieradevall J, Bartroll J. Environmental assessment of post-consumer wood and forest residues gasification: The case study of Barcelona metropolitan area. Biomass Bio-energy 2010; 34: 1457-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.009

Yang Q, Chen B, Ji X, He YF, Chen GQ. Exergetic evaluation of corn-ethanol production in China. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2009; 14: 2450-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.08.011

Ou X, Zhang X, Chang S, Guo Q. Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six bio-fuel pathways by LCA in (the) People's Republic of China. Appl Energy 2009; 86: S197-208.

Maraver D, Rezeau A, Sebastian F, et al. In Thermodynamic optimization of a tri-generation system based on biomass combustion, 17th European Biomass Conference, Hamburg, 2009; pp. 1368-76.

Sebastian F, Royo J, Gomez M. Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology. Energy 2011; 36: 2029-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.003

Basu P. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Academic press 2010.

Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin & New York: Springer-Verlag 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Saaty TL, Peniwati K. Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences 2013.

Zhang Y, Zhou S, Shu F. Fuzzy mathematics method and its application[M]. Beijing: Coal Industry Press 1992.

Xiao B, Zhou YB, Li JF. Circular economy technologies of biomass energy. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press 2006.

Lei ZM. Technical and economic synthetic evaluation. Beijing: China Standards Press 2004.

Warnecke R. Gasification of biomass: comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Bio-energy 2000; 18: 489-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00009-X

Wu CZ, Ma LL. Current status of biomass gasification power generation technologies in China. Sci Technol Industry China 2006; 2006: 76-9.

Zhu XF, Zheng JL. Development of biomass pyrolysis device and its experimental research. Eng Sci 2006; 8: 89-93.

Chen BM, Chen AN, Zhang ZF, Du HL. Analysis on the driving and constraint factors of crop straw gasification and commercialization development. J Nat Resour 2007; 22: 62-8.

Chen WP, Chen YW, Liu ZF. The application and development of the biomass gasification industrial process technology. J Henan University (Nat Sci) 2007; 37: 35-41.

Chen YS,Cao GQ, Zhang ZY, Zhu DW. Technical and economic evaluation for village-level straw Gasification System for central gas supply. Agri Dev Equip 2007; 6: 11-5.

Liu SC, Jiang JC. Conversion technology and utilization of biomass energy(II)-technology and equipment of biomass shaped fuel production. Biomass Chem Eng 2007; 41: 59-63.

EFYP, Twelfth Five-Year Planning. In China, N. D. a. R. C. o., Ed. Beijing 2011.

Sun C, Liang W. Status of bio-diesel development and production in China. Sino-Global Energy 2008; 13: 23-8.

Yin FS, Zheng YK. Status of bio-diesel industry in China. Detergent Cosmetics 2008; 31: 1-3.

Liu F, Yan Z, Zhang L. The current situation and countermeasures proposals of rural biogas in Dalian. Mod Agric Sci 2008; 1: 19.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-29

How to Cite

Yang, Q., Han, F., Wu, X., Wang, D., Wang, X., Yang, H., Zhang, S., & Chen, H. (2014). Comprehensive Evaluation of Biomass Energy Technologies in China. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 3(3), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2014.03.03.1

Issue

Section

Articles