Effect of Calving Interval on Milk Yield in Italian Buffalo Population

E. Parlato; L. Zicarelli

doi:10.6000/1927-520X.2016.05.01.3

Authors

E. Parlato M’ama Buffalo Welfare Science and Technology, via G. Alviani, 31 Capua, ITA, Italy
L. Zicarelli Animal Production Department, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Naples Federico II, ITA, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2016.05.01.3

Keywords:

Italian Mediterranean Buffalo, milk yield, calving interval

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the previous calving intervals (CI) on milk yield (MY) in the current lactation for the Italian buffalo breed population.

Data for 86,585 lactation records from the Italian Buffalo Breeders Association database, were analyzed. MY BLUP-estimates were obtained by including in the Animal Model the fixed effects of age-parity, previous CI, and herd-contemporary-group. The MY solutions for the months of CI were analyzed with the linear regression model where CI in months was the explanatory variable. 59.66% of the lactation records had CI between 11 and 14 months. 37.91 % of the lactation records were distributed between 15 and 24 months. The smaller percentage of records showed CI greater than 24 months. This CI distribution may be, in part, the result of herd management strategies. Dairy producers try to shorten the CI of their herd in order to get the most profit from early conceptions of the buffalo. The regression model and its parameters were statistically significant. The coefficient of determination was equal to 0.58. The intercept was equal to 72.42 kg; and the linear coefficient (b) was equal to -3.43. The negative value of b denotes a negative effect of CI on MY. This result indicates that there is a negative linear relationship between previous CI and MY in the current lactation. Therefore, shorten the CI may increase the profits of the farm through higher MY, because it has less of a negative effect on MY than longer CI.

References

Gwazdauskas FC, Wilcox CJ, Thatcher WW. Environmental and managemental factors affecting conception rate in a subtropical climate. J Dairy Sci 1975; 58: 88-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84523-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84523-1

Marques JR, Ramos AA, Silva MET, Costa NL. Syed, M.; Zafarullah, Khan; shah, M. A. P. 1996; 4131.

Shrivastava AK, Singh CSP, Verma SK, Dutta OP. Dry period and calving interval in buffaloes maintained under farmers’ management conditions. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University 1996; 8: 193-195.

Nieuwhof GJ, Powell RL, Norman HD. Ages at calving and calving interval for dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 685-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79160-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79160-8

Syed M, Zafarullah, Khan, Shah, MAP. Production performance, persistency of lactation and repeatability of some quantitative traits in Nili- Ravi buffaloes. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 1996; 12: 1-9.

Marion GB, Gier HT. Factors affecting bovine ovarian activity after parturition. J Anim Sci 1968; 27: 1621-1626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2761621x

Morrow DA. Postpartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in dairy cattle. Vet Scope 1969; 14: 2.

Gwazdauskas FC, Thatcher WW, Wilcox CJ. Physiological, environmental, and hormonal factors at insemination which may affect conception. J Dairy Sci 1973; 56: 873-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85270-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85270-1

Everett RW, Armstrong DV, Boyd LJ. Genetic relationship between production and breeding efficiency. J Dairy Sci 1966; 49: 879-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)87963-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)87963-8

Smith JW, Legates JE. Relation of days open and days dry to lactation milk and fat yields. J Dairy Sci 1962; 45: 1192-1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(62)89595-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(62)89595-2

Touchberry RW, Rottensten K, Andersen H. Associations between service interval, interval from first service to conception, number of services per conception, and level of butterfat production. J Dairy Sci 1959; 42: 1157-1170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(59)90708-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(59)90708-8

Qureshi MS, Ahmad N. Interaction among calf suckling, use of oxytocin, milk production and reproduction in dairy buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 106: 380-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.05.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.05.019

Batra SK, Pandey RS. Relative concentration of 13-14-dihydro-15 keto prostaglandin F2a in blood and milk of buffaloes during the estrus cycle and early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 1983; 67: 191-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0670191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0670191

Perera BM, A. O., Mohan V, Kurovita VY, Abeygunawardena H. Effect of suckling and nutritional supplementation on postpartum ovarian activity and LH profiles in indigenous buffaloes of Sri Lanka. In: Proc. 12th Int. Cong. Animal Reprod. Artif. Insem, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 2081-2083.

Qureshi MS, Samad HA, Habib G, Usmani RH, Siddiqui MM. Study on factors leading to seasonality of reproduction in dairy buffaloes. I. Nutritional factors. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 1999a; 12(7): 1019-1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.1019

Qureshi MS, Habib G, Samad HA, Lodhi LA, Usmani RH. Study on factors leading to seasonality of reproduction in dairy buffaloes. II. Non-nutritional factors. Asian-Aust. J Anim Sci 1999b; 12(7): 1025-1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.1025

Zicarelli L, Di Palo R, Neglia G, Ariota B, Varricchio E, Campanile G. Estimation of the intercalving period in Italian Mediterranean buffalo. Proceedings VIII World Buffalo Congress, Caserta, Italy, October 19-22,2007. In: Italian Journal of Animal Science 2007; 6(Suppl. 2 - Part 1): 709-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.709

Holmann FJ, Shumway CR, Blake RW, Schwart RB, Sudweeks EM. Economic value of days open for Holstein cows of alternative milk yields with varying calving intervals. J Dairy Sci 1984; 67: 36-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81349-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81349-1

Maijala K. Fertility as a breeding problem in artificially bred populations of dairy cattle. I. Registration and heritability of female sterility. Ann Agr Fenn Suppl 1964; 1-3: 1-94.

Pelissier CL. Herd breeding problems and their consequences. J Dairy Sci 1972; 55: 385-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85502-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85502-4

Distl O, Wurm A, Glibotic A, Brem G, Krausslich H. Analysis of relationships between veterinary recorded production diseases and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 1989; 23: 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90006-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90006-7

Swedish Dairy Association. Cattle statistics. Svensk Mjölk, 631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden 2002.

Bar-Anan R, Soller M. The effects of days-open on milk yield and on breeding policy post partum. Animal Production 1979; 29: 109-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100012204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100012204

Gaines WL, Palfrey JR. Length of calving interval and average milk yield. J Dairy Sci 1931; 14: 294-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(31)93474-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(31)93474-7

Gonza´lez-Recio O, Pe´rez-Cabal MA, Alenda R. Economic value of female fertility and its relationship with profit in Spanish dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 3053-3061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73438-4

Wall E, Brotherstone S, Woolliams JA, Banos G, Coffey MP. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct and correlated traits. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 4093-4102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74023-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74023-5

Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Van Vleck LD, Van Tassell CP, Kachman SD. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances. Agric. Res. Serv., USDA, Washington, DC 1995.

SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1. 2005. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.