The Effect of Perceived Deterrence on Compliance with Authorities: The Moderating Influence of Procedural Justice

Authors

  • Peter Verboon Open University of the Netherlands, The Netherlands
  • Marius van Dijke Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15

Keywords:

Deterrence, sanction severity, detection probability, procedural justice, compliance

Abstract

In order to stimulate compliance, authorities often use deterrence instruments. However, scientific literature from the fields of criminology, sociology and psychology has not been consistent in when or why deterrence is effective in shaping compliance.

In the present study we investigated the role of procedural justice in relation to deterrence. Procedural justice has strong effects on people’s attitudes and behaviour regarding the social collective, including compliance with authorities. We argued that particularly authorities who are considered procedurally fair are successful in stimulating compliance with the use of deterrence instruments. In support of these ideas, a field survey in which we focused on sanction severity as the first element of deterrence and an experiment in which we focused on detection probability as the second element of deterrence revealed that procedural justice and deterrence instruments interactively strengthen each other’s effect in promoting compliance. These finding may partly explain the sometimes-contradictory results from prior work about the effectiveness of deterrence by supporting a justice perspective on the effectiveness of deterrence in increasing compliance with authorities.

References

Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.

Allingham, Michael G. and Agnar Sandmo. 1972. "Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis." Journal of Public Economics 1: 323-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Becker, Gary S. 1968. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach." Journal of Political Economy 76: 169-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Braithwaite, Valerie. 2003. "Dancing with Tax Authorities: Motivational Postures and Non-Compliant Actions." Pp. 15–39 in Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion, edited by V. Braithwaite. Ashgate: Hants, UK.

Carroll, John S. 1987. "Compliance with the Law: a Decision-Making Approach to Taxpaying." Law and Human Behavior 11: 319-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01044744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044744

Colquitt, Jason A. 2001. "On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure." Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 386-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Cullis, John G. and Alan Lewis. 1997. "Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention." Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 305-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00010-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00010-X

Darley, John M. and Thane S. Pittman. 2003. "The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice." Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 324-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05

De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Ellen Giebels, and Evert Van de Vliert. 1998. "Social Motives and Trust in Integrative Negotiation: The Disruptive Effects of Punitive Capability." Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 408-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.408

Depoorter, Ben and Sven Vanneste. 2005. "Norms and Enforcement: The Case against Copyright Litigation." Oregon Law review 84: 1127-1179.

Dipboye, Robert L. 1990. "Laboratory vs. Field Research in Industrial and Organizational Psychology." International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5: 1–34.

Eisenberger, Robert, Norman Cotterell, and Joan Marvel. 1987. "Reciprocation ideology." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 743-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.743

Elffers, Henk 2000. "But Taxpayers Do Cooperate!" Pp. 84-194 in Cooperation in Modern Society. Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States and Organizations, edited by M. van Vught, M. Snyder, T. R. Tyler, and A. Biel. London: Routledge.

Evans, Martin G. 1985. "A Monte Carlo Study of The Effects of Correlated Method Variance in Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis." Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 36: 305-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0

Fehr, Ernst and Bettina Rockenbach. 2003. "Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism." Nature 422: 137-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01474

Fischer, Carol M., Martha L. Wartick, and Mike M. Mark. 1992. "Detection Probability and Taxpayer Compliance: A Review Of The Literature." Journal of Accounting Literature 11: 1-46.

Frey, Bruno, S. 2003. "The Role of Deterrence and Tax Morale in Taxation in the European Union." in Jelle Zijlstra Lecture 2002. Wassenaar: NIAS.

Gau, Jacinta M., Nicholas Corsaro, Eric A. Stewart, and Rod K. Brunson. 2012. "Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy." Journal of Criminal Justice 40: 333-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.05.002

Gneezy, Uri and Aldo Rustichini. 2000. "A Fine Is a Price'." Journal of Legal Studies 29: 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/468061

Grasmick, Harold G. and Robert J. Jr Bursik. 1990. "Conscience, Signficant Other, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model." Law and Society Review 24: 837-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053861

Hessing, Dick J., Henk Elffers, and Russell H. Weigel. 1988. "Exploring the limits of self-reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 405-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.405

Hite, Peggy A. 1988. "An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self-reported taxpayer noncompliance." Journal of Economic Psychology 9: 445-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(88)90013-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(88)90013-X

Kirchler, Erich. 2007. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238

Kirchler, Erich, Erik Hoelzl, and Ingrid Wahl. 2008. "Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The 'slippery slope' framework." Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 210-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Klepper, Steven and Daniel Nagin. 1989. "Tax Compliance and Perceptions of the Risks of Detention and Criminal Prosecution." Law and Society Review 23: 209-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053715

Leventhal, Gerald, S. 1980. "What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships." Pp. 27-55 in Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research edited by K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, and R. Willis. New York: Plenum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2

Lind, Edgar A. and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

McClelland, Gary H. and Charles M. Judd. 1993. "Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects." Psychological Bulletin 114: 376-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376

Mulder, Laetitia B. 2009. "The Two-fold Influence of Sanctions on Moral Norms." Pp. 169-180 in Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making, edited by D. De Cremer. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Mulder, Laetitia B., Eric van Dijk, David De Cremer, and Henk A. M. Wilke. 2006. "Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 147-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.002

Mulder, Laetitia B., Peter Verboon, and David De Cremer. 2009. "Sanctions and moral judgments: The moderating effect of sanction severity and trust in authorities." European Journal of Social Psychology 39: 255-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.506

Murphy, Kristina. 2004. "The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: a Study of Accused Tax Avoiders." Law and Human Behavior 28: 187-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca

Murphy, Kristina, Tom R. Tyler, and Amy Curtis. 2009 "Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective when People Question the Legitimacy of the Law?" Regulation and Governance 3: 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x

Nagin, Daniel, S. 1998. "Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century." Pp. 1-42 in Crime and Justice vol. 23, edited by M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449268

Nagin, Daniel S. and Raymond Paternoster. 1993. "Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime." Law and Society Review 27: 467-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3054102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102

Paternoster, Raymond. 1987. "The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: a review of the evidence and issues." Justice Quarterly 4: 173-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418828700089271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828700089271

Paternoster, Raymond, Ronet Bachman, Robert Brame, and Lawrence W. Sherman. 1997. "Do Fair Procedures Matter - The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault." Law and Society Review 31: 163–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3054098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3054098

Piquero, Alex, R. and Stephen G. Tibbetts. 1996. "Specifying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Low Self-Control and Situational Factors in Offenders’ Decision-Making: Toward a More Complete Model of Rational Offending." Justice Quarterly 13: 481-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093061

Piquero, Alex R., Zenta Gomez-Smith, and Lynn Langton. 2004. "Discerning unfairness where others may not: low self-control and unfair sanction perceptions." Criminology 42: 699-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00534.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00534.x

Shapiro, Debra L. and Jeanne M. Brett. 2005. "What Is the Role of Control in Organizational Justice?" Pp. 155-178 in Handbook of Organizational Justice edited by J. Greenberg and J. A. Colquitt. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Sherman, Lawrence W. 1993. "Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction." Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 445-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030004006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030004006

Sunshine, Jason and Tom R. Tyler. 2003. "The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing." Law and Society Review 37: 513-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002

Tenbrunsel, Ann E. and David M. Messick. 1999. "Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation." Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 684-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667052

Thibaut, John, W. and Laurens Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tyler, Tom R. 2006. "Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation." Annual Review of Psychology 57: 375-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038

Tyler, Tom R. and Steven L. Blader. 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Tyler, Tom R., Peter Degoey, and Heather Smith. 1996. "Understanding Why the Justice of Group Procedures Matters: A Test of the Psychological Dynamics of the Group Value Model." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 913-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913

Tyler, Tom R. and Yuen J. Huo. 2002. Trust in The Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. NY: Russell-Sage Foundation.

van Dijke, Marius and Peter Verboon. 2010. "Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance." Journal of Economic Psychology 31: 80-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005

van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, Marcello Gallucci, and Gaby Toeset. 2008. "Procedural justice in punishment systems: Inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation." British Journal of Social Psychology 47: 311-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466607X218212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X218212

Varma, Kimberly N. and Anthony N. Doob. 1998. "Deterring Economic Crimes: The Case of Tax Evasion." Canadian Journal of Criminology 40: 165-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.40.2.165

Verboon, Peter and Marius van Dijke. 2007. "A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability." Journal of Economic Psychology 28: 704-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004

Verboon, Peter and Marius van Dijke. 2011. "When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness." Journal of Economic Psychology 32: 120-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007

Wenzel, Michael. 2002. "The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers' Identity." Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 629-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.629

Wenzel, Michael. 2004a. "An Analysis of Norm Processes in Tax Compliance." Journal of Economic Psychology 25: 213-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00168-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00168-X

Wenzel, Michael. 2004b. "The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence." Law and Human Behavior 28: 547-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000046433.57588.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000046433.57588.71

Williams, Kirk R. and Richard Hawkins. 1986. " Perceptual Research on General Deterrence: A Critical Review." Law and Society Review 20: 545-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053466

Wit, Arjaan and Henk A. M. Wilke. 1990. "The Presentation of Rewards and Punishments in a Simulated Social Dilemma." Social Behaviour 5: 231-245.

Yamagishi, Toshio. 1986. "The Provision of a Sanctioning System as a Public Good." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 110-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110

Downloads

Published

2012-09-19

How to Cite

Verboon, P., & Dijke, M. van. (2012). The Effect of Perceived Deterrence on Compliance with Authorities: The Moderating Influence of Procedural Justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15

Issue

Section

Articles