Intellectual Disability Assessment: Anomalous Picture Concepts Scores in WISC-IV

Authors

  • Michael G. King Sunshine Health and Dental, 429 Ballarat Rd, Sunshine, 3020, Victoria, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2013.01.01.1

Keywords:

WISC-IV, Picture Concepts, Intellectual Disability, Criticism, Sub-test Anomaly, Cohort IQ profile, Perceptual Reasoning, Autism

Abstract

Attention is drawn to a putative WISC anomaly, specific to the case of Intellectual Disability (ID) IQ assessment. With ID, at best the WISC-IV Picture Concepts (PCn) is not a consistent part of the underlying “ability” represented by Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) factor, while at worst the PCn score may be “wrong”. This worst case situation is marked by a “very high PCn score” in an otherwise low profile and this outcome awaits a better interpretation which would be meaningful to the target child with Intellectual Disability. The literature relating to PCn scores in cases of “intellectually different” cohorts shows conflicting published evidence that the sub-test may be either generally lower than the cohort average, or generally above that average, for example in cases of Autism. The present paper proposes that the broad explanation for the PCn anomaly is explained by deriving an answer to each item from a focus on single-feature solution rather than an integrative approach. Future research may clarify the frequency and the meaning of this issue, while the present paper raises a caution in the “standard” interpretation of intellectual disability IQ profiles.

References

Bergeron R, Floyd RG. Individual part score profiles of children with Intellectual Disability: A descriptive analysis across three intelligence tests. School Psychol Rev 2013; 42(1): 22-38.

Cohen A, Fiorello CA, Farley FH. The Cylindrical structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — IV: A retest of the Guttman model of intelligence. Intelligence 2006; 34: 587-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.05.003

Wechsler D. WISC-IV Technical and Interpretative manual. The Psychological Corporation. San Antonio 2003.

King MG. Est-ce que c’est vous-même dans la glace? - the Phenomenology of Rorschach Expressive Constraint. Bull Soc Sci Med 2008; (2): 295-305.

Mayes SD, Calhoun SL. WISC-IV and WIAT-II profiles in children with High-Functioning Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2008; 38: 428-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0410-4

Treisman A, Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychol 1980; 12: 97-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

Kent C, Howard CJ, Gilchrist ID. Distractors slow information accumulation in simple feature search. J Vision 2012; 12(1): ArtID 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/12.1.13

Downloads

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

King, M. G. (2013). Intellectual Disability Assessment: Anomalous Picture Concepts Scores in WISC-IV. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2013.01.01.1

Issue

Section

General Articles