Local Biomass Processing is Practical for Facilitating Fermentation to Bioethanol

Authors

  • John J. Savarese MobinolFuel Institute, 119 Hunt Club Dr., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2013.02.03.5

Keywords:

Biomass, alkali, cellulase, alkali-cellulase, pretreatment, bioethanol

Abstract

Local processing of biomass prior to fermentation at another site has advantages in transportation savings and in fermentation facility operation. To evaluate the feasibility of treating biomass locally to produce fermentation ready glucose an alkali-cellulase process was evaluated at laboratory scale using 5 g of three types of biomass. After pretreatment with an aqueous solution of NaOH (0.5% w/v, 20% w/w-biomass), T=100°C x 12 h, corn stover and wheat straw were shown to undergo cellulase hydrolysis to glucose; however, pine chips were not as susceptible. Commercially available cellulase was capable of producing glucose within three hours from corn stover and wheat straw. The NaOH pretreated biomass was mixed with enzymes in a small volume (50 mL) to conserve water. However, glucose inhibition of cellulase appeared to limit hydrolysis. Volume expansion by ten-fold dilution (500 mL) resulted in rapid release of glucose presumably by decreasing end product inhibition. Application at a commercial level will require increased water management. The resulting glucose solution could be concentrated by thermal or membrane technology for delivery to grain fermenting facilities to be used without further processing. Solids remaining after enzyme hydrolysis can be recycled locally to produce additional glucose. Scale-up of this alkali-cellulase process for local application appears feasible given the materials and conditions evaluated in this study. Local treatment of biomass using the alkali-cellulase process to produce glucose to be transported to existing grain fermenting facilities is a novel approach based on reliable technology and has been demonstrated at laboratory scale.

References

Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural waste: an overview. Renew Energy 2012; 37: 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045

Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science 1991; 251: 1318-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.251.4999.1318

Savarese JJ, Young SD. Combined enzyme hydrolysis of cellulose and yeast fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 1978; 20: 1291-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260200814

Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005; 16: 577-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009

Banerjee S, Mudliar S, Sen R, Giri B, Satpute D, Chakrabarti T, Pandey RA. Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 2010; 4: 77-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.188

Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenney KL. Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 2007; 1: 181-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.26

Richard TL. Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure Science 2010; 329: 793-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1189139

Digman MF, Shinners KJ, Muck RE, Dien BS. Full-scale on-farm pretreatment of perennial grasses with dilute acid for fuel ethanol production. Bioenerg Res 2010; 3: 335-41.

Williams SD, Shinners KJ. Farm-scale anaerobic storage and aerobic stability of high dry matter sorghum as a biomass feedstock. Biomass Bioenerg 2012; 46: 309-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.08.010

Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY. Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005; 96: 2026-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.018

Wyman CE, Balan V, Dale BE, Elander RT, Falls M, Hames B, et al. Comparative data on effects of leading pretreatments and enzyme loadings and formulations on sugar yields from different switchgrass sources. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102: 11052-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.069

Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J. A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour Technol 2007 98: 3000-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.022

Xu J, Cheng JJ, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Burns JC. Sodium hydroxide pretreatment of switchgrass for ethanol production. Energy Fuels 2010; 24: 2113-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef9014718

Xu J, Cheng JJ, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Burns JC. Lime pretreatment of switchgrass at mild temperatures for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101: 2900-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.015

McIntosh S, Vancov T. Optimisation of dilute alkaline pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw. Biomass Bioenerg 2011; 35: 3094-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.018

Zhu JY, Pan X, Zalesny RS. Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies, and recalcitrance. Appl Microbiol Bioteechnol 2010; 87: 847-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2654-8

Kumar R, Wyman CE. Effect of xylanase supplementation of cellulase on digestion of corn stover solids by leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 2009; 100: 4203-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.057

Taneda D, Ueno Y, Okino S. Characteristics of enzyme hydrolysis of cellulose under static condition. Bioresour Technol 2012; 121: 154-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.104

Gusakov AV, Kondratyeva EG, Sinitsyn AP. Comparison of two methods for assessing reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities. Int J Anal Chem 2011; 2011: 1-4.

Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 1990; 36: 275-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260360310

Walker GM. 125th anniversary review: fuel alcohol: current production and future challenges. J Inst Brew 2011; 117: 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00438.x

Murphy L, Cruys-Bager N, Damgaard HD, Baumann MJ, Olsen SN, Borch K, et al. Origin of initial burst in activity for Trichoderma reesei endo-glucanases hydrolyzing insoluble cellulose. J Biol Chem 2010; 287: 1252-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.276485

Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis. J Memb Sci 2009; 338: 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.011

Eranki PL, Bals BD, Dale BE. Advanced regional biomass processing depots: a key to the logistical challenges of the cellulosic biofuel industry. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 2011; 5: 621-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.318

Downloads

Published

2013-08-31

How to Cite

Savarese, J. J. (2013). Local Biomass Processing is Practical for Facilitating Fermentation to Bioethanol. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 2(3), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2013.02.03.5

Issue

Section

Articles