Nutritional Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions in Dairy Buffaloes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2026.15.08Keywords:
Buffalo nutrition, sustainability, methane, rumen, phytochemicals, feedsAbstract
Water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is an important multi-purpose ruminant species providing animal-based food and supporting rural communities' economic sustainability, especially in Asia. However, the specialized microbial consortium responsible for fiber degradation within the rumen also contributes to environmental degradation through enteric methane (CH4) generation, making methanogenesis reduction a pivotal challenge for the sector's sustainable development. As CH4 results from ruminal microbiota metabolism, nutritional interventions are regarded as having the greatest mitigation potential, although most studies have focused on cattle, and buffalo-specific data remain scarce. The literature offers a broad range of effective strategies, including modifications to the forage-to-concentrate ratio and dietary lipids and phytochemicals, with mitigation gains ranging from 10 to 80%. These strategies can reduce methanogenesis through several mechanisms, including direct inhibition of methanogenic archaea and protozoa, shifting fermentation pathways, or diverting hydrogen toward alternative sinks. However, in vivo studies in buffalo remain scarce, underscoring the need for future research that considers all CH4-relevant parameters within a holistic framework. The available literature remains limited and fragmented, underscoring the need for further research to understand species-specific responses and develop effective mitigation strategies under practical conditions. Therefore, this review comprehensively summarises current knowledge of nutritional interventions that have been shown to reduce CH4 production in buffalo without adverse effects on welfare or productivity. Additionally, given their influence on CH4 production and implications for species-specific responses, the main differences in digestive morphology, physiology, and rumen microbial ecology between buffalo and cattle are discussed, providing a comparative perspective to evaluate whether mitigation approaches developed for bovines can be effectively applied to buffaloes.
References
Wanapat M, Rowlinson P. Nutrition and feeding of swamp buffalo: Feed resources and rumen approach. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6(Suppl 2): 67-73.
Deb GK, Nahar TN, Duran PG, Presicce GA. Safe and sustainable traditional production: The water buffalo in Asia. Front Environ Sci 2016; 4: 38.
Javed K, Salman M, Sharif M, Ahmad N, Shahzad MA, Ashraf M, et al. Nutritional requirements of dairy buffalo. Braz J Sci 2022; 1(9): 1-8.
Wanapat M, Kang S, Phesatcha K. Enhancing buffalo production efficiency through rumen manipulation and nutrition. Buffalo Bull 2013; 32(Spec Issue 1): 258-275.
Borghese A. Development and perspective of buffalo and buffalo market in Europe and Near East. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Buffalo Congress 2010; Buenos Aires, Argentina. p. 25-28.
Sabia E, Napolitano F, Claps S, Braghieri A, Piazzolla N, Pacelli C. Feeding, nutrition and sustainability in dairy enterprises: The case of Mediterranean buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). In: Vastola A, editor. The Sustainability of Agro-Food and Natural Resource Systems in the Mediterranean Basin. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2015. p. 57-64.
Becskei Z, Savić M, Ćirković D, Milićević V, Dimitrijević B, Lakićević B, et al. Assessment of water buffalo milk and traditional milk products in a sustainable production system. Sustainability 2020; 12(16): 6616.
do Amaral Junior JM, Martorano LG, de Souza Nahúm B, Lourenço Júnior JB, Garcia AR, Silva AGM, et al. Feed intake, emission of enteric methane and estimates, feed efficiency, and ingestive behavior in buffaloes supplemented with palm kernel cake in the Amazon biome. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9: 1053005.
Lotito D, Pacifico E, Matuozzo S, De Matteis G, Napolitano F, Sabia E, et al. Colostrum composition, characteristics and management for buffalo calves: A review. Vet Sci 2023; 10(5): 358.
Zicarelli L. Reproductive seasonality in buffalo. Bubalus Bubalis 1997; 4(Suppl 29): 52-54.
Infascelli F, Gigli S, Campanile G. Buffalo meat production: Performance infra vitam and quality of meat. Vet Res Commun 2004; 28(Suppl 1): 143-148.
Tudisco R, Morittu VM, Musco N, Grossi M, Mastellone V, Lombardi P, et al. Effects of sorghum silage in lactating buffalo cow diet: Biochemical profile, milk yield, and quality. Agriculture 2021; 11(1): 57.
Infascelli L, Musco N, Iommelli P, Tudisco R, Grossi M, Lombardi P, et al. Diet with high forage: Concentrate ratio improves milk nutritional properties and economic sustainability of buffalo breeding. Animals 2025; 15(14): 2050.
Tufarelli V, Puvača N, Glamočić D, Pugliese G, Colonna MA. The most important metabolic diseases in dairy cattle during the transition period. Animals 2024; 14(5): 816.
Mota-Rojas D, Napolitano F, Fischer V, Orihuela A, Strappini A, Sabia E, et al. Water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) as a sustainable alternative in the context of climate change. Front Anim Sci 2026; 7: 1747986.
Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al. Technical summary. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A, Falcucci A, Tempio G, MacLeod M, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains: A global life cycle assessment. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC 2014.
Malik PK, Trivedi S, Mohapatra A, Kolte AP, Sejian V, Bhatta R, et al. Comparison of enteric methane yield and diversity of ruminal methanogens in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. PLoS One 2021; 16(8): e0256048.
Pirlo G, Carè S, Fantin V, Falconi F, Buttol P, Terzano GM, et al. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on six Mediterranean buffalo farms. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97(10): 6583-6593.
Lanzoni L, Chagunda MGG, Fusaro I, Bernabucci U, Vitali A, Sabia E, et al. Assessment of seasonal variation in methane emissions of Mediterranean buffaloes using a laser methane detector. Animals 2022; 12(24): 3487.
Talukdar P, Kundu SS, Mondal G. Quantification of methane emissions from Murrah buffaloes fed different energy diets during various temperature humidity index periods in a tropical environment. Anim Prod Sci 2018; 59(1): 169-176.
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, et al. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013. p. xxi-115.
Haque MN. Dietary manipulation: A sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. J Anim Sci Technol 2018; 60(1): 15.
Sabia E, Napolitano F, Claps S, De Rosa G, Braghieri A, Pacelli C, et al. Environmental impact of dairy buffalo heifers kept on pasture or in confinement. Agric Syst 2018; 159: 42-49.
Sabia E, Napolitano F, Claps S, De Rosa G, Barile VL, Braghieri A, et al. Dairy buffalo life cycle assessment as affected by heifer rearing system. J Clean Prod 2018 192: 647-655.
Sirohi SK, Singh N, Dagar SS, Puniya AK. Molecular tools for deciphering the microbial community structure and diversity in rumen ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 95(5): 1135-1154.
Tong F, Wang T, Gao NL, Liu Z, Cui K, Duan Y, et al. The microbiome of the buffalo digestive tract. Nat Commun 2022; 13(1): 823.
Silva ÉBR, Silva JAR, Silva WC, Lima AR, Carvalho Júnior RN, Oliveira AC, et al. A review of the rumen microbiota and the different molecular techniques used to identify microorganisms found in the rumen fluid of ruminants. Animals 2024; 14(10): 1448.
Kim M, Park T, Yu Z. Metagenomic investigation of gastrointestinal microbiome in cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30(11): 1515-1528.
Vasta V, Daghio M, Cappucci A, Buccioni A, Serra A, Viti C, et al. Invited review: Plant polyphenols and rumen microbiota responsible for fatty acid biohydrogenation, fiber digestion, and methane emission: Experimental evidence and methodological approaches. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102(5): 3781-3804.
Singh KM, Tripathi AK, Pandya PR, Parnerkar S, Kothari RK, Joshi CG. Molecular genetic diversity and quantitation of methanogen in ruminal fluid of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed ration (wheat straw and concentrate mixture diet). Genet Res Int 2013 2013: 980191.
Króliczewska B, Pecka-Kiełb E, Bujok J. Strategies used to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: Controversies and issues. Agriculture 2023; 13(3): 602.
Patra AK. Prediction of enteric methane emission from cattle using linear and non-linear statistical models in tropical production systems. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 2017; 22(4): 629-650.
Sharma VK, Kundu SS, Datt C, Prusty S, Kumar M, Sontakke UB. Buffalo heifers selected for lower residual feed intake have lower feed intake, better dietary nitrogen utilisation and reduced enteric methane production. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2018; 102(2): e607-e614.
Lualhati C, Managa KR, Castillo C, Llantada PL, Del Barrio A. Effects of probiotic supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and enteric methane emission of growing dairy buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis L.). Philipp Agric Sci 2025; 108(2): 119-130.
Paul SS, Dey A, Chanu YM, Malik PK, Kamra DN, Bhatta R, et al. Altered rumen microbiome of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) by dietary composite feed additive enhances growth and nutrient utilization with reduced enteric methane and nitrogen emissions. J Environ Manage 2026; 397: 128347.
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen PH. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep 2015; 5(1): 14567.
Della Rosa MM, Waghorn GC, Vibart RE, Jonker A. An assessment of global ruminant methane-emission measurements shows bias relative to contributions of farmed species, populations and among continents. Anim Prod Sci 2022; 63(3): 201-212.
Sarwar M, Khan MA, Nisa M, Bhatti SA, Shahzad MA. Nutritional management for buffalo production. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2009; 22(7): 1060-1068.
Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J 2013; 7(6): 1069-1079.
Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams AG. Livestock and climate change: Impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front 2019; 9(1): 69-76.
Bertoni A, Napolitano F, Mota-Rojas D, Sabia E, Alvarez-Macias A, Mora-Medina P, et al. Similarities and differences between river buffaloes and cattle: Health, physiological, behavioral and productivity aspects. J Buffalo Sci 2020; 9: 92-109.
Campanile G, Neglia G, Vecchio D, Di Palo R, Gasparrini B, Zicarelli L. Protein nutrition and nitrogen balance in buffalo cows. CABI Rev 2010; 5: 1-8.
Wang Q, Gao X, Yang Y, Zou C, Yang Y, Lin B. A comparative study on rumen ecology of water buffalo and cattle calves under similar feeding regime. Vet Med Sci 2020; 6(4): 746-754.
Wanapat M, Pilajun R, Kongmun P. Ruminal ecology of swamp buffalo as influenced by dietary sources. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009; 151(3-4): 205-214.
Thanh VTK. The effect on intake digestibility and microbial protein production of adding urea to rice straw for cattle and buffalo calves. Livest Sci 2012; 150(1-3): 111-113.
Sinha SK, Chaturvedi VB, Verma AK, Patil AK, Shivani S. Effect of feeding total mixed ration on methane emission and energy metabolism in crossbred cattle and buffaloes. J Anim Res 2016; 6(6): 921-926.
Kawashima T, Sumamal W, Pholsen P, Chaithiang R, Kurihara M. Comparative study on energy and nitrogen metabolisms between Brahman cattle and swamp buffalo fed with low quality diet. JARQ 2006; 40(2): 183-188.
Sarwar M, Khan MA, Nisa MU, Touqir NA. Influence of berseem and lucerne silages on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and milk yield in lactating Nili buffaloes. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2005; 18(4): 475-478.
Singh S, Pradhan K, Sangwan DC, Sagar V. Relative rumen microbial profile of cattle and buffalo fed wheat straw-concentrate diet. Indian J Anim Sci 1992; 62(12): 1197-1202.
Angulo RA, Noguera RR, Berdugo JA. The water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): An efficient user of nutrients; aspects on fermentation and ruminal digestion. Livest Res Rural Dev 2005; 17: 67.
Bartocci S, Amici A, Verna M, Terramoccia S, Martillotti F. Solid and fluid passage rate in buffalo, cattle and sheep fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Livest Prod Sci 1997; 52(3): 201-208.
Mendes AJ, de Lima-Francisco C. Aspectos nutricionales del búfalo. Rev Tecnol Marcha 2011; 24(5): 95-105.
Iqbal MW, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Li L, Zou C, Huang C, et al. Comparative study of rumen fermentation and microbial community differences between water buffalo and Jersey cows under similar feeding conditions. J Appl Anim Res 2018; 46(1): 740-748.
Aguilar-Marin SB, Betancur-Murillo CL, Isaza GA, Mesa H, Jovel J. Lower methane emissions were associated with higher abundance of ruminal Prevotella in a cohort of Colombian buffalos. BMC Microbiol 2020 20(1): 364.
Bandarupalli VVK, St-Pierre B. Identification of a candidate starch utilizing strain of Prevotella albensis from bovine rumen. Microorganisms 2020; 8(12): 2005.
Wora-Anu S, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C, Nontaso N. Effect of roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal ecology and voluntary feed intake in cattle and swamp buffaloes fed on urea-treated rice straw. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000; 13(Suppl): 236.
Chanthakhoun V, Wanapat M, Kongmun P, Cherdthong A. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livest Sci 2012; 143(2-3): 172-176.
Sarwar M, Shahzad MA, Nisa M, Bhatti SA, Tauqir NA. Enhancing buffalo productivity through usage of low quality feed stuffs. J Anim Plant Sci 2012; 22(Suppl): 128-132.
Chaudhary PP, Sirohi SK, Saxena J. Diversity analysis of methanogens in rumen of Bubalus bubalis by 16S riboprinting and sequence analysis. Gene 2012; 493(1): 13-17.
Franzolin R, St-Pierre B, Northwood K, Wright ADG. Analysis of rumen methanogen diversity in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) under three different diets. Microb Ecol 2012; 64(1): 131-139.
Samal L, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal N, Kamra DN. Effects of plants containing secondary metabolites as feed additives on rumen metabolites and methanogen diversity of buffaloes. Anim Prod Sci 2016; 56(3): 472-481.
Calabrò S, Infascelli F, Tudisco R, Musco N, Grossi M, Monastra G, et al. Estimation of in vitro methane production in buffalo and cow. Buffalo Bull 2013; 32(2): 924-927.
Ungerfeld EM. Corrigendum: Shifts in metabolic hydrogen sinks in the methanogenesis-inhibited ruminal fermentation: A meta-analysis. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 538.
Garg MR, Kannan A, Phondba BT, Shelke SK, Sherasia PL. A study on the effect of ration balancing for improving milk production and reducing methane emission in lactating buffaloes under field conditions. Indian J Dairy Sci 2012; 65(3): 250-255.
Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Müller B, Schnürer A, et al. Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 226.
Prusty S, Mohini M, Kundu SS, Kumar A, Datt C. Methane emissions from river buffaloes fed on green fodders in relation to the nutrient intake and digestibility. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014; 46(1): 65-70.
Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ. The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017; 8(1): 7.
Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, et al. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: Microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003; 27(5): 663-693.
Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 2000; 49(3): 231-253.
Wang K, Xiong B, Zhao X. Could propionate formation be used to reduce enteric methane emission in ruminants? Sci Total Environ 2023; 855: 158867.
Patra AK. Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: A synthesis of current research and future directions. Environ Monit Assess 2012; 184(4): 1929-1952.
Sharma AN, Kumar S, Tyagi AK. Effects of mannan-oligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilization and faecal characteristics in Murrah buffalo calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2018; 102(3): 679-689.
Prusty S, Jha N, Kundu SS, Bala PA, Kumar A, Datt C. Nutritional evaluation of chicory, berseem and oats fodders in growing buffalo calves. Indian J Anim Nutr 2012; 29(2): 157-160.
Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn GC, et al. Special topics—Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J Anim Sci 2013; 91(11): 5045-5069.
Dey A, Attri K, Dahiya SS, Paul SS. Influence of dietary phytogenic feed additives on lactation performance, methane emissions and health status of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). J Sci Food Agric 2021; 101(10): 4390-4397.
Eugène M, Klumpp K, Sauvant D. Methane mitigating options with forages fed to ruminants. Grass Forage Sci 2021; 76(2): 196-204.
Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS. Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011; 166-167: 291-301.
Lawrence P, Kenny DA, Earley B, McGee M. Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. Livest Sci 2013; 152(2-3): 154-166.
Bezerra LR, Sarmento JLR, Neto SG, de Paula NRO, Oliveira RL, do Rêgo WMF. Residual feed intake: A nutritional tool for genetic improvement. Trop Anim Health Prod 2013; 45(8): 1649-1661.
Singh S, Kushwaha BP, Nag SK, Mishra AK, Bhattacharya S, Gupta PK, et al. In vitro methane emission from Indian dry roughages in relation to chemical composition. Curr Sci 2011; 101(1): 57-65.
Kamble AB, Puniya M, Kundu SS, Shelke SK, Mohini M. Evaluation of forages in terms of carbohydrate, nitrogen fractions and methane production. Indian J Anim Nutr 2011; 28(3): 231-238.
van Gastelen S, Dijkstra J, Bannink A. Are dietary strategies to mitigate enteric methane emission equally effective across dairy cattle, beef cattle, and sheep? J Dairy Sci 2019; 102(7): 6109-6130.
Prusty S, Kundu SS, Sharma VK. Nutrient utilization and methane emissions in Murrah buffalo calves fed on diets with different methanogenic potential. Livest Sci 2017 202: 89-95.
Hassanat F, Gervais R, Julien C, Massé DI, Lettat A, Chouinard PY, et al. Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: Effects on enteric methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96(7): 4553-4567.
Sarubbi F, Chiariotti A, Baculo R, Contò G, Huws SA. Nutritive value of maize and sorghum silages: Fibre fraction degradation and rumen microbial density in buffalo cows. Czech J Anim Sci 2014; 59(6): 278-287.
Sherasia PL, Garg MR, Bhanderi BM. Effect of feeding balanced rations on production efficiency and enteric methane emission in lactating buffaloes under tropical conditions. Buffalo Bull 2014; 33(4): 45-51.
Sherasia PL, Garg MR, Phondba BT, Hossain SA, Patel BP. Milk production, methane emission, metabolic profile and drinking water use efficiency of lactating animals fed balanced rations. Anim Nutr Feed Technol 2016; 16: 239-250.
Chaokaur A, Nishida T, Phaowphaisal I, Sommart K. Effects of feeding level on methane emissions and energy utilization of Brahman cattle in the tropics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2015 199: 225-230.
Nampoothiri VM, Mohini M, Malla BA, Mondal G, Pandita S. Growth performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions from Murrah calves fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Anim Nutr 2018; 4(2): 215-221.
Patra AK. The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: A meta-analysis. Livest Sci 2013; 155(2-3): 244-254.
Dey A, Paul SS, Dahiya SS, Punia BS. Effects of vegetable oils supplementation on in vitro rumen fermentation, volatile fatty acid composition and methane production in buffaloes. Buffalo Bull 2018; 37(1): 37-44.
Dey A, Paul SS, Lailer PC, Dahiya SS. Efficacy of sunflower oil in modulating rumen functions and reducing enteric methane production in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Res Biotica 2020; 2(2): 61-66.
Li M, Hassan FU, Peng L, Ebeid HM, Tang Z, Xie F, et al. Dietary treatment with omega fatty acids mediates in vitro rumen fermentation kinetics and reduces methane emission in water buffalo. Trop J Pharm Res 2021 20(9): 1801-1809.
Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM. Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(6): 1489-1496.
Newbold CJ, Lassalas B, Jouany JP. The importance of methanogens associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol 1995; 21(4): 230-234.
Wanapat M, Mapato C, Pilajun R, Toburan W. Effects of vegetable oil supplementation on feed intake, rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristic of growing swamp buffaloes. Livest Sci 2011; 135(1): 32-37.
Naik PK, Saijpaul S, Rani N. Effect of ruminally protected fat on in vitro fermentation and apparent nutrient digestibility in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009; 153(1-2): 68-76.
Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90(6): 2580-2595.
Rochfort S, Parker AJ, Dunshea FR. Plant bioactives for ruminant health and productivity. Phytochemistry 2008; 69(2): 299-322.
Vasta V, Luciano G. The effects of tannins on rumen fermentation and animal production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011; 166-167: 1-15.
Robins JG, Waldron BL, Jensen KB. Productivity, stability, and resilience of cool-season perennial grasses used for rangeland revegetation. Agrosyst Geosci Environ 2020; 3(1): e20002.
Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N. Effect of spices on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and protozoa counts in in vitro gas production test. Int Congr Ser 2006; 1293: 176-179.
Samal L, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal N, Kamra DN. Impact of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance, nutrient digestion and methanogenesis in growing buffaloes. Anim Prod Sci 2018; 58(6): 1056-1063.
Kamra DN, Patra AK, Chatterjee PN, Kumar R, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC. Effect of plant extracts on methanogenesis and microbial profile of the rumen of buffalo: A brief overview. Aust J Exp Agric 2008; 48(2): 175-178.
Agarwal N, Kamra DN, Chaudhary LC, Sahoo A. Effect of Sapindus mukorossi extract on rumen fermentation, protozoa and methane production in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) rumen liquor. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006; 129(1-2): 152-161.
Manh NS, Wanapat M, Uriyapongson S, Khejornsart P, Chanthakhoun V. Effect of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) leaf meal powder on rumen fermentation characteristics in cattle fed on rice straw. Afr J Agric Res 2012; 7(14): 2142-2148.
Tavendale MH, Meagher LP, Pacheco D, Walker N, Attwood GT, Sivakumaran S. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005; 123-124: 403-419.
Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91(1): 24-37.
Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW. Methanogens: Methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea 2010 2010: 945785.
Naumann HD, Tedeschi LO, Zeller WE, Huntley NF. The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: Advances, limitations and future directions. Rev Bras Zootec 2017; 46(12): 929-949.
Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR. Early indications that feeding Lotus will reduce methane emissions from ruminants. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 2001; 61: 23-26.
McAllister TA, Bae HD, Yanke LJ, Cheng KJ, Muir AD. Effect of condensed tannins from birdsfoot trefoil on endoglucanase activity and the digestion of cellulose filter paper by ruminal fungi. Can J Microbiol 1994; 40(4): 298-305.
Hervás G, Frutos P, Giráldez FJ, Mantecón ÁR, Del Pino MCA. Effect of different doses of quebracho tannin extract on rumen fermentation in ewes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003; 109(1-4): 65-78.
Costa M, Alves SP, Cappucci A, Cook SR, Duarte A, Caldeira RM, et al. Effects of condensed and hydrolyzable tannins on rumen metabolism with emphasis on the biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids. J Agric Food Chem 2018; 66(13): 3367-3377.
Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC. Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds. Int Congr Ser 2006; 1293: 156-163.
Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC. Effect of Yucca schidigera extract on rumen fermentation and methane production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000; 88(1-2): 1-10.
Wang Y, McAllister TA, Newbold CJ, Rode LM, Cheeke PR, Cheng KJ. Effects of Yucca schidigera extract on fermentation and degradation of steroidal saponins in the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Anim Feed Sci Technol 1998; 74(2): 143-153.
Lila ZA, Mohammed N, Kanda S, Kamada T, Itabashi H. Effect of sarsaponin on ruminal fermentation with particular reference to methane production in vitro. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86(10): 3330-3336.
Hess HD, Kreuzer M, Díaz TE, Lascano CE, Carulla JE, Soliva CR, et al. Saponin-rich tropical fruits affect fermentation and methanogenesis in faunated and defaunated rumen fluid. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003; 109(1-4): 79-94.
Baah J, Hristov AN, McAllister TA, Ivan M, Koenig KM, Rode LM. Evaluation of quillaja extract, quebracho tannin and safflower oil as selective defaunating agents in cattle. J Anim Sci 2002; 80(Suppl 1): 404.
Broudiscou LP, Papon Y, Broudiscou AF. Effects of dry plant extracts on fermentation and methanogenesis in continuous culture of rumen microbes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000; 87(3-4): 263-277.
Cheeke PR. Actual and potential applications of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria saponins in human and animal nutrition. In: Oleszek W, Marston A, editors. Saponins in Food, Feedstuffs and Medicinal Plants. Dordrecht: Springer 2000. p.241-254.
Wang Y, McAllister TA, Yanke LJ, Xu ZJ, Cheeke PR, Cheng KJ. In vitro effects of steroidal saponins from Yucca schidigera extract on rumen microbial protein synthesis and ruminal fermentation. J Sci Food Agric 2000; 80(14): 2114-2122.
Inamdar AI, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal N, Kamra DN. Effect of Madhuca longifolia and Terminalia chebula on methane production and nutrient utilization in buffaloes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015 201: 38-45.
Cardozo PW, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C. Effects of alfalfa extract, anise, capsicum, and a mixture of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol on ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in beef heifers fed a high-concentrate diet. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(10): 2801-2808.
Yang WZ, Ametaj BN, Benchaar C, Beauchemin KA. Dose response to cinnamaldehyde supplementation in growing beef heifers: Ruminal and intestinal digestion. J Anim Sci 2010; 88(2): 680-688.
Kumar K. Effects of feed additives rich in essential oils on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and nutrient utilization in buffalo [master's thesis]. Hisar (India): Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2017.
Philippeau C, Lettat A, Martin C, Silberberg M, Morgavi DP, Ferlay A, et al. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal characteristics, methane emission, and milk fatty acid composition in cows fed high- or low-starch diets. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100(4): 2637-2650.
Elmetwaly MA, El-Sysy MAI, Khalifa HH, Safwat MA. Effect of dietary live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on some productive traits and methane production of lactating buffaloes under heat stress. Egypt J Nutr Feeds 2022; 25(2): 135-147.
Tyagi AK, Kumar S, Balaga S, Barman K. Nutritional strategies for maximizing buffalo production efficiency. Rev Cient Fac Cienc Vet 2023; 33: 51-57.
Singh B, Mal G, Kalra RS, Marotta F. Probiotics against methanogens and methanogenesis. In: Marotta F, editor. Probiotics as Live Biotherapeutics for Veterinary and Human Health. Vol. 1. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland 2024. p.355-376.
Thacharodi A, Hassan S, Ahmed ZT, Singh P, Maqbool M, Meenatchi R, et al. The ruminant gut microbiome vs enteric methane emission: The essential microbes may help to mitigate the global methane crisis. Environ Res 2024; 261: 119661.
Varada VV, Kumar S, Chhotaray S, Tyagi AK. Host-specific probiotics feeding influence growth, gut microbiota, and fecal biomarkers in buffalo calves. AMB Express 2022; 12(1): 118.
Mousa SA, Marwan AA. Growth performance, rumen fermentation and selected biochemical indices in buffalo calves fed Bacillus subtilis-supplemented diet. Inter J Vet Sci 2019; 8(3): 151-156.
Oh J, Harper M, Melgar A, Compart DP, Hristov AN. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based direct-fed microbial and exogenous enzyme products on enteric methane emission and productivity in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102(7): 6065-6075.
Lakhani N, Kamra DN, Kala A, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC, Chaturvedi VB. Effects of dietary supplementation with rumen modifier and sodium sulphate on methane production and performance of buffalo calves. Anim Nutr Feed Technol 2019 19(2): 169-180.
Petrocchi Jasinski F, Evangelista C, Basiricò L, Bernabucci U. Responses of dairy buffalo to heat stress conditions and mitigation strategies: A review. Animals 2023; 13(7): 1260.
Orzuna-Orzuna JF, Godina-Rodríguez JE, Garay-Martínez JR, Lara-Bueno A. Capsaicin as a dietary additive for dairy cows: A meta-analysis on performance, milk composition, digestibility, rumen fermentation, and serum metabolites. Animals 2024; 14(7): 1075.
Petrocchi Jasinski F, Evangelista C, Basiricò L, Iacurto M, Steri R, Meo Zilio D, et al. Responses to a nutritional supplement of lactating buffaloes exposed to hot weather conditions. Ital J Anim Sci 2025; 24(1): 1557-1572.
Patra AK, Yu Z. Effects of garlic oil, nitrate, saponin and their combinations supplemented to different substrates on in vitro fermentation, ruminal methanogenesis, and abundance and diversity of microbial populations. Journal of Appl Microbiol 2015; 119(1): 127-138.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work