Current Trends in Buffalo Milk Production

Authors

  • Luigi Zicarelli Professor Emeritus, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, Università Federico II, 80137 Napoli, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.14

Keywords:

Buffalo milk, world buffalo milk, italian buffalo milk.

Abstract

Between 1961 and 2018 on the total number of dairy ruminants, the percentage of buffaloes and the quantity of milk produced by them had an increasing trend from 3.7% to 5.2% and from 5.4 to 15.7%, respectively; this value on the world total "cow milk + buffalo milk" rose to 18.64%.

In the Asian continent, buffaloes' incidence on the total number of dairy ruminants increased slightly (from 10.2% to 11.7%) while the percentage of cattle fell from 38% to 26.4%. In the same period, the percentage of buffalo milk decreased from 44.6% to 36.9%, while cow milk shares increased from 55.4% to 63%.

The percentage of milk produced in Pakistan, India, Nepal (after 2010), and especially in Egypt showed a downward trend. In Italy, the trend has always been increasing.

The market price of buffalo milk in developing countries does not compensate for costs which are 15% higher than cow's milk, if only the cost of feeding is considered, and increases to 40% when the difference in kg of milk equivalent between the two species is about 900 kg per lactation. A reduction of the production gap between the two species is difficult to be achieved because the genetic improvement of dairy cattle is performed in industrialized countries with higher financial support. Therefore, a marketing effort is needed to make well-differentiated buffalo products with specific and well-received sensory properties. In this regard, it should also be noted that δ-valerobetaine, a bioactive molecule beneficial for human health, is present in buffalo milk and meat in higher quantities than in cow's milk.

References

Zicarelli L, Campanile G. La storia del bufalo. Mozzarelle di bufala. (The history of the buffalo. Buffalo mozzarella cheese) Ed. Slow Food 2001.

Stefano Sassi, 2014. www.worldpass marajo brasile

HTTP://faostat.fao.org/faostat

Bartocci S, Amici A, Verna M, Terramoccia S, Martillotti F. Solid and fluid passage rate in buffalo, cattle and sheep feds diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Livest Prod Sci 1997; 52: 201-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00132-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00132-2

Zicarelli L. Nutrition in dairy buffaloes. Bubalus bubalis 2001; 1-66.

Zicarelli L. Nutrition in dairy buffaloes. Perspectives of buffalo husbandry in Brazil and Latin America. Editores Prof. Tonhati, Prof. V.H. Barnabe, prof. P.S.baruselli, Funep., Jabuticabal 1999; 157-178.

Zicarelli L. Management in different environmental conditions. Buf J 1994; Suppl 2: 17-38.

Zicarelli L. Reproductive seasonality in buffalo. In: Proceedings of the Third Course on Biotechnology of Reproduction in Buffaloes (Issue II) 1997; pp. 29-52.

Zicarelli L. Enhancing reproductive performance in domestic dairy water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2010; 67: 443-455. https://doi.org/10.5661/RDR-VII-443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7313/UPO9781907284991.034

Hassan F, Khan MS, Rehman MS, Sarwar M, Bhatti SA. Seasonality of calving in Nili-RaviBuffaloes, purebred Sahiwal and crossbred cattle in Pakistan. Ital J Anirm Sci 2007; 6(Suppl. 2): 1298-1301. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1298

Zicarelli L. Influence of seasonality on buffalo production. In: Precisse GA, editor. The Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)-Production and research. Sharjah, UAE: Bentham Science Publishers; 2017; pp. 196-224. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681084176117010011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681084176117010011

International Farm Comparison Network 2004. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08cabed915d622c0014bb/PPLPIwp16.pdf

Dairying in Odisha, A Statistical Profile 2016, National Dairy Development Board. PB No 40, Anand 388 001 PB No 40, Anand 388 001, Pag. 1-127. PB No 40, Anand 388 001 PB No 40, Anand 388 001, Pag. 1-127.

Servillo L, D'Onofrio N, Neglia G, Casale R, Cautela D, Marrelli M, Limone A, Campanile G, Balestrieri ML. Carnitine Precursors and Short-Chain Acylcarnitines in Water Buffalo Milk. J Agric Food Chem 2018; 66(30): 8142-8149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02963

L, D'Onofrio N, Giovane A, Casale R, Cautela D, Castaldo D, Iannaccone F, Neglia G, Campanile G, Balestrieri ML. Ruminant meat and milk contain δ-valerobetaine, another precursor of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) like γ-butyrobetaine. Food Chem 2018; 260: 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.114

D'Onofrio N, Balestrieri A, Neglia G, Monaco A, Tatullo M. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30661355/ - affiliation-4, Casale R, Limone A, Balestrieri ML, Campanile G. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Buffalo Milk δ-Valerobetaine. J Agric Food Chem 2019; 67(6): 1702-1710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07166

Downloads

Published

2020-08-13

How to Cite

Zicarelli, L. . (2020). Current Trends in Buffalo Milk Production. Journal of Buffalo Science, 9, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2020.09.14

Issue

Section

Articles