Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Inclusion of Default Clauses in Indonesia

Siti Malikhatun  Badriyah; R.  Suharto; Marjo; Retno  Saraswati; Muhammad Shafiyuddin  Wafi

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05

Authors

Siti Malikhatun Badriyah Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
R. Suharto Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
Marjo Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
Retno Saraswati Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
Muhammad Shafiyuddin Wafi Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05

Keywords:

Fiduciary Guarantee, Execution, Default Clauses, Implementation.

Abstract

The existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, made problems in society related to the implementation of the fiduciary guarantee execution. This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The research method used is normative juridical by conducting document studies of legal principles, legal regulations and legal norms in Indonesia and interviews with civil law experts. The results showed that the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, caused disagreements in its implementation. Prior to the Constitutional Court Decision, the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee was based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, if the debtor in default, the Fiduciary Recipient can execute on the basis of the fiduciary recipient's own power to sell the object of fiduciary security, but with a Constitutional Court Decision it must go through a court. This creates confusion for creditors and is against the principle of material security. This is detrimental to creditors, because creditors cannot immediately sell their own fiduciary collateral objects if the debtor defaults. This phenomenon can lead to a lack of legal certainty and legal protection for fiduciary recipients and contradicts the nature of fiduciary guarantees which should have strong guarantee rights and are easy to implement.

References

Alizon, J. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Eksekusi, 2(1), 58-82. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v2i1.13167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24014/je.v2i1.9741

Badriyah, S. M., Mahmudah, S., Soemarmi, A., & Kamello, T. (2019). Leasing Agreement on Financing SMEs in Fisheries Industry. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(3), 1-7.

Badriyah, S., Mahmudah, S., Marjo, M., & Kashadi, K. (2018). The Re-Orientation of Use Option Right in the Financial Lease Contract for Small and Medium Enterprises Development in Indonesia. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3): 581–591.

Bhanot, S. P. (2017). Cheap promises: Evidence from loan repayment pledges in an online experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 140, 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.007

idabad, B. (2017). Mortgage Securitization System (MSS) (a complementary system of Rastin Banking). International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 778-783. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2016-0045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2016-0045

Badrulzaman, M. D. (1991). Mencari Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional. Bandung: Alumni.

Efferin, James Ridwan. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019.” Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 1 (2020): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789

Fuady, M. (2002). Pengantar hukum bisnis: Menata bisnis modern di era global. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fuady, M. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Gai, L., Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2016). SMEs, public credit guarantees and mutual guarantee institutions. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 23(4), 1208-1228. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2016-0046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2016-0046

Hartono, A. P. (2019). Credit Agreement with Fiduciary Collateral in the Form of a Patent in the Perspective of Indonesian Law. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.759

Kamello, T., & Fidusia, H. J. (2014). Suatu Kebutuhan yang didambakan. Bandung: Alumni.

Kamsilaniah; Abbas, Nurhayati; Patittingi, Farida; Miru, Ahmadi. (2018). The Existence of Stage House as Fiduciary Guarantee: Perspective of Horizontal Separation Principle. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 75, 116.

Kim, S. M. (2019). Reduction clause in an advance payment guarantee (AP-bond) under an overseas construction contract. Journal of Korea Trade, 23(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-06-2018-0050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-06-2018-0050

Ostrom, A., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). The effect of guarantees on consumers' evaluation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 12(5), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049810235405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049810235405

Sanusi, S. (2017). Legal Protection of the Creditor on Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Unlisted in the Fiduciary Registration Office. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 1(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v1i1.1636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v1i1.1636

Suprabowo, B., Mashdurohatun, A., & Suparman, E. (2017). The Inhibiting Factors On Legal Protection For Recipients Of Fidusiary Warranties With Inventory Guaranted Objects. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 13, 2289-1560.

Syafrida, S., & Hartati, R. (2020). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019. Adil: Jurnal Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1447