Joint Functional Focus of Models of Civil Liability for Damage Inflicted on Patients

Authors

  • Volodymyr Prymak Department of International Private and Comparative Law, Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Olga Koreniuk Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Tatiana Poharchenko Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.47

Keywords:

Medical services, compensation for property and moral (non-pecuniary) damage, fault, insurance, legal regulation

Abstract

One of the key areas of legal regulation of any aspect of public life (especially when it comes to personal moral rights inalienable from a person, including those that ensure the person's physical existence and reflect the human dignity inherent in every individual) is the establishment of legal guarantees for the observance and protection of subjective rights belonging to a person. The purpose of this study is to determine the centripetal (in value and functional terms) trends in the development and application of similar legal models and means of legal regulation of relations arising from harm inflicted on patients. It was concluded on the inevitability of the intensification of the world, and European, in particular, tendencies regarding the diverse use by national legal systems of similar functional legal instruments for compensation for property and moral damage in order to ensure effective protection of personal non-property and property rights of patients and related persons. Therewith, the identity of a certain national legal mechanism will be determined mainly by the orientation of the legal policy of a particular state towards the top-priority implementation of certain characteristics of compensation and proactive, preventive (which, in the context under consideration, appears as a guarantee for the observance of the rights of patients and the performance of obligations by the providers of medical services) functions of civil liability.

References

Bączyk-Rozwadowska, Kinga. 2011. “Medical malpractice and compensation in Poland”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 86(3): 1220-1221.

Bagińska, Ewa. 2015. “Poland: Developments in personal injury law in Poland: Shaping the compensatory function of tort law”. Journal of Civil Law Studies 8: 333-336.

Bennett, Georgia, Meng‐Wong Taing, Laetitia Hattingh and Adam La Caze. 2020. “Pharmacists' perceived responsibility for patient care when there is a risk of misadventure: A qualitative study”. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 28(6): 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12580

Comandé, Giovanni. 2014. “Italy”. In: H. Nys (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Medical Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Conk, George. 2020. “Translation: Tort liability – section 7 – Civil Code of the people’s Republic of China”. Fordham Law Legal Studies Research, 3624921. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624921

Daller, Morton and Nicholas Daller. 2019. Tort law desk reference: A fifty-state compendium. New York: Wolters Kluwer.

Dostál, Ondrej. 2011. “Medical liability in Сzech Republic”. In: B.A. Koch (Ed.), Medical Liability in Europe: A Comparison of Selected Jurisdictions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260168.97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260168.97

Farmonovich, Fayziyev. 2019. “Medical law and features of legal relations arising in the provision of medical services”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 11(3): 1197-1200.

German Civil Code. 2002. Retrieved November 15, 2020. (https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p0761)

Guide on Article 13 of the Convention – Right to an effective remedy. 2020. (https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_ 13_ENG.pdf)

Hyslop, Edward Ian. 2015. European causation in tort law: A comparative study with emphasis on medical law in the United Kingdom, Germany and France and Luxembourg: a thesis submitted for a degree of PhD in law. Esch-Sur-Alzette: University of Luxembourg.

Koch, Bernhard. 2013. “Medical malpractice in Austria”. In: K. Oliphant, R.W. Wright (Eds.), Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110270235.7

Martin, Ellen, Jeannette Kraft, Rochelle Wilder and Helen Bryant. 2020. “Safeguarding children in trauma and orthopaedics”. Orthopaedics and Trauma 34(6): 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2020.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2020.09.008

Palmer, Vernon. 2015. The recovery of non-pecuniary loss in European contract law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316162378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316162378

Phillips, Andelka, Thana C. de Campos and Jonathan Herring. 2019. Philosophical foundations of medical law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796558.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796558.001.0001

Rijnhout, Rianka and Jessy Emaus. 2014. “Damages in wrongful death cases in the light of European human rights law: towards a rights-based approach to the law of damages”. Utrecht Law Review 10(3): 91-106. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.286

Schäfer, Hans-Bernd and Frank Müller-Langer. 2008. “Strict liability versus negligence”. German Working Papers in Law and Economics 5: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2062787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2062787

Sharkey, Catherine. 2005. “Unintended consequences of medical malpractice”. New York University Law Review 80(2): 399-405.

Sommer, Steffen, Rene Geissler, Ulrike Stampfl, Maya B Wolf, Boris Alexis Radeleff, Goetz Richter, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Philippe Pereira and Christof Sommer. 2016. “Medical liability and patient law in Germany: Main features with particular focus on treatments in the field of interventional radiology”. RöFo – Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 188(4): 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108198

Tatu, Daniela. 2018. Medical negligence: In the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Milan: Key Editore.

The tort liability law of the people’s Republic of China. 2009. (http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Law/2011-02/16/content_1620761.htm)

Watson, Kenneth, Rob Kottenhagen. 2018. “Patients’ rights, medical error and harmonisation of compensation mechanisms in Europe”. European Journal of Health Law 25: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12460348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12460348

Winiger, Bénédict, Koziol, Helmut, Bernhard Koch and Reinhard Zimmermann. 2011. Digest of European tort law. Vol. 2: Essential cases on damage. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110248494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110248494

WMA Statement on medical liability reform. 2015. Retrieved November 15, 2020: (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-medical-liability-reform/)

Downloads

Published

2021-02-02

How to Cite

Prymak, V. ., Koreniuk, O. ., & Poharchenko, T. . (2021). Joint Functional Focus of Models of Civil Liability for Damage Inflicted on Patients. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 393–399. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.47

Issue

Section

Special Issue: