Implementation of International Standards for Determining an Efficient Civil Law Remedy by a National Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.49Keywords:
Litigation, the remedy of private law, international standards, ECtHR, ECHRAbstract
The article is devoted to studying the effectiveness of protection of violated, unrecognised or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of individuals, rights and interests of legal entities, the interests of the state in civil proceedings. The purpose of the article is to study how to implement international standards for determining an efficient civil law remedy by the court: (based on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and national case law). Clarification of the essence of novels of substantive and procedural law in determining the court's effective way to protect private law as the final judicial procedure of the right to judicial protection was by comparative law, methods of analysis, modelling and synthesis with the implementation of related elements of classical methods of protection and reception of the best acquisitions of legal systems of foreign countries, norms of the Convention of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (from now on – ECtHR). The dialectical method of cognition and the qualitative empirical method were also the main ones, by means of which the legal nature of the category "efficiency" and "determination by the court of an effective way of protection of private law and interest" were clarified.
References
A separate opinion of the judges of the Supreme Court of March. 2018 (http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73054753/).
Adamo, Silvia. 2016. “Protecting International Civil Rights in a National Context: Danish Law And its Discontents”. Nordic Journal of International Law 85(2):119-145. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08502004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08502004
Baliuk, Iryna and Olga Namiasenko. 2019. “Issues of Commercial Jurisdiction in the Context of Courts Specialization in Ukraine”. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 10(3):703-710. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.3(41).02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.3(41).02
Case of Afanasyev v. Ukraine. 2005 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/980_239#Text).
Case of Andrievska v Ukraine. 2011 (https://cna.court.gov.ua/ sud2590/2536/233223/5434).
Case of Atanasovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 2010 (http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96673). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451952773.002
Case of Bellet v. France. 1995 (https://cutt.ly/HhkSton).
Case of Bezymyannaya v. Russia. 2009 http://www.consultant. ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=156344#0617776702511907
Case of Bulanov v. Ukraine. 2010 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/974_664#Text).
Case of Burmych and others v. Ukraine. 2017 (http://hudoc.echr.coe. int/eng?i=001-178082).
Case of Chahal v. the United Kingdom. 1996 (http://search. ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SOO00780.html).
Case of Church of the village Sosulivka v Ukraine. 2008 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_350#Text).
Case of Garnaga v. Ukraine. 2013 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/974_960#Text).
Case of Gurepka v. Ukraine. 2005 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/980_437#Text).
Case of Kudla v. Poland. 2000 (https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/ SO2373).
Case of Leo ZAND v. Austria. 1978 (https://cutt.ly/3hkAfMV).
Case of Mosendz v. Ukraine. 2013 (https://cna.court.gov.ua/ sud2590/2536/233223/6451/).
Case of Nataliya Mikhaylenko v. Ukraine. 2013 (http://hudoc.echr. coe.int/eng?i=001-119975).
Case of Rysovskyy v. Ukraine. 2011 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/974_854).
Case of Shestopalova v. Ukraine. 2017 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/974_c61#Text).
Case of Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine. 2006 (https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/974_115#Text).
Case of Yuriy Mykolayovych Ivanov v. Ukraine. 2009. (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_479#Text).
Chornous, Yuliia, Volkova, Nataliia, Zghama, Antonina, Tsal-Tsalko, Yuliia, Tsybulska, Olha. 2019. “Res Judicata in Civil, Economic and Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine”. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 10(3):753-761. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.3(41).08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.3(41).08
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_ 004).
European and international standards in the field of justice. 2015. Kyiv: LLC “Yuston Publishing House”.
Fomina, Ludmila. 2016. “Protection of the Right to Respect for Private and Family Life in European Court of Human Rights”. European Research Studies Journal 19(3):97-110. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/566
Gau, Jacinta. 2016. “A Jury of Whose Peers? the Impact of Selection Procedures on Racial Composition and the Prevalence of Majority-White Juries”. Journal of Crime and Justice 39(1):75-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1087149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1087149
Guide to good practice on national remedies: adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. 2013 (https://rm.coe.int/k-/1680695aab).
International Pact on Civil and Political Rights. 1966 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043).
Jung, Simon. 2015. “Determining Criminal Responsibility: how Relevant are Insight and Personal Attitudes to Mock Jurors?” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 42-43:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.005
Law of Ukraine “About execution of decisions and application case law of the European Court of Human Rights”. 2006 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text).
Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts”. 2017 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/2147-19).
Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine Concerning Justice”. 2016 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1401-19#Text).
Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges”. 2016 (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text).
Lipinsky, Dmitry, Bolgova, Victoria, Musatkina, Aleksandra. 2019. “On the Compliance of Civil Standards of the Russian Federation with International Standards in the Field of the Fight Against Corruption”. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 57:553-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_58
Malevanov, Evgeniy, Novoselova, Svetlana, Bolotina, Tatyana, Pevtsova, Elena, Tikhonov, Alexander. 2016. “Civil-Law Education: Foreign and Russian Experience”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6(2):253-257.
Manual on Article 6 “Right to a Fair Trial” (civil part). 2013 (https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_UKR.pdf).
Milano, Valentina. 2017. “The European Court of Human Rights' Case Law on Human Trafficking in Light of L.E. v Greece: a Disturbing Setback?” Human Rights Law Review 17(4):701-727. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx031
Morozov, Evhen. 2018. “The Right to an Effective Remedy in the Short Stories of CASU” (https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/113808-pravo-na-efektivniy-zasib-yuridichnogo-zakhistu-v-novelakh-kasu).
Novitsky, Vladislav. 2018. “The Guarantees of Human Rights and Freedoms in the European Union: the Experience for Ukraine”. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(7):2397-2402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).25
Potapenko, Andrii. 2019. “An Effective Remedy: the Civil Aspect of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights”. Transcarpathian of Legal Readings:350-359.
Potapenko, Andrii. 2020. “Resolution of Jurisdictional Conflicts in Order to Implement Effective Justice: the Impact of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights”. Implementation of International Standards in Civil and Commercial Litigation of Ukraine: 102-108.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court in case No. 591/3999/17-ts. 2019 (http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/ 84788664).
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of March in the case №11-98ap18. 2018b. (http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/72850795).
Smolkova, Iraida, Maziuk, Roman. 2016. “Legal, Illegal and Procedural Interests of the Accused Person in Russian Criminal Procedure”. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law 10(1):156-169. https://doi.org/10.17150/1996-7756.2016.10(1).156-169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17150/1996-7756.2016.10(1).156-169
Smolkova, Iraida, Tatyana Vilkova, Roman Maziuk, Sergei Nasonov, and Andrei Nichiporenko. 2018. “Prospects of Improving the Mechanism of Judicial Protection in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Issues of Theory and Practice”. Russian Journal of Criminology 12(3):387-395. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(3).387-395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(3).387-395
Tague, Peter. 2008. “Guilty Pleas or Trials: Which Does the Barrister Prefer?” Melbourne University Law Review 32(1):39-50.
The decision of the Supreme Court in case №910/7661/17. 2019 (http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80211422).
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948 (https://www.coe.int/uk/ web/compass/the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights-full-version-).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
