Implications of Legal Positivism on Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia in the Case of the Hacking of the Mojokerto City Government Website

Authors

  • Sukirno Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto, Banyumas, and Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Semarang City, Pawiyatan Luhur Street, Bendan Dhuwur, Semarang City, Indonesia
  • Edy Lisdiyono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Semarang City, Indonesia; Pawiyatan Luhur Street, Bendan Dhuwur, Semarang City, Indonesia
  • Sri Mulyani Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Semarang City, Indonesia; Pawiyatan Luhur Street, Bendan Dhuwur, Semarang City, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.105

Keywords:

Legal Positivism, Law Enforcement, Cybercrime, Hacking, Mojokerto City.

Abstract

The existence of legal positivism that prioritizes legal certainty is expected to resolve various cybercrime criminal cases. One of them happened in the case of the Mojokerto City Government site hacking. The case has troubled the community, especially the city government of Mojokerto. The research method uses normative juridical research with a legal approach, concepts and collects primary legal materials in hacking rules and information technology in cybercrime crime. The study results found that the existence of legal positivism in the crime of cybercrime positions the law as statutory regulation and law as an order containing sanctions. In-Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions contains orders and prohibited actions. The actions taken by the suspect are deemed unfair if there are no sanctions or punishments because, according to legal positivism, justice that is legality (statutory regulation) is justice that prioritizes legal certainty. The law in force in article 46 paragraph 3 of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions must be imposed on the suspect in the Mojokerto City government website hacking case.

References

Antoni. (2017). Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cyber Crime) Dalam Simak Online. Nurani, 17 (2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1192

Arief, B. N. (2001). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dan Masalah Jurisdiksi Tindak Pidana Mayantara. Semarang: Kerjasama Dirjen Postel DEPHUB dengan UNDIP.

Arief, B. N. (2007). Tindak Pidana Mayantara, Perkembangan Kajian Cyber Crime di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arief, B. N. (2011). Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan dan Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Pustaka Magister.

Asshidiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Azad, M. M., Mazid, K. N., & Sharmin, S. S. (2017). Cyber Crime Problem Areas, Legal Areas and the Cyber Crime Law. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 3 (5), 1-6.

Choi, K. S., & Lee, C. S. (2018). The Present And Future Of Cybercrime, Cyberterrorism, And Cybersecurity. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence and Cybercrime, 1 (1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52306/2578-3289.1008

Imaniyati, N. S. (2003). Pengaruh Paradigma Positivisme Terhadap Teori Hukum Dan Perkembangannya. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosia da Pembangunan, XIX (3), 268.

Maskun. (2013). Kejahatan Siber;Cybercrime Suatu Pengantar. Makasar: Kencana.

Noho, M. D. (2019). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Build Operate Transfer (BOT) Di Indonesia: Di Masa Lalu, Saat Ini, Dan Akan Datang. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3 (1), 90. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.35

Prasetyo, T., & Barkatullah, A. H. (2016). Filsafat, Teori, & Ilmu Hukum Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Simaremare, S. P., & Noho, M. D. (2021). Disharmonized the Regulation of Biological Resources and its Ecosystem in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.41

Siregar, B. J. (2018). Problem Dan Pengaturan Cybercrime Melalui Aktifitas Internet Dalam Kasus Saradi Pilkada Serentak 2018. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 3 (1), 330-336. https://doi.org/10.32696/jp2sh.v3i1.96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32696/jp2sh.v3i1.96

Sitompul, A. (2001). Hukum Internet: Pengenalan Mengenai Masalah Hukum di Cyberspace. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Syamsudin, A. (2011). Tindak Pidana Khusus. Jakarta: PT Sinar Grafika.

Tobing, R. L. (2010). Jurnal Akhir Penelitian Hukum Tentang Efektifitas Undang – Undang No. 11 tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: BPHN.

Yusriadi. (2018). Positivisme Hukum. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-26

How to Cite

Sukirno, Lisdiyono, E. ., & Mulyani, S. . (2021). Implications of Legal Positivism on Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia in the Case of the Hacking of the Mojokerto City Government Website. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 891–896. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.105

Issue

Section

Articles