The Effectiveness of Gratification Arrangements as Part of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia: A Theoretical Study in Talcott Parsons Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.107Keywords:
Gratification, Corruption Crime, Talcott Parson, Cybernetics Theory, Indonesia.Abstract
This research aims to examine the crime of gratification as part of the criminal act of corruption, which will be seen in Talcott Parson's perspective. Corruption today is a problem for developing countries and has become a world problem that requires integral and transnational handling. One of the most disclosed forms of corruption today is corruption in the form of gratuities. This research method uses normative juridical research with the approach of laws, concepts, and principles and collects primary legal material in the form of Law 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The results of this study found that the Cybernetics Theory, which Talcott Parsons coined, views the problem of alleged gratification as being strongly influenced by the economic sub-system, this is because a decision that is made has a significant impact on anyone, so it is not surprising if there is a lot of price bargaining. Moreover, the least impact is the cultural sub-system because this sub-system is only the economic sub-system's impact.
References
Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana .
Azhari, F. (2016). Dynamics of Social Change and Islamic Law. Al-Tahrir, 16 (1), 210-211. https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v16i1.322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v16i1.322
Bethesda, E. (2019). Masyarakt Memandang Gratifkasi Dalam Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 5 (2), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18311
Friedman, L. (1975). The Legal System: Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Hafrida. (2013). Juridical Analysis of Gratuities and Bribery as Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 31 Year 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning The Eradication Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption. Inovatif, 6 (7), 1-2.
Hidayat, A. (2006). Kebebasan Berserikat Di Indonesia (Suatu Analisa Pengaruh Perubahan Sistem Politik Terhadap Penafsiran Hukum). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
K, A. T. (2015). Reflection on the Revitalization of Pancasila Values as Ideology in Eliminating Corruption Crimes. Universum, 9 (1), 49.
Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2015). Perbandngan Hukum Kontrak (Comparative Contract Law). Bandung : CV Bandar Maju.
Mauliddar, N., Din, M., & Rinaldi, Y. (2017). The Gratification As Corruption In Regard With A Report From A Gratification Receiver. Kanun Journal of Legal Studies, 19 (1), 74-75.
Noho, M. D. (2019). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Build Operate Transfer (BOT) Di Indonesia: Di Masa Lalu, Saat Ini, Dan Akan Datang. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3 (1), 90. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.35
Parsons, T. (1990). Talcot Parsons Dan Pemikirannya, Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya.
Pasaribu, R. B. (2013). Manusia dan Pandangan Hidup. Ilmu Budaya Dasar, 264.
Rahardjo, S. (1979). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.
Setiawan, K. U. (2020). Efforts to Apply the Noble Values of Pancasila During and After the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Theology and Christian Education, 2 (3), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.19166/dil.v2i3.2421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19166/dil.v2i3.2421
Simaremare, S. P., & Noho, M. D. (2021). Disharmonized the Regulation of Biological Resources and its Ecosystem in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.41
Sina, L. (2008). Impacts and Efforts to Eradicate Corruption and Control of Corruption in Indonesia. Pro Justitia Legal Journal, 26 (1), 43.
Surbakti, N. (2006). Implementasi Kebijakan Berwawasan Gender Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9 (2), 205.
Suteki. (2015). Masa Depan Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Thafamedia.
Syafira, N. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Menerima Gratifikasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. JOM Fakultas Hukum, II (2), 2.
Yulistyowati, E., & Pujiastuti, E. (2016). Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia : Studi Komparatif Atas Undang–Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Sebelum dan Sesudah Amandemen. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 18 (2), 330. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v18i2.580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v18i2.580
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
