Digitalization Trends in Education and Blended Learning

Authors

  • Andrew V. Danilov Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communications, Kazan Federal University, Russia
  • Inna D. Nekrasova Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communications, Kazan Federal University, Russia
  • Nnamdi Anyameluhor Department of Computing and Technology, Nottingham Trent University (Great Britain), Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.121

Keywords:

Visualization, blended learning,, e-learning, digital education

Abstract

The article under review actualizes the problem of using digital computer technologies in the process of blended learning. The notion of «blended learning» is determined and specified according to various sources. Various models and ways of organizing this kind of work as an alternative to the standard form of learning are presented. The article presents a positive experience of using blended learning technology. Much attention is paid to visualization as one of the teaching tools to create educational materials for blended learning. The synthesis of verbal materials (especially spoken) and visual elements (pictures, graphic notes, animations, films, plots, and diagrams, etc.) within the limits of one text is an instrument to optimize the process of semantic perception and understanding text information. All the benefits of this modern technology allow students to establish a holistic adoption of this model and a positive direction for the development of blended learning as an innovative teaching technology

References

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.

Batrova, N. I., Lukoyanova, M. A., Salekhova, L., & Çavuşoğlu, G. (2018). Booktrailer como medio de formar la competencia discursiva de los estudiantes. Orbis: revista de Ciencias Humanas, 14(41), 223-231.

Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons.

Bochina, T., Ageeva, J., & Vlasicheva, V. (2014). Multimedia presentation as a strategy of teaching speaking. In INTED2014. Proceedings 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference March 10th-12th, pp. 7661-7669.

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.

Learning, D. 2014. Models of blended learning. Pridobljeno, 17(12),6-12. https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp2014.02.17.1.12.s12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.17.10.12.s12

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17

Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 12(2), 88-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.0088

Varlamova, M. Y., Bochina, T. G., & Zharkynbekova, S. K. (2017). Courses of open education in the system of foreign language teaching. Revista QUID, (1), 2502-2507.

Web-developing” online course, 2020. URL:.php?id=3499 https://do.kpfu.ru/course/view

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

V. Danilov, A. ., D. Nekrasova, . I. ., & Anyameluhor, N. . (2022). Digitalization Trends in Education and Blended Learning. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1062–1066. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.121

Issue

Section

Conference Proceeding Articles 2020