Non-Authentic Property Declaring as a Qualifying Feature of a Corruption Offense: The Experience of Eu Countries

Authors

  • Mykhailo O. Akimov National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Andrii V. Kholostenko Odessa State University of Internal Affairs, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Iryna M. Yavorska Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Olena V. Dragan University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Irpin, Ukraine
  • Stepan V. Burak Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.181

Keywords:

Declaration of property, declarant, non-authentic information, corruption offences, anti-corruption method.

Abstract

Declaring property is a method of fighting and preventing corruption. Making it mandatory to provide information about the property causes a number of problems that are related to the inaccuracy of the declaration information. European Union (EU) countries have different approaches to providing information and property information. Significant differences in the requirements for declaring income and assets were revealed. It was done on the basis of the data analysis. The systems of declaration and verification of information on the property of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries were studied in this work. The difference in the procedures of verification of authenticity and establishment of responsibility in case of detection of violation is determined. It is determined that smaller sanctions have been imposed in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe with a higher level of corruption. Sanctions mainly relate to the imposition of fines. In Greece, penalties for administrative fines vary considerably in the number of fines and, in some cases, it might be imprisonment for up to 10 years. The system of verification of declarations also varies significantly within Central and Eastern Europe: from verification of declarations, in particular randomly or automatically, the usage of risk assessment methodology for inaccurate information of the declarant to the notification of unjustified amount of property. It is determined that the inspection takes place as a result of bringing a person to justice in 6 countries.

References

Aigbokhan, President. 2014. “Code of conduct tribunal proceedings and other related constitutional issues”. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 3: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.5897/JLCR2013.0168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JLCR2013.0168

Asset Declarations in CEE Countries. 2017. Data comparison between countries. Retrieved June 8, 2020 (http://assetdeclarations.transparencee.org/compare).

Ayinde, Dare. 2019. “An assessment of assets declaration by public officers as an anti-corruption measure in Nigeria”. University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, 69 p.

Bolleyer, Nicole, Valeria Smirnova, Fabrizio Di Mascio and Alessandro Natalini. 2020. “Conflict of interest regulation in European parliaments: Studying the evolution of complex regulatory regimes”. Regulation & Governance 14: 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12221

Brun, Jean-Pierre. 2011. “Assets recovery handbook: A guide for practitioner”. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 145 p.

Bukovansky, Mlada. 2006. “The hollowness of anti-corruption discourse”. Review of International Political Economy 13(2): 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290600625413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290600625413

Criminal Code of Moldova, No 985-XV. 2002. Retrieved June 10, 2020 (http://www.base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx? rgn=3835#A000000435).

Criminal Code of Ukraine, No 2341-III. 2001. Retrieved June 8, 2020 (http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14/paran3155# n3155).

Duri, Jorum. 2016. “Assets declarations by public officers in Zimbabwe as an anti-corruption tool”. University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, 64 p.

Greece Legislation. 2003. Law 3213/2003 “On Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals”. Retrieved June 15, 2020 (http://europam.eu/?module=legislation&country=Greece)

Habershon, Alexandra and Stephanie Trapnell. 2012. “Public office private interest: Accountability through income and asset disclosure”. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 123 p.

Hoppe, Tilman and Valts Kalnins. 2014. “Practitioner manual on processing and analysing income and asset declarations of public officials”. Retrieved June 4, 2020 (http://tilman-hoppe.de/CoE_Practitioner_manual_on_analysing_declarations-EN.pdf).

Kotlyar, Dmytro and Laura Pop. 2019. “E-filing asset declarations: Benefits and challenges”. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 85 p. https://doi.org/10.1596/32066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/32066

Marquette, Heather. 2001. “Corruption, democracy and the World Bank”. Crime, Law and Social Change 36(4): 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012045700314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012045700314

McCoy, Jennifer and Heather Heckel. 2001. “The emergence of a global anti-corruption norm”. International Politics 38: 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8892613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8892613

OECD. 2003. “Greece-OECD project: Technical support on anti-corruption”. Retrieved June 2, 2020 (https://www.oecd.org/ governance/ethics/technical-report-asset-declarations-greece-en.pdf).

OECD. 2011. “Asset declarations for public officials: A tool to prevent corruption”. Retrieved June 11, 2020 (https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/asset-declarations-for-public-officials_9789264095281-en).

Roberts, Alasdair. 2003. “Three patterns in the diffusion of transparency rules: money, guns and human rights”. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1439722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1439722

Rossi, Ivana, Laura Pop and Tammar Berger. 2017. “Getting full picture on public officials how – to guide for effective financial disclosure”. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 219 p. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0953-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0953-8

Schnell, Sabina. 2015. “Mimicry, persuasion, or learning? The case of two transparency and anti-corruption policies in Romania”. Public Administration and Development 35(4): 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1721

Starodub, Dmytro. 2016. “Anti-corruption declaration: comparative legal analysis of Ukraine and the CIS countries”. Legea şi Viaţa 299(11/2): 103-107.

The World Bank. 2016. “Asset declarations: A threat to privacy or a powerful anti-corruption tool?” Retrieved June 19, 2020 (https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2016/09/26/asset-declarations-a-threat-to-privacy-or-a-powerful-anti-corruption-tool).

The World Bank. 2020. “Corruption statistics”. Retrieved June 16, 2020 (https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/data/ exploretopics/corruption).

Tulu, Diriba. 2020. “The role of asset disclosure and registration law in combating corruption in Ethiopia: A comparative analysis with the Hong Kong and Rwanda legal systems”. JL Pol’y & Globalization 95: 7-13.

Wang, Hongying. and James Rosenau. 2001. “Transparency international and corruption as an issue of global governance”. Global Governance 7(1): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00701005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00701005

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Akimov, M. O. ., Kholostenko, A. V. ., Yavorska, I. M. ., Dragan, O. V. ., & Burak, S. V. . (2022). Non-Authentic Property Declaring as a Qualifying Feature of a Corruption Offense: The Experience of Eu Countries. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.181

Issue

Section

Articles