Frame "Social Activities to Achieve the Goal": Formation and Specifics of Its Representation at Language Level

Authors

  • Vita A. Kuzmicheva Department of English Philology and Cross–Cultural Communication Belgorod National State Research University, Russia
  • Olga N. Prokhorova Department of English Philology and Cross–Cultural Communication Belgorod National State Research University, Russia
  • Olga V. Dekhnich Department of English Philology and Cross–Cultural Communication Belgorod National State Research University, Russia
  • Vladimir S. Pugach Department of English Philology and Cross–Cultural Communication Belgorod National State Research University, Russia
  • Irina M. Chebotareva Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature Belgorod National State Research University, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.221

Keywords:

Organized transnational crime, international cooperation, national legislation, transnational criminal organizations, crime, prevention.

Abstract

The proposed article is devoted to describing the specifics of the frame formation "social activity to achieve the goal" represented by the verbal tokens (achieve, accomplish, attain, gain, succeed in, obtain, manage, strive, etc.) with the corresponding meaning and revealing the dependence of the modification of their meaning on the intrasystem and extra system restructuring of the proper frame.

References

Bradford B. T. 1988. Act of Will. London,– 526 p.

Cognitive Science. 1989. – Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: A Bradford Book,– 533 p.

Conran S H. 1995. Tiger Eyes. London,– 442 p.

Croft W., Cruse D. A. Cognitive Semantics and Scientific Knowledge. – Cambridge University Press, 2004. – 356 p.

Cruse D. A. 1990. Prototype theory and lexical semantics // Studies in linguistic categorization / Ed. By Tsohatzidis S. L. – London, New York,– P. 382– 402.

Fillmore C. H., Atkins B. 1992. Towards a frame–based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. // Frames, Fields and Contrasts. – N. Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,– P. 27–64.

Hornby A. S. 1982. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. Oxford,– 1036 p.

Johnson C., Fillmore C.H. 2000. The FrameNet tagset for frame–semantic and syntactic coding of predicate–argument structure. // The Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ANLP–NAACL 2000), April 29–May 4, Seattle WA,– P. 56–62.

Keller H. 1974. The Story of My Life. New York,– 416 p.

Kertẻsc A. Cognitive Semantics and Scientific Knowledge. – Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2004. – 259 p. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.4

Lowe J., Baker C., Fillmore Ch. 1997. A frame–semantic approach to semantic annotation. // Proceedings of the SIGLEX workshop "Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics: Why, What, and How?" April 4–5, – Washington, D.C., USA in conjunction with ANL,– P. 56 – 97.

Minsky M. A 1980. framework for representing knowledge // Frame conception and text understanding / ed. by D. Metzing. Vol. 5. – Berlin, New York: Gruyter,– P. 1– 25. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858778-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858778-003

Orwell G. 1984. New York, 2007. – 270 p.

Petruck M. 1994. Frame semantics and the lexicon: nouns and verbs in the body frame. // Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. by M. Shibatani and S. Thompson, – Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1995. – P. 279 – 296. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.32.14pet DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.32.14pet

Stoker B. Dracula. – London: Penguin Books,– 450 p.

Willks Y. A. 1980. Frames, Semantics and Novelty // Frame Conceptions and Text Understanding / ed. by D. Metzing. Vol. 5. – Berlin, New York: Gruyter,– P. 134 – 162 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858778-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858778-010

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Kuzmicheva, V. A. ., Prokhorova, O. N. ., Dekhnich, O. V. ., Pugach, V. S. ., & Chebotareva, I. M. . (2022). Frame "Social Activities to Achieve the Goal": Formation and Specifics of Its Representation at Language Level. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1906–1911. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.221

Issue

Section

Articles