“Correlation is the Truth of all Existence,” or Interdisciplinarity as a Methodological Principle of Adequate Social Cognition

Authors

  • Fanil Fagimovich Serebryakov Kazan Federal University, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.286

Keywords:

Interdisciplinary, Social Knowledge, Social Philosophy, Scientific Cognition, Subject (Thing).

Abstract

The article demonstrates that interdisciplinarity is not only a characteristic of the modern stage of scientific knowledge, as it is usually stated. Nevertheless, it is a methodological expression of the ambiguous nature of knowledge about any social subject, which makes us consider it as a requirement for adequate social knowledge. This nature of knowledge about a social subject stems from the fact that every existing thing (including a social one), always, “by nature” in relations with other things, discovers that it is itself (“the truth of its existence”), only through this relationship, only through another thing, only in interaction with it. We can call this the nature of a thing; the way it exists. Moreover, if all the definitions of a thing, all knowledge about a thing that arises specifically, as a result of its various relationships with other things, are essential for its understanding and cannot be ignored when defining a thing. Then an adequate knowledge of such a thing (social things) will always be only its knowledge as the dialectical unity of many definitions. This implies that the external expression of this fact is interdisciplinarity as a methodological principle of adequate knowledge. That is, adequate knowledge of a thing (which is always multifaceted) is possible only through the interaction of the potential of separate, historically developed systems of concepts that correspond to these faces and form separate social disciplines, i.e. only as interdisciplinary knowledge.

References

Alan L. P., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time, Scientometrics, 81(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2

Andrés-Gallego J. (2015), "Are Humanism and Mixed Methods Related? Leibniz's Universal (Chinese) Dream". Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 29(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813515332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813515332

Ausburg, T. (2006). Becoming Interdisciplinary: An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies (2nd ed.). New York: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.

Bauer, H.H. (2012). Three Stages of Modern Science. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 27(3), LicenseCC BY-NC.

Buzeskul, V.P. (2005). An introduction to the history of Greece. A review of sources and an outline of the development of Greek history in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Saint-Petersburg, P.432.

Cherniss, H. (1964). Aristotle’s Criticismof Presocratic Philosophy (1935). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, New York: Octagon Books.

Dodds, E.R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational, Sather Classical Lectures, 25, Berkeley and Los Angeles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520931275

Gelsdorf, K. (2010). Global Challenges and their Impact on International Humanitarian Action, Policy Development and Studies Branch, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Gunn, G. (1992), "Interdisciplinary Studies". In Gibaldi, J. (ed.). Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Language and Literatures. New York: Modern Language Association. pp. 239–240. ISBN 978-0873523851.

Guthrie, W.K. (1962). A history of Greek Philosophy, vol:1, The Earlier Pre-Socratic and the Pythagoreans, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal, 21-26.

Hegel, V.F. (2010). Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline.Part one: Science of Logic. New York. Cambridge University Press, P.303, (§135)

Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W. (2018). Social Media Writing and Social Class: A Correlational Analysis of Adolescent CMC and Social Background. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 6(2), 73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil

Hisham, M.A. (2018). Bourdieu and Genette in Paratext: How Sociology Counts in Linguistic Reasoning. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 6(2), 90-101.

Ignaciuk A., Rice M., Bogardi J., GCanadell J., Dhakal S., Ingram J., Leemans R., & Rosenberg M. (2012). Responding to complex societal challenges: A decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) interdisciplinary research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.12.003

Interdisciplinarity in the Modern Humanities and Social Sciences (2016). proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference (Rostov-On-Don,22-23 June 2016)/Southern Federal University. P.2: Sectional Reports. - Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of Southern Federal University, – 684.

Kasavin, I.T. (2004). The Idea of Interdisciplinary. Epistemology& Philosophy of Science, 2(2), 14.

Klein, J.T (1990), Interdisciplinary: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University.

Lorenzo, M.N., Ramos A.M., & Brands, S. (2015). Present and future climate conditions for winegrowing in Spain. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0883-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0883-1

Okafor E.E. (2007), Globalization, Changes and Strategies for Managing Workers, Resistance in Work Organizations in Nigeria, Journal of human ecology (Delhi, India) 22(2), Department of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2007.11906016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2007.11906016

Origgi, G., & Sperber, D. (2000). Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. P/Carruthers, A/Cahmberlain (eds). Evolution and the Human Mind. Gambridge, 140-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611926.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611926.008

Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. Interdisciplinarity, Problems of teaching and research in universities. P.

Razmak, J., & Bélanger, C. H. (2016). Interdisciplinary Approach: A Lever to Business Innovation. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p173

Ruiz-Villanueva, V., Stoffel, M., Wyżga, B., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Czajka, B., & Niedźwiedź, T. (2014). Decadal variability of floods in the northern foreland of the Tatra Mountains. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0694-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0694-9

Schläppy, R., Jomelli, V., Eckert, N., Stoffel, M., Grancher, D., Brunstein, D., Corona, C., & Deschatres, M. (2015). Can we infer avalanche–climate relations using tree-ring data? Case studies in the French Alps. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0823-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0823-0

Scholz, R.W. (2011). Environmental literacy in science and society: From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921520

Scoccimarro, E., Gualdi, S., Bellucci, A., Zampieri, M., & Navarra, A. (2014). Heavy precipitation events over the Euro-Mediterranean region in a warmer climate: results from CMIP5 models. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0712-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0712-y

Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects. (2015).

Zhmud, L.Y. (2015). William Guthrie and his History of Greek Philosophy.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Serebryakov, F. F. . (2022). “Correlation is the Truth of all Existence,” or Interdisciplinarity as a Methodological Principle of Adequate Social Cognition. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2368–2375. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.286

Issue

Section

Articles