Mythical Cognition and Artistic Method

Authors

  • Zhazira Kokbas Department of Kazakh Literature, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zhanat Aimukhambet Department of Kazakh Literature, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Karlygash Kurmambayeva Department of Kazakh Literature, Shakarim State University of Semey, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Nurgul Smagulova Department of Kazakh Philology, Sh. Ualikhanov Kokshetau State University, Kokshetau, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Mendykyz Yesmatova Department of the Kazakh Language and Literature, M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan State University, Petropavlovsk, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.386

Keywords:

Mythical aspects, author’s work, mythopoetics, poetry, symbol, image.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to research mythical cognition, which is of particular importance for deep understanding of the issue of mythologism, mythopoetics in literature, and world literary science. The leading research methods for this issue is the analysis method. The specifics of using the mythopoetic method in poetry was given by the poetry of Tynyshtykbek Abdikakimov, the artistic and aesthetic value of mythical knowledge was revealed. The article also analyses the differences between mythological and poetic cognition and proves the value and power of the mythopoetic method in fiction. The system of mythological thinking of a mythological worldview not only determines Kazakh national worldview, but also transfers the fruits of mythical consciousness to the visual system, forming a huge channel of artistic approach. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that the actual problem of literary criticism was analysed, which is a spiritual value, the transformation of mythological consciousness into poetic consciousness in the poems of the poet, into the basis of images and poetic expressions formed in the system of modern literary thinking. The practical significance of the study is determined by the necessity to study the activity of mythical knowledge in poetics.

References

Abdikakimov, Tynyshtykbek. 2013. Poems, Ballads. Astana: Foliant.

Aymuhambet, Zhanat A. 2010. The Activity of Myth in Poetry (At the Heart of Modern Kazakh Poetry). Almaty: Alma-Ata.

Aymuhambet, Zhanat A. 2017. Myth. Mythology. Mythopoetics. Almaty: Alma-Ata.

Buslaev, Fedor I. 1935. Historical Essays of Russian Folk Literature and Art. St. Petersburg: Edition of D.E. Kozhanchikova.

Eliade, Mircea. 2014. Aspects of the Myth. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt.

Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Critism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jung, Karl G. 1991. Archetype and Symbol. Moscow: Renaissance.

Maximov, Dmitry E. 1986. About the Mythopoetic Beginning in Blok’s Lyrics. Leningrad: Detskaya literatura.

Meletinsky, Eleazar M. 1976. The Poetics of Myth. Moscow: Nauka.

Potebnya, Alexandr A. 1989. Word and Myth. Moscow: Pravda.

Schelling, Friedrich I. 1996. The Philosophy of Art. Moscow: Mysl.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Kokbas, Z. ., Aimukhambet, Z. ., Kurmambayeva, K. ., Smagulova, N. ., & Yesmatova, M. . (2022). Mythical Cognition and Artistic Method. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 3198–3202. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.386

Issue

Section

Articles