Modelling Game as Socio-Psychological Paradigm for Resolving Ethno-National Conflicts

Authors

  • Vitalii I. Bocheliuk Department of Social Work and Psychology, “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic” National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Valentyna M. Zaytseva Institute of Management and Law, “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic” National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Eduard A. Gugnin Institute of Management and Law, “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic” National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Dmytro Yu. Arabadzhyiev Department of Common Law and Political Sciences, “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic” National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Vasyl M. Popovych Department of Social Work and Psychology, “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic” National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.347

Keywords:

Ethno-national conflicts, reasons, solution methods, paradigmatic principles, modelling game.

Abstract

The aim of this study was: (a) to evaluate the effectiveness of training to improve the intercultural behaviour of students; (b) to study and enrich their personal experience of resolving interethnic and international conflicts; and (c) to identify factors that contribute to the effective development of relevant skills that ensure social self-efficacy, reduce social avoidance, increase empathy and intercultural tolerance. The study used general scientific theoretical, empirical, experimental and statistical methods. To diagnose the dynamics of the studied variables – social self-efficacy, social avoidance, empathy, intercultural tolerance – “Scale of social self-efficacy of Fan and Mak”, “Situational scale of social avoidance”; checklists “Interpersonal skills”; “Basic scale for the diagnosis of empathy in adults”; diagnosis of the level of formation of intercultural tolerance were used. At the experimental stage of the study, a series of training based on modelling games (simulations) to resolve ethno-national conflicts was conducted. At the end of the training, a repeated diagnostic section of the dynamics of the above-mentioned variables and a semi-structured interview was conducted, which included 5 open-ended questions. The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of these variables in comparison with EG and CG groups revealed significant dynamics in the variables “social self-efficacy”, “empathy”, “intercultural tolerance” and minor changes in the variable “social avoidance”. The dynamics of the EG index was more significant. Respondents also praised the types of work such as working in groups, the model of providing feedback during game situations and presentations of student projects. The results of this study confirmed that the model based on simulation games (simulations) for resolving ethno-national conflicts was effective in improving social self-efficacy, empathy and intercultural tolerance and in lowering psychological barriers (social avoidance) of EG participants compared to CG individuals. Participants reported that this type of training allowed them to develop skills for future professional activities in a multicultural (poly-ethnic or poly-national) community.

References

Abdulatipov, Ramazan G. 2004. Ethnopolitics. Ethnos and States. Ethnopolitical Conflicts Are the Causes and Ways to Resolve Them. Saint Petersburg: Piter.

Arshba, Otari I. 2000. “Modern Concepts of “Management” of Ethnopolitical Conflict”. MSU Vestnik, Sociology and Political Science 1: 78–85.

Barbelko, Nataliya. 2015. “Diagnosis of the Level of Intercultural Tolerance in College Students”. Problems of Modern Teacher Preparation 11(1): 6–13.

Carré, Arnaud, Stefaniak, Nicolas, D'Ambrosio, Fanny, Bensalah Leïla and Chrystel Besche-Richard. 2013. “The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor Structure of a Revised Form”. Psychological Assessment 25(3): 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297

Dahl, Robert A. 1963. Modern Political Analyses. New York: Science.

Hirnyk, Oleksiy. 2003. Conflicts: Structure, Escalation, Solution. Kyiv: Solomiya Pavlychko Publishing House “BASICS”.

Hoperskaya, Larisa. 2009. “Ethnopolitical Conflict as a State of Ethnopolitical System”. Conflictology 1: 153–177.

Horowitz, Donald L. 1998. “Structure and Strategy in Ethnic Conflict”. Paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 20-21, Washington, USA.

Kotyhorenko, Viktor O. 2004. Ethnic Contradictions and Conflicts in Modern Ukraine: A Political Concept. Kyiv: Svitohlyad.

Kuts, Olena. 2003. “On the Question of the Prospects of the National State in the Context of Globalisation (Ethno-National Dimension)”. Vestnik of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Questions of Political Science 592: 272–281.

Lipset, Seymour M. 1985. Consensus and Conflict: Essays in Political Sociology. New Brunswick-Oxford: Transaction Books.

Makarenko, Eduard М. 2001. Spesifics of Managing Ethnic Conflicts in the Modern World. Retrieved June 27, 2020 (http://academy.gov.ua/ej/ej13/txts/Makarenko.pdf).

Mitchell, Christopher. 1989. The Structure of International Conflict. London: St. Martin’s Press.

Scannell, M. 2010. The Big Book of Conflict Resolution Games: Quick, Effective Activities to Improve Communication, Trust, and Collaboration. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Semeniv, Mary N. 2018. “Managing Ethnic Conflicts in Interethnic Relations: Features of Terminology and Methodology”. Young Scientist 10(62): 25–29.

Senyushkina, Tetiana O. 2005. Prevention and Solution of Ethnic Conflicts: Public Administration Dimension (Problems of Theory, Methodology, Practice). Odesa: ORIDU NADU.

Vavrynchuk, Mykola P. 2009. Ethnopolitical Security in the System of National Security of the Country at the Stage of Modern State Formation. Kyiv: Legal Unity.

Wong, Yuk Shuen. 2001. Evaluation of Sociocultural Competency Training in Enhancing Self-Efficacy among Immigrant and Canadian-born Health Sciences Trainees. The University of British Columbia. Retrieved June 27, 2020 (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a51/0b08b62311e96b18a197eb305ad9de2d19d8.pdf).

Yevtukh, Vladimir. 2009. Ethnicity: A Glossary. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Publishing House.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-21

How to Cite

Bocheliuk, V. I. ., Zaytseva, V. M. ., Gugnin, E. A. ., Arabadzhyiev, D. Y. ., & Popovych, V. M. . (2021). Modelling Game as Socio-Psychological Paradigm for Resolving Ethno-National Conflicts. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2834–2838. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.347

Issue

Section

Articles