Terms of Citizens 'Rights Restriction when Applying Measures of Criminal Procedure Forcing

E.A.  Askat; B.E.  Zhaksybayev; A.  Sakharbay; A.M.  Nurbeko; T.A.  Khanov

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.326

Authors

E.A. Askat Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after B. Beissenov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Ervekov st. 124
B.E. Zhaksybayev Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after B. Beissenov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Ervekov st. 124
A. Sakharbay Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after B. Beissenov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Ervekov st. 124
A.M. Nurbeko Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after B. Beissenov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Ervekov st. 124
T.A. Khanov Doctor of Juridical Science, Director, Department of Economic and Legal Research, Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Academicheskaya st. 9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.326

Keywords:

Criminal proceedings, Measures of criminal procedural coercion, Ensuring rights, The legitimate interests of the individual, Legal restrictions, Pre-trial investigation.

Abstract

The article considers the nature and purpose of measures of criminal procedure coercion. The authors highlighted the grounds for restricting constitutional rights and freedoms when using coercive means. The author’s definition of measures of criminal procedural coercion is formulated, which means: the preventive action applied by the authorities conducting the criminal process in the criminal case aimed at achieving the objectives of the pre-trial investigation and trial or ensuring proper conduct of the participants in the criminal process specified in the law, if any conditions and circumstances that necessitate the use of such an impact. The issues of legality and localization criteria of personal property and non-property subjective interests of citizens are raised. The analysis of the main classifications of measures of procedural coercion is carried out, and the author's approach to the classification of measures of procedural coercion is proposed, based on the conditions and the real need to limit the rights and legitimate interests of the person. Article materials can be of practical value for employees of investigative units conducting pre-trial investigations and encountering problems with the application of procedural coercive measures.

References

Akhpanov, A.N., Azarov, V.A. & Amirgaliev, A.A. (2014). Distribution and mechanism of judicial control in the pre-trial investigation stage: analysis of the draft Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Criminological journal of the Baikal State University of Economics and Law, no 1. 154-161.

Gulyaev, A. (2003). Pre-trial detention. Zakonnost’, no 4. 16.

Lupinskaya, P.A. (2003). Criminal Procedure Law of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Urist’.

Akhpanov, A., Shaykhadenov, R. & Sabitov, S. (2018). Criminal pre-trial proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan: trend of the institutional transformations. Opcion, no 85(34). 107-125.

Mikhailov, V.A. (2017). Certain Provisions on Measures of Criminal Procedure in the Republic of Tajikistan. Publichnoye i chastnoye pravo, no 2(34). 80-100.

Isabekov, A.A. (2017). Preventive measures in the system of measures of procedural coercion in the criminal proceedings of Kyrgyzstan. Aktual'nyye nauchnyye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire, no 10-3(30). 32-37.

Chistyakova, V.S. (1978). Legality and validity of the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion. Moscow: Urid.lit.

Kornukov, V.M. (1978). Coercive measures in criminal proceedings. Saratov: Sarat.nats.uni.

Kovriga, Z.F. (1975). Criminal Procedure. Voronezh: izd. Voronez. Uni.

Kudin, F.M. (1985). Coercion in criminal proceedings. Krasnoyarsk: Izdt. Krasnoyar.uni.

Grinenko, A.V. (2003). The validity of the detention and detention under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 9. 47-53.

Slobodenuk, O.U. (2010). Conditions of lawfulness of application of measures of criminal procedural coercion. Chelovek: prestupleniye i nakazaniye, no 4(65). 38-41.

Sadvakasova, A.T. & Khanov, T.A. (2017). Situations of the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings: Kazakhstani experience. Proceedings from International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the scientific school of forensic situational studies of the IKBFU I. Kant: Situational approach in legal science and practice: modern opportunities and development prospects. 90-95.

Khanov, T.A. & Kurenkeeva, I.Zh. (2015). Content and system of measures of criminal procedural coercion. Aktual'nyye problemy sovremennosti, no 4(10). 6-9.

Manivlets, E.E. (2017). Conditions and grounds for applying procedural coercive measures. Proceedings from International scientific and practical conference: Modern jurisprudence: current issues, achievements and innovations. 97-99.

Khapaev, I.M. (2014). General and special conditions for the election of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Urist’-Pravoved’, no 2(63). 85-88. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3073947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3073947

Rossinskiy, S.B. (2018). Legal conditions for the application of measures of criminal procedural restraint lead to haste and unfounded accusations. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, no 5. 30-36.

Tatarov, L.A. (2018). On measures of procedural coercion in the criminal process of the Russian Federation. Zako i pravo, no 7.112-114.

Petruhin, I.L. (1985). Personal freedom and criminal procedure coercion: Common concept. Personal integrity. Moscow: Nauka.

Filushchenko, A.A. (1974). Criminal Procedure. Izvestiya vuzov. Pravovedenie, no 3,5. Leningrrad: izd. Leningrad. Uni. 108-110.

Livshits, U.D. (1958). Measures of procedural coercion in the Soviet criminal process. Moscow.

Loganov, I.M. (1980). Personal freedom. Moscow: Mysl’.

Sarsenov, K.M. (1996). State coercion and its implementation in the activities of internal affairs bodies. St. Petersburg.

Bozh’ev, V.P. (2002). Criminal process. Moscow: SPARK.

Gulyaev, A. & Zaitsev, O. (2003). Pre-trial detention. Zakonnost’, no 4. 16.

Akhpanov, A.N. (1997). Problems of criminal procedural coercion in the preliminary investigation stage. Moscow.

Tkacheva, N.V. (2004). Preventive measures not related to detention in the criminal process of Russia. Chelyabinsk: UUrGU.

Mahdi, A.Dz. (2017). Guarantees of the legitimate interests of the individual when choosing measures of procedural coercion. Otechestvennaya yurisprudentsiya, no 7(21). 44-52.

Zhidkov, D.M. (2017). International legal guarantees of human rights and freedoms in the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion. Molodoi uchenyi, no 11. 342-345.

Vasileva, E.G. (2002). Problems of limiting the integrity of the person in criminal proceedings. Ufa.