The Influence of Delay and Item Difficulty in Criminal Justice Systems on Eyewitness Confidence and Accuracy

Authors

  • Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft University of Liverpool
  • Graham F. Wagstaff University of Liverpool
  • Brian Manarin Ministry of the Attorney General

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1655.2015.01.01

Keywords:

Criminal justice, delay, witness, confidence, accuracy

Abstract

There is international concern about the negative effects of delays in Criminal Justice Systems. Problems include the deleterious effects that delay can have on witnesses' memory accuracy and witnesses' ability to calibrate their memories accurately. Little empirical work has been conducted on these issues combined with item difficulty and the relationship between accuracy and confidence. This paper investigates these issues.

21 witnesses were interviewed about an observed crime and required to answer lawyerly questions used in cross-examination relating to target items classified as 'easy', 'moderate' and 'difficult', in terms of memorability. Participants were interviewed again, 6 months later. A 6 month delay significantly reduced memory accuracy for all levels of question difficulty. Within-subjects C-A relationships seemed to be relatively unaffected by delay; i.e. they tended to be positive for easy and moderate items, and negative for difficult items. Between-subjects C-A relationships were also positive for both easy and moderate items, but improved after 6 months; whereas C-A relationships for the difficult items remained negative and statistically insignificant following the 6 month delay. Delay can have a profound negative effect on witness accuracy that is not likely to be compensated for by improvements in C-A calibration.

Author Biographies

Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, University of Liverpool

Institute of Psychology, Health & Society

Graham F. Wagstaff, University of Liverpool

Institute of Psychology, Health & Society

References

Bothwell, R.K., Deffenbacher, K.A. and Brigham, J.C. 1987. “Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 7: 691-695.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.691
Brennan, M. 1995. “The discourse of denial: Cross-examining child victim witnesses. Special issue: Laying down the law: Discourse analysis of legal institutions.” Journal of Pragmatics, 23: 71-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00032-A
Brown, D. 2000. “Reducing delays in the Magistrates’ Court.” Home Office Research Findings, No. 131. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
Deffenbacher, K.A. 1980. “Eyewitness accuracy and confidence.” Law and Human Behaviour, 4: 243-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01040617
Ernst and Young Independent Consultants 1999. “Reducing delay in the Criminal Justice System: evaluation of the pilot schemes.” Home Office: London.
Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A. and Bull, R. 2011. “The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory.” British Journal of Psychology, 83(3): 323-336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02444.x
Fruzzetti, A.E., Toland, K., Teller, S.A. and Loftus, E.F. 1992. “Memory and eye witness testimony.” Pp. 18-50 in Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues, Vol. 1, edited by M.M. Gruneberg and P.E. Morris. London: Routledge.
Home Office 1999. “Listing arrangements for criminal cases in the Magistrates’ Courts: A draft protocol.” Located. www.cjsonline.org/legal/trials_issue_group.htm
Granhag, P.A. 1997. “Realism in eyewitness confidence as a function of type of event witnessed and repeated recall.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4): 599-613.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.599
Harris, S. 1984. “Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts.” International Journal of Society and Language, 49: 5-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.49
Hanna, K., Davies, E., Henderson, E., Crothers and Rotherham, C. 2010. “Child witnesses in the Criminal Courts: A Review of Practice and Implications for Policy.” Auckland: The New Zealand Law Foundation and Institute of Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology.
Hastie, R., Landsman, R. and Loftus, E.F. 1978. “Eyewitness testimony: The dangers of guessing.” Jurimetrics Journal, 19: 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/29761641
Hickey, L. 1993. “Presupposition under Cross-Examination.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1(16): 89-109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01458741
Jonides, J. Lewis, R.L., Nee, D.E., Lustig, C.A., Berman, M.G. and Moore, K.S. 2007. “The mind and brain of short term memory.” Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 193-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615
Keane, A. and Fortson, R. 2011. “Leading Questions: A critical analysis.” Criminal Law Review, 4: 280-295.
Kebbell, M.R., Deprez, S. and Wagstaff, G.F. 2003. “The direct and cross-examination of complainants and defendants in rape trials: A Quantitative Analysis of Question Type.” Psychology, Crime & Law, 9: 49-59.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10683160308139
Kebbell, M.R., Wagstaff, G.F. and Covey, A.C. 1996. “The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy.” British Journal of Psychology, 87: 653-662.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02614.x
La Rooy, D., Pipe, M.-E. and Murray, J.E. 2005. “Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children's eyewitness memory.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90: 235-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.002
Lindsay, D.S., Read, J.D. and Sharma, K. 1998. “Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely.” Psychological Science, 9: 215-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00041
Lipton, J.P. 1977. “On the psychology of eyewitness testimony.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 90-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.1.90
Loftus, E.F. 1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E.F. 2003. “Make-believe memories.” American Psychologist, 58: 867-873.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.867
Manarin, B. 2009. “Bedeviled by delay: Straight talk about memory loss, procedural manipulation, and the myth of swift justice.” Windsor Review of Legal and Social Justice, 27: 117-144.
Penrod, S., Loftus, E. and Winkler, J. 1982. “The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony: A Psychological Perspective.” Pp. 119-168 in The Psychology of the Courtroom, edited by N.L. Kerr. New York: Academic Press.
Perfect, T.J., Watson, E.L. and Wagstaff, G.F. 1993. “Accuracy of confidence ratings associated with general knowledge and eyewitness memory.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 144-147.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.144
Riddle, H. 2012. “The Stop Delaying Justice! Initiative.” The Law Gazette (19th January), accessed at http://www.lawgazette. co.uk/in-practice/practice-points/the-stop-delaying-justice-initiative
Ryan, R.H. and Geiselman, R.E. 1991. “Effects of biased information on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29: 7-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334752
Samuels, A. 1997. “Custody time limits.” Criminal Law Review: 260-268.
Smith, V.L., Kassin, S. and Ellsworth, P.E. 1989. “Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Within-versus between-subjects correlations.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 356-359.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.356
Sporer, S.L., Penrod, S.D., Read, D. and Culter, B.L. 1995. “Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: a meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies.” Psychological Bulletin, 118: 315-327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
Stone, M. 1988. “Cross-examination in Criminal Trials. ”London: Butterworths.
Taylor, S.C. 2004. Court licensed abuse: Patriarchal lore and the legal response to intra-familial sexual abuse of children. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Turtle, J.W. and Yuille, J.C. 1994. “Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hyperamnesia.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 260-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.260
Weingartner, H. and Parker, E.S. 1984. Memory consolidation: Psychobiology of cognition. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wells, G.L. 1985. “Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 619-626.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.619
Wells, G.L. 1993. “What do we know not about eyewitness identification?” American Psychologist, 48(5): 577-580.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.577
Wells, G.L. and Murray, M. 1984. “Eyewitness confidence.” Pp. 155-170 in Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives, edited by G.L. Wells and E.F. Loftus. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G.L., Lindsay, R.C.L. and Ferguson, T.J. 1979. “Accuracy, confidence and juror perceptions in eyewitness testimony.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 440-448.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.64.4.440
Wigmore, J.H. 1940. A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, Vol 5, 3rd Ed. Boston: Little Brown.
Wheatcroft, J.M. 2012. Judicial Processes. Pp. 229-246 inForensic Psychology: Crime, Justice, Law, Intervention, 2nd Edn, edited by G. Davies and A. Beech, (pp. 229-246). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Wheatcroft, J.M. and Ellison, L.E. 2012 “Evidence in Court: Witness preparation and cross-examination style effects on adult witness accuracy.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30: 821-840.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2031
Wheatcroft, J.M. and Woods, S. 2010. “Effectiveness of witness preparation and cross-examination non-directive and directive question styles on witness accuracy and confidence.” International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 14(3): 189-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2010.14.3.353
Wheatcroft, J.M., Caruso, D. and Krumrey-Quinn, J. (in press) Rethinking Leading: The directive, non-directive divide. Criminal Law Review, 5: 340-346.
Wheatcroft, J.M., Kebbell, M.R. and Wagstaff, G.F. 2001. “The influence of courtroom questioning style on eyewitness accuracy and confidence.” Forensic Update, 65: 20-25
Wheatcroft, J.M., Wagstaff, G.F. and Kebbell, M.R. 2004. “The influence of courtroom questioning style on actual and perceived eyewitness confidence and accuracy.” Legal & Criminological Psychology, 9: 83-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/135532504322776870200

Downloads

Published

2015-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles