Strengths and Dysfunctionalities of Formative Assessment: A Short Analysis from the Perspective of Romanian Education

Authors

  • Valerica Anghelache Teacher Training Department, “Dunrea de Jos” University of Galati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1655.2015.01.13

Keywords:

Evaluation, performance, objectivity, evaluative strategies, evaluative skills

Abstract

Evaluation reflects the educationalists' interest in understanding and improving the techniques and instruments of school assessment. Postmodern didactics brings forth a fresh perspective on the evaluation act, which is analysed not only as the final act of the instruction process, but also as a process meant to permanently adjust teaching and learning acts. The aim of this paper is to underline the evolution of evaluation theory and practice in Romanian education, emphasising both its benefits and drawbacks. The paper uses the extant research in the literature as well as personal knowledge of the author about the factors that are related to the improvement of didactic evaluation. Most of the results of these studies lead to the conclusion that building a culture of evaluation is necessary, that formative evaluation should valorise a wide range of strategies and docimologic tools in order to attain an objective evaluation, and to be able to employ its outcomes in designing the teaching-learning undertaking.

References

Bennet, R. E. 2011. “Formative assessment: A critical review”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18: 1, 5-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. 2009. “Developing the theory of formative assessment”, EducAsseEvalAcc, 21, 5-31. Retrieved from http://teacherscollegesj.edu/docs/47-developingthetheoryof-formativeassessment_12262012101200.pdf
Crundwell, R. M. 2005. “Alternative Strategies for Large Scale Student Assessment in Canada: Is Value-Added Assessment One Possible Answer”, Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 41. Retrieved from https://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/crundwell.html
Cuco?, C. 2008. Teoria ?i metodologia evalu?rii, Editura Polirom, Ia?i
Fook, C. Y. & Sidhu, G. K. 2010. “Authentic Assessment and Pedagogical Strategies in Higher Education”, Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (2), 153-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161
Gaytan, J. & McEwen, B. C. 2007. “Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies”, American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
Nyberg, E. & Olander, M. H. 2015. “A Study of Formative Assessment Strategies in Teachers‘ School-Based In-Service Training”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11 (1), 53-74
Perrenoud, Ph. 2004. “Évaluer des compétences”. L’Éducateur, n° spécial «La note en pleine évaluation », 8-11. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/fapse/SSE/teachers/perrenoud/php_main/php_2004/2004_01.html
Yaseen, O.S.B. 2013. “Educational Assessment Modern Strategies”. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (1)

Downloads

Published

2015-12-11

Issue

Section

Articles