Doctoral Education through the Lenses of the Bologna Process
Keywords:Higher Education, Bologna Process, Educational Policy, Doctoral Education
The agenda of Higher Educational institutions and other organisations reveals a growing concern with the extension and impact of research at the postgraduate level. Doctoral studies are thus acquiring a greater significance and value. The international and European context demonstrates the existence of an increasing number and a greater diversity of research students enrolling in postgraduate studies, particularly in doctoral programmes. Consequently, it is the purpose of this paper to examine doctoral education through the lenses of the Bologna Process. This perspective is chosen particularly due to the importance of Bologna at educational, political, economic, and social levels in Europe but also beyond. In fact, among other discourses, Bologna has been shaping the'trends' relating to doctoral education. Alongside with Bologna Ministerial documents, others from some consultative members (the so-called 'E4 group') are analysed. In the last section, some main challenges to doctoral education are highlighted.
Berlin Communiqué. 2003. Realising The European Higher Education Area. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/ documents/mdc/berlin_communique1.pdf).
Bologna Declaration. 1999. The Bologna Declaration Of 19 June 1999: Joint Declaration Of The European Ministers Of Education. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ond. vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/mdc/bologna_declaration1.pdf).
Bucharest Communiqué. 2012. Making The Most Of Our Potential: Consolidating The European Higher Education Area. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ehea.info/uploads/ (1)/bucharest%20communique%202012(1).pdf).
Christensen, Kirsti K. 2005. Bologna Seminar: Doctoral Programmes For The European Knowledge Society – General Rapporteur’s Report. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/Salzburg_Report_final.1129817011146.pdf).
ENQA - European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 2015. ENQA Report To Ministers Responsible For Higher Education In The EHEA. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ ENQA_report_Yerevan _2015.pdf).
ESU - The European Students’ Union. 2015a. Bologna With Student Eyes 2015: Time To Meet The Expectations From 1999. Brussels: ESU. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.esu-online.org/asset/News/6068/BWSE-2015-online.pdf).
ESU - The European Students’ Union. 2015b. European Students’ Union Statement To The Ministerial Conference. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://bologna-yerevan2015.ehea.info/ files/ESU%20Statement%20to%20Yerevan%20Ministerial%20Conference.pdf).
EUA. 2010. Salzburg Ii Recommendations. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publications_homepage_ list/Salzburg_II_Recommendations.sflb.ashx).
EURASHE - European Association of Institutions in Higher Education. 2015. Making European Professional Higher Education A Key Player In The Development Of A Fastly And Unpredictably Changing Society. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://bologna-yerevan2015.ehea.info/files/EURASHE_ Making%20European%20PHE%20a%20Key%20Player_Apr2015.pdf).
European Commission. 2011. Principles For Innovative Doctoral Training. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://ec.europa.eu/ euraxess/pdf/research_policies/Principles_for_Innovative_ Doctoral_Training.pdf).
Joint Quality Initiative Informal Group. 2003. Joint Quality Initiative Meeting: Summarizing Report. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.jointquality.org/).
Joint Quality Initiative Informal Group. 2004a. Report Of The Discussion Meeting: Towards An Overarching Framework Of European Higher Education Qualifications. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.jointquality.org/).
Joint Quality Initiative Informal Group. 2004b. Shared ‘Dublin’ Descriptors For Short Cycle, First Cycle, Second Cycle And Third Cycle Awards: A Report From A Joint Quality Initiative Informal Group. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.jointquality.org/).
Kehm, Barbara M. 2009. “New Forms Of Doctoral Education And Training In The European Higher Education Area.” Pp. 223-241 in The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives On A Moving Target, edited by B.M. Kehm, J. Huisman, and B. Stensaker. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué. 2009. The Bologna Process 2020 - The European Higher Education Area In The New Decade. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Declarations/Leuven_Louvain-la-Neuve_Communiqué_April_2009.pdf).
London Communiqué. 2007. Towards The European Higher Education Area: Responding To Challenges In A Globalised World. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ond. vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/mdc/london_communique18may2007.pdf).
Peters, Michael A. and Mark Olssen. 2005. “‘Useful knowledge’: Redefining Research and Teaching in the Learning Economy.” Pp. 37-47 in Reshaping The University: New Relationships Between Research, Scholarship And Teaching, edited by R. Barnett. Berkshire: Open University Press/SRHE.
Sursock, Andrée. (2015). Trends 2015: Learning And Teaching In European Universities. Brussels: European University Association. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/EUA_Trends_2015_web).
Yerevan Communiqué. 2015. Yerevan Communiqué. Retrieved December 10, 2015 (http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/ SubmitedFiles/5_2015/112705.pdf).
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.