How Should Journal Quality be Ranked?An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics

Authors

  • Chia-Lin Chang National Chung Hsing University
  • Michael McAleer Erasmus University Rotterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.05

Keywords:

Research assessment measures, Impact factor, IFI, C3PO, PI-BETA, STAR, Eigenfactor, Article Influence, h-index, harmonic mean of the ranks, age effect

Abstract

The Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (hereafter ISI) category of Economics has one of the largest numbers of journals, at 304 (as of 2011) and 333 (as of 2013), of any ISI discipline, and hence has wide coverage. The paper analyses the leading international journals in the Economics sub-disciplines of Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAMs),and highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAMs.The RAMs are based on alternative transformations of citations and influence taken from the ISI database. Alternative RAMs may be calculated annually or updated daily to answer the perennial questions as to When, Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited. The RAMs include the most widely used RAM, namely the classic 2-year impact factor including journal self citations (2YIF), 2-year impact factor excluding journal self citations (2YIF*), 5-year impact factor including journal self citations (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor, Article Influence, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), 2-year Self-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (2Y-STAR),HistoricalSelf-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (H-STAR), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). As data are not available for 5YIF, Article Influence and CAI for one of the 20 journals considered, 13 RAMsare analysed for 19 highly-cited journals in Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics in the ISI category of Economics. The harmonic mean of the ranksof the 13 RAMs for the 19 highly-cited journals are also presented. It is shown that emphasizing the 2-year impact factor of a journal, which partly answers the question as to When published papers are cited, to the exclusion of other informative RAMs, which answer Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited, can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal impact and influence relative to the harmonic mean of the ranks. The 'age' effect of journals, that is, the number of years for which the journals have been included in ISI, on the RAMs is also examined to check whether the RAMs are being compared fairly.

Author Biographies

Chia-Lin Chang, National Chung Hsing University

Department of Applied Economics and Department of Finance

Michael McAleer, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Department of Quantitative Finance, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Erasmus School of
Economics

References

Bergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316.
Bergstrom, C.T. and. J.D. West (2008), Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics, Neurology, 71, 1850–1851.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000338904.37585.66
Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5,).
Chang, C.-L., E. Maasoumi and M. McAleer (2013), Robust ranking of journal quality: An application to economics, to appear in Econometric Reviews.
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2012), Citations and impact of ISI tourism and hospitality journals, Tourism Management Perspectives, 1(1), 2-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2011.08.001
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013a), Ranking journal quality by harmonic mean of ranks: An application to ISI Statistics & Probability, Statistica Neerlandica, 67(1), 27-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2012.00529.x
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013b), What do experts know about forecasting journal quality? A comparison with ISI research impact in finance, Annals of Financial Economics, 8(1), 1-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S201049521350005X
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013c), Ranking leading econometric journals using citations data from ISI and RePEc, Econometrics, 1(3), 217-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/econometrics1030217
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2014), Ranking economics and econometrics ISI journals by quality weighted citations, to appear in Review of Economics.
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), What makes a great journal great in economics? The singer not the song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 326-361.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00648.x
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0335-0
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2011.586614
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011d), How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(11), 2563-2573.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.559212
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2013), Coercive journal self citations, impact factor, journal influence and article influence, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 93, 190-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.04.006
Fersht, A. (2009), The most influential journals: Impact factor and Eigenfactor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(17), 6883-6884.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903307106
Hirsch, J.E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-15572.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
ISI Web of Science (2011), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters ISI.
Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
Wilhite, A.W. and E.A. Fong (2012), Coercive citation in academic publishing, Science, 335 (6068), 542-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540

Downloads

Published

2014-03-20

How to Cite

Chang, C.-L., & McAleer, M. (2014). How Should Journal Quality be Ranked?An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.05

Issue

Section

Articles